64 Audio Tia Trio VS FATfreq Scarlett Mini

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

64 Audio Tia Trio and FATfreq Scarlett Mini are 1DD+2BA in-ear monitors. 64 Audio Tia Trio costs $2,300 while FATfreq Scarlett Mini costs $799. 64 Audio Tia Trio is $1,501 more expensive. 64 Audio Tia Trio holds a clear 0.6-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 7.9). 64 Audio Tia Trio has better bass with a 0.7-point edge, FATfreq Scarlett Mini has slightly better mids with a 0.4-point edge, FATfreq Scarlett Mini has better treble with a 0.8-point edge, 64 Audio Tia Trio has slightly better dynamics with a 0.4-point edge, 64 Audio Tia Trio has better details with a 0.5-point edge and 64 Audio Tia Trio has better imaging with a 0.9-point edge.

Insights

Metric 64 Audio Tia Trio FATfreq Scarlett Mini
Bass 10 9.3
Mids 7 7.4
Treble 7 7.8
Details 8 7.5
Soundstage 8.5 7.2
Imaging 8.5 7.6
Dynamics 9 8.6
Tonality 7.8 7.7
Technicalities 8 7.6

64 Audio Tia Trio Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin
Nymz Precogvision
Audionotions
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

8.5

Very Positive


FATfreq Scarlett Mini Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Web Search
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

7.9

Strongly Favorable


Reviews Comparison

64 Audio Tia Trio (more reviews)

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 10* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

The tia Trio comes across as a hybrid with personality: rich, thick, and warm, with slightly forward treble that adds air without tipping into the harsher edge heard on the U18t. Vocals are pulled back, yet the presentation feels cohesive and surprisingly natural given its unconventional response. What really stands out is the depth and head-stage—a wraparound sense of space that feels more immersive than most peers, making guitar strums and ambient cues pop in a way that’s immediately engaging.

Despite the 1DD + 2BA configuration, bass isn’t a simple upgrade over the U12t’s BA low end; it carries a touch more body and plosive weight but can feel a bit slower and less refined. Still, detail retrieval punches well above the driver count, and the overall tuning—while relaxed in the mids—stays clean and exciting. With the usual 64 Audio caveats (no apex swapping here and a mediocre stock cable), the tia Trio earns a five-star verdict for its intoxicating stage and atmosphere, even if it’s not the safest all-rounder at its $2,300 price.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your 64 Audio Tia Trio or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,800

Buy 64 Audio Tia Trio on audio46

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 9 Reviewer Score
Phenomenal bass texture and quality. Mids are good if not great - I don't have much to nitpick about them - good note weight and excellent clarity. Treble is very sparkly and airy though some may find it a bit too much - I think the extra spice actually helps with instruments like violins. Imaging isn't quite as precise as U12T but stage is just as large if not more so. Timbre is not exactly natural but it is very good and definitely not offensive at all. My subjective favorite IEM to date. This is without a doubt a colored listen but it is so satisfying. Makes U12T sound almost sterile. That said both are good counterpoints to each other. Personal Unit

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 8.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Best bass texture ever. Gorgeous treble extension, stage and imaging. Coherency and timbre a bit off. Upper mids/lower treble could be better. As amazing as it is, I couldn't fully connect with it (musically). Price is the biggest con.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: S+ Mids: A- Treble: A- Details: A+ Imaging: S

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Rich bass and out-of-head imaging.
Youtube Video Summary

The tia Trio mirrors 64 Audio’s flagship DNA at a lower price point ($2,299) with the same compact, lightweight aluminum build, generous tip selection, and a comfortable shell that suits smaller ears. Sonically it carries a present but well-judged bass shelf, adding a touch of warmth by settling around ~180Hz rather than the usual sub-bass focus. Crucially, the midrange corrects the Forte’s biggest flaw: upper mids aren’t hollowed out here. There’s a mild 1.5–3k dip (about 1–2dB), yet vocals and instruments remain properly contoured and far more natural and engaging without requiring EQ.

Up top, the Trio shows recognizable treble landmarks—an emphasis near 5k that can sound a bit shouty and another at 8k adding slight sizzle—tempered by the healthier mids, so the presentation is lively without becoming harsh. Treble extension is excellent, with “air” above 10k running a tad hot depending on taste. On technicalities, detail retrieval and image clarity track surprisingly close to both the Forte and Legend Evo; the soundstage is expansive for an IEM (strong depth and layering) though not as outsized as Forte, and imaging is accurate for music but not surgical enough for competitive FPS. Taken as a whole—and especially without EQ—the tia Trio feels like the more complete listen: a high-end IEM that preserves the fun while fixing the midrange, trading only a slice of stage grandeur for a much more balanced, recommendable experience.

Bass: S+ Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: S Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Crin

Crin 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
A more correct sounding version of the Fourte with slight cutbacks in staging and sheer resolution.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

FATfreq Scarlett Mini (more reviews)

FATfreq Scarlett Mini reviewed by Z-Reviews

2025-09-26
Z-Reviews 8 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Scarlett Mini is framed as a bass experiment first, IEM second: a ~$666 set (or $833 with the light-red “upgraded” cable) that pushes a 30 dB sub-bass shelf so far that every track becomes a bass test. The low end is described as omnipresent—a physical, room-shaking effect that makes even lean recordings throb—while mids/treble behave like a competent $200–$300 set with decent stage and a sweet, crisp top end (not kilobuck texture). It’s also hard to drive, likely due to a heavy crossover network, and scales with power more in weight than in refinement. The upgraded cable gets a thumbs-down on feel and value; the advice is to skip the cable upcharge.

This tuning is called weird but fun—a “bass cannon” for listeners who’ve heard everything and want their library to feel new and outrageous again. The warning is clear: extended use may ruin perception of normal gear because the sub-bass sets a new baseline; take “vacations” from it. For quality-first listeners seeking separation and balance, the rest of the signature won’t justify the price; for bass die-hards, paying a few hundred dollars just for the bass trick might be exactly the point. Measurements won’t look neutral, and that’s by design—this is a specialized, end-of-the-road indulgence rather than a daily driver.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

FATfreq Scarlett Mini reviewed by Web Search

2025-09-26
uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech

The FATfreq Scarlet Mini is a hybrid IEM positioned in the brand’s “Scarlet” line with a 1DD+2BA configuration and a stated focus on sub-bass power and treble extension; retailer specs list a single dynamic driver plus two balanced armatures, while the brand highlights a “hyper tweeter” system that extends to 40 kHz . Frequency-response measurements published by a retailer show an extreme sub-bass shelf below ~200 Hz with restrained upper-mids and a smooth, airy top end—consistent with a U-shaped, sub-bass-emphasized tuning rather than a neutral target . FATfreq and dealers market the model with the “world’s first 30 dB sub-bass shelf” claim; while that’s a marketing line, the published curves support a very elevated low end in practice .

On technicalities, the Scarlet Mini emphasizes slam and macrodynamics over microdetail: the powerful sub-bass delivers texture and weight, but can modestly mask lower-mid articulation on dense mixes, while treble extension from the dedicated HF driver provides adequate air without aggressive bite . Practical specs—105 dB sensitivity and 16 Ω impedance—suggest it’s easy to drive; the included SPC cable and accessory set are typical for the segment, and the U-shaped, bass-heavy tuning targets listeners prioritizing impact over strict neutrality . Street pricing varies by region and cable option, but the official product page lists an MSRP tier around $799 for the base configuration, which frames expectations on value relative to other mid/upper-mid offerings .


Bass: S Mids: A- Treble: A Dynamics: S- Soundstage: A- Details: A Imaging: A

64 Audio Tia Trio User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FATfreq Scarlett Mini User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Tia Trio Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.4

Gaming Grade

B

FATfreq Scarlett Mini Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.1

Gaming Grade

A-

64 Audio Tia Trio Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • It sounds refined and controlled, keeping instruments neatly separated with immersive staging. Busy arrangements remain neatly organized.
Bass S+
The bass is breathtaking, pairing thunderous impact with absolute precision. Every rumble is rendered with realism.
Mids A-
The mids sound lush and articulate, capturing emotion effortlessly. Strings and keys shimmer with realism.
Treble A-
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics S
This is reference-grade dynamic performance with breathtaking realism. It mirrors live-music intensity perfectly.
Details A+
No subtlety is too small; the presentation exposes it all with composure. Complex tracks remain crystal clear.
Imaging S-
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision that creates a palpable sense of placement. It creates a near-holographic placement.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

FATfreq Scarlett Mini Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • You get a polished tonal profile that stays natural from bass through treble. Subtle tuning choices keep things engaging.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • The balance of resolution and space feels assured, keeping complex passages coherent. Layering is convincing on most studio mixes.
Bass S
You get a reference-grade low end that feels powerful, deep, and effortlessly clean. The low-end foundation sounds studio-grade.
Mids A-
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble A
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics S-
The presentation feels expansive, letting micro and macro dynamics breathe. There's a sense of limitless headroom.
Soundstage A-
The stage stretches in every direction, carving out clear three-dimensional pockets for each player. Placement accuracy impresses from the start.
Details A
Micro-details glide to the forefront effortlessly while timbre remains natural. Ambient cues are vivid and lifelike.
Imaging A
Each element locks into a steady coordinate even as the mix grows dense. Imaging holds even during busy segments.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio Tia Trio User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

FATfreq Scarlett Mini User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer