64 Audio Nio VS 64 Audio U4S

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

64 Audio Nio and 64 Audio U4S use 1DD+8BA and 1DD+3BA driver setups respectively. 64 Audio Nio costs $1,700 while 64 Audio U4S costs $1,100. 64 Audio Nio is $600 more expensive. 64 Audio U4S holds a clear 0.5-point edge in reviewer scores (7.7 vs 8.2). 64 Audio U4S has better treble with a 0.8-point edge, 64 Audio Nio has slightly better dynamics with a 0.3-point edge, 64 Audio U4S has slightly better details with a 0.3-point edge and 64 Audio U4S has significantly better imaging with a 1.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric 64 Audio Nio 64 Audio U4S
Bass 8 8
Mids 8 7.8
Treble 6 6.8
Details 7 7.3
Soundstage 7.7 6
Imaging 6 7.5
Dynamics 8 7.7
Tonality 7.7 7.4
Technicalities 6.8 7

64 Audio Nio Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Crin
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.7

Strongly Favorable


64 Audio U4S Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Smirk Audio Jaytiss Precogvision
Audionotions
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

8.2

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score normalized

The 64 Audio U4s hits a compelling sweet spot: a 1DD+3BA hybrid around $1,100 that echoes the lush, bass-tilted character of the Nio while fixing key drawbacks. Packaging and accessories feel improved, with multiple tip options and the included M12 APEX module; APEX not only tailors bass but also relieves pressure for long sessions. Fit follows 64 Audio’s comfortable triangular shell; the vented DD asks for a slightly shallower insert than the all-BA models. Sonically, expect a sub-bass-oriented shelf and a treble profile that’s more lively and “zingy” than the Nio, with extra energy around the upper treble. The big caveat is 64 Audio’s muted 2–4 kHz region, which can set soprano vocals a step back on the stage.

Against the brand’s full-BA staples (think U12t/U6t), the U4s trades some pinpoint imaging and coherency for unmistakable DD slam and tactile “air pushing.” Extension at both ends is excellent, with upper-treble energy that makes micro-detail and reverb trails pop. It’s not the clean, conventional neutrality of something like a Monarch-style tuning; rather, it’s a deliberate, colored signature that delivers fun plus technical chops. Crucially, it fills a missing niche at its price and, in many respects, outperforms the pricier Nio, making the U4s a standout recommendation for listeners who want bass authority, sparkle, and engaging dynamics without going all-in on the flagship tier.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

64 Audio Nio reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 7.1 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Sub-bass oriented with a very warm, thick tonality. MX module cleans things up quite a bit.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: B Dynamics: A+ Details: A- Imaging: B

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 7.7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Fantastic colored tonality with options, and the unique technical qualities to back it up. M12/M15 modules recommended.

The 64 Audio U4s hits a compelling sweet spot: a 1DD+3BA hybrid around $1,100 that echoes the lush, bass-tilted character of the Nio while fixing key drawbacks. Packaging and accessories feel improved, with multiple tip options and the included M12 APEX module; APEX not only tailors bass but also relieves pressure for long sessions. Fit follows 64 Audio’s comfortable triangular shell; the vented DD asks for a slightly shallower insert than the all-BA models. Sonically, expect a sub-bass-oriented shelf and a treble profile that’s more lively and “zingy” than the Nio, with extra energy around the upper treble. The big caveat is 64 Audio’s muted 2–4 kHz region, which can set soprano vocals a step back on the stage.

Against the brand’s full-BA staples (think U12t/U6t), the U4s trades some pinpoint imaging and coherency for unmistakable DD slam and tactile “air pushing.” Extension at both ends is excellent, with upper-treble energy that makes micro-detail and reverb trails pop. It’s not the clean, conventional neutrality of something like a Monarch-style tuning; rather, it’s a deliberate, colored signature that delivers fun plus technical chops. Crucially, it fills a missing niche at its price and, in many respects, outperforms the pricier Nio, making the U4s a standout recommendation for listeners who want bass authority, sparkle, and engaging dynamics without going all-in on the flagship tier.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

64 Audio Nio (more reviews)

64 Audio Nio reviewed by Crin

Crin 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
B+ Tech
A decent bassy set with the m15/m20 modules, but really shines with the mX modules.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

64 Audio U4S (more reviews)

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8.5 Reviewer Score
A step down in techs from U12T (possibly a half step down from U6T). But very well tuned and adds in a dynamic driver punch. Timbre is slightly improved compared to U12T due to the increase in midbass and upper mids energy. On the second hand market, 64Audio IEMs are among the best values in portable audio, the U4S is no exception. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
A tastefully colored U12t with a more intimate soundstage, a cutback in technicalities, and more bass realism.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: A Imaging: A+

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It's a solid set, with great build quality, but sonically isn't the specialist that I want it to be.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A+ Treble: B Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B

64 Audio Nio User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio U4S User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Nio Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

64 Audio U4S Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

64 Audio Nio Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A+
Superb dynamic range - powerful yet nuanced. Exceptional transient response with lifelike impact and subtle volume gradations.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio U4S Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B+
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio Nio User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio U4S User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer