64 Audio Nio VS 64 Audio Duo

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

64 Audio Nio and 64 Audio Duo use 1DD+8BA and 1DD+1BA driver setups respectively. 64 Audio Nio costs $1,700 while 64 Audio Duo costs $1,200. 64 Audio Nio is $500 more expensive. 64 Audio Nio holds a decisive 1.7-point edge in reviewer scores (7.7 vs 6.1). 64 Audio Nio has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, 64 Audio Duo has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, 64 Audio Nio has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and 64 Audio Nio has significantly better details with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Metric 64 Audio Nio 64 Audio Duo
Bass 8 8
Mids 8 7
Treble 6 7
Details 7 5
Imaging 6 6
Dynamics 8 7
Tonality 7.7 6.2
Technicalities 6.8 5.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough 64 Audio Nio and 64 Audio Duo reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

64 Audio Nio Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Crin
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.7

Strongly Favorable


64 Audio Duo Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Super* Review
Crin
Precogvision
Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

6.1

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

64 Audio Nio reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

The 64 Audio Nio enters as the most affordable set in this lineup at $1,700, a hybrid with 1DD + 8BA and swappable apex modules. Its core tonality is warm and a touch laid-back, with the M15 module pushing bass toward “too much of a good thing”—thick, soupy, and less resolving. Swapping to the M10 cleans things up: bass settles closer to neutral, top-end clarity improves, and the presentation feels more balanced overall. Detail is respectable rather than showy, and while the Nio can be bassy, it doesn’t deliver the most controlled low end when boosted. The standout trait here is timbre—the most natural-sounding of the group, especially with M10 installed.

Used as a daily driver, Nio with M10 suits listeners who want a smooth, natural tonality without treble bite; with M15, it veers into warm-thick territory at the cost of separation and perceived detail. Against 64 Audio’s own stable, it doesn’t reach the U12t’s BA bass quality or the Trio’s stage depth, but it offers an easygoing, organic listen that some will prefer on timbre alone. Verdict: 4/5 with the M10 module; drop to 3/5 on the M15 due to excessive bass and haze.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your 64 Audio Nio or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,752

Buy 64 Audio Nio on audio46

64 Audio Duo reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score rescaled + normalized

64 Audio Nio reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 7.1 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Sub-bass oriented with a very warm, thick tonality. MX module cleans things up quite a bit.
Youtube Video Summary

The 64 Audio Nio is a hybrid with 1DD + 8BA that leans into a richer, warmer presentation, trading ultimate microdetail for slam and engagement. Build and comfort are solid with a classy case upgrade; fit can vary, but tip selection helps. Technicals are mixed: imaging and separation are clean, staging is a bit intimate, and treble resolution is good via the TIA driver without sounding sharp.

The headline feature is the swappable apex modules. M15/M20 push the Nio into basshead territory—big sub-bass, head-nodding punch—while MX reins in the low end for a more balanced tonality that suits acoustic, jazz, and classical. Treble is well-extended yet relaxed; with the right tips, the 5 kHz energy avoids harshness, keeping the overall tuning smooth and non-fatiguing.

Against peers, the Nio’s strengths are its dynamics and configurable bass; its weaknesses are detail retrieval and stage size versus benchmarks like the 64 Audio U12t. Listeners chasing maximum clarity and air may prefer U12t, while those wanting hybrid physicality and tunable low-end will find strong value here. Verdict: choose M15/M20 for guilty-pleasure thump, choose MX for balance—the Nio remains a versatile, engaging high-end option.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: B Dynamics: A+ Details: A- Imaging: B

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

64 Audio Duo reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 6.4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
Strong dynamics and easy-going signature that could use more detail in the midrange.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Details: C+ Imaging: B

64 Audio Nio reviewed by Crin

Crin 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
B+ Tech
A decent bassy set with the m15/m20 modules, but really shines with the mX modules.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

64 Audio Duo reviewed by Crin

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech

64 Audio Duo (more reviews)

64 Audio Duo reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.8 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the 64 Audio Duo at an average of 4.7/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Exceptional.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

64 Audio Nio User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Duo User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Nio Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

64 Audio Duo Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

64 Audio Nio Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Bass A+
Expect a gripping low-end presence that marries clarity with visceral impact. Dynamic swings land with thrilling force.
Mids A+
Expect an immersive mid band where every vocal inflection and texture shines. Complex arrangements stay perfectly composed.
Treble B
Treble response is good, delivering clarity and sparkle without fatigue. Hi-hats sound lively without sting.
Dynamics A+
Expect thrilling dynamics that move effortlessly from whispers to roars. Explosive moments sound thrilling.
Details A-
Resolution feels both high and relaxed, capturing nuance with ease. There's zero smearing even at high volume.
Imaging B
Positions lock in with confidence, sketching a believable stage map. There's a tangible sense of stage geometry.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio Duo Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass A+
It delivers flagship-worthy bass, rich in both rumble and nuance. Reference tracks showcase its grip.
Mids A-
Expect lifelike vocals and instruments with impressive nuance and realism. You can easily follow harmonies and backups.
Treble A-
Treble performance is excellent—airy, extended, and beautifully controlled. It reveals subtle studio ambiance.
Dynamics A-
Dynamic performance is excellent, combining sharp transients with strong contrast. Transients snap with authority.
Details C+
The mix feels articulate, yet the tiniest ripples don't always sparkle. Background ambience is reasonably clear.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement and clear front/back localization. Positions snap into place convincingly.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio Nio User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio Duo User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer