64 Audio Tia Trio VS Yu9 Que

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

64 Audio Tia Trio and Yu9 Que use 1DD+2BA and 1DD+3BA driver setups respectively. 64 Audio Tia Trio costs $2,300 while Yu9 Que costs $409. 64 Audio Tia Trio is $1,891 more expensive. 64 Audio Tia Trio holds a slight 0.4-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 8.1). 64 Audio Tia Trio has significantly better bass with a 1.8-point edge, Yu9 Que has significantly better mids with a 1.5-point edge, Yu9 Que has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, 64 Audio Tia Trio has significantly better dynamics with a 1.6-point edge, 64 Audio Tia Trio has better details with a 0.5-point edge and 64 Audio Tia Trio has better imaging with a 0.9-point edge.

Insights

Metric 64 Audio Tia Trio Yu9 Que
Bass 10 8.2
Mids 7 8.5
Treble 7 8
Details 8 7.6
Soundstage 8.5 8.1
Imaging 8.5 7.6
Dynamics 9 7.4
Tonality 7.8 8.1
Technicalities 8 7.8

64 Audio Tia Trio Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin
Nymz Precogvision
Audionotions
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

8.5

Very Positive


Yu9 Que Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio Precogvision
Audionotions Fox Told Me So IEMRanking AI
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

8.1

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 9 Reviewer Score
Phenomenal bass texture and quality. Mids are good if not great - I don't have much to nitpick about them - good note weight and excellent clarity. Treble is very sparkly and airy though some may find it a bit too much - I think the extra spice actually helps with instruments like violins. Imaging isn't quite as precise as U12T but stage is just as large if not more so. Timbre is not exactly natural but it is very good and definitely not offensive at all. My subjective favorite IEM to date. This is without a doubt a colored listen but it is so satisfying. Makes U12T sound almost sterile. That said both are good counterpoints to each other. Personal Unit

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Yu9 Que reviewed by Audionotions

2025-09-26

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Rich bass and out-of-head imaging.

The tia Trio mirrors 64 Audio’s flagship DNA at a lower price point ($2,299) with the same compact, lightweight aluminum build, generous tip selection, and a comfortable shell that suits smaller ears. Sonically it carries a present but well-judged bass shelf, adding a touch of warmth by settling around ~180Hz rather than the usual sub-bass focus. Crucially, the midrange corrects the Forte’s biggest flaw: upper mids aren’t hollowed out here. There’s a mild 1.5–3k dip (about 1–2dB), yet vocals and instruments remain properly contoured and far more natural and engaging without requiring EQ.

Up top, the Trio shows recognizable treble landmarks—an emphasis near 5k that can sound a bit shouty and another at 8k adding slight sizzle—tempered by the healthier mids, so the presentation is lively without becoming harsh. Treble extension is excellent, with “air” above 10k running a tad hot depending on taste. On technicalities, detail retrieval and image clarity track surprisingly close to both the Forte and Legend Evo; the soundstage is expansive for an IEM (strong depth and layering) though not as outsized as Forte, and imaging is accurate for music but not surgical enough for competitive FPS. Taken as a whole—and especially without EQ—the tia Trio feels like the more complete listen: a high-end IEM that preserves the fun while fixing the midrange, trading only a slice of stage grandeur for a much more balanced, recommendable experience.

Bass: S+ Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: S Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Precogvision

2025-09-17
Precogvision 7.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech
Exceptional tuning and treble refinement; sets the benchmark at $400.

Yu9’s Que lands as a “safer Annihilator”: a warmer, scaled-back take that pushes ample sub-bass while keeping the rest tastefully controlled. The low end feels liquidy and bouncy, underpinning an aggressive 1–3 kHz rise with a gentle 3–5 kHz taper, so vocals sit upfront and crisp yet remain remarkably smooth thanks to the extra low-end warmth. Treble is slightly scooped around 5–6 kHz and then climbs in small, well-placed peaks out to ~15–18 kHz, yielding excellent extension that feels on par with sets like Moondrop Variations in this range.

What makes it pop is the value proposition: at $400, the overall resolution, tonal balance, and staging read far pricier—more like the $700–800 bracket. With its engaging sub-bass lift, lucid mids, and airy yet controlled top end, Que comes off as a polished, crowd-friendly tuning that still excites detail chasers. If momentum holds, this looks like the next big thing around the $400 mark.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

64 Audio Tia Trio (more reviews)

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 10* * score normalized

The tia Trio comes across as a hybrid with personality: rich, thick, and warm, with slightly forward treble that adds air without tipping into the harsher edge heard on the U18t. Vocals are pulled back, yet the presentation feels cohesive and surprisingly natural given its unconventional response. What really stands out is the depth and head-stage—a wraparound sense of space that feels more immersive than most peers, making guitar strums and ambient cues pop in a way that’s immediately engaging.

Despite the 1DD + 2BA configuration, bass isn’t a simple upgrade over the U12t’s BA low end; it carries a touch more body and plosive weight but can feel a bit slower and less refined. Still, detail retrieval punches well above the driver count, and the overall tuning—while relaxed in the mids—stays clean and exciting. With the usual 64 Audio caveats (no apex swapping here and a mediocre stock cable), the tia Trio earns a five-star verdict for its intoxicating stage and atmosphere, even if it’s not the safest all-rounder at its $2,300 price.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 8.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Best bass texture ever. Gorgeous treble extension, stage and imaging. Coherency and timbre a bit off. Upper mids/lower treble could be better. As amazing as it is, I couldn't fully connect with it (musically). Price is the biggest con.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: S+ Mids: A- Treble: A- Details: A+ Imaging: S

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Crin

Crin 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
A more correct sounding version of the Fourte with slight cutbacks in staging and sheer resolution.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que (more reviews)

Yu9 Que reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-08-09
Jaytiss 9.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Clean neutral nice mids. This iem is dumb, just buy it.

The YU9 Que sports a premium, durable resin shell in pure black with a metallic-feeling faceplate and a comfortable design featuring an anti-tragus catch. While the build itself feels handsome and unique, the included cable is criticized as wimpy and unpleasant, with a strong suggestion to upgrade it. Accessories are deemed solid, including a nice selection of tips and a particularly praised case with a soft, luxurious interior.

Sonically, the YU9 Que earns immense praise for its exceptional tuning, described as clean, resolute, and non-fatiguing. It delivers strong, textured bass that avoids being overwhelming, coupled with extremely well-done upper mids. While not class-leading in technicalities like micro-detail or instrument separation, its tonal balance is considered sophisticated and reminiscent of far more expensive sets like the Annihilator, even surpassing the Monarch MKII in tuning preference. It's highlighted as a fantastic all-rounder with a smooth, agreeable signature suitable for long listening sessions.

Despite its modest single dynamic driver + 3BA configuration and $49 price point, the YU9 Que is declared a very special and unique IEM, worthy of the hype it received. The review concludes it's a price leader and a highly competent package from a small brand, offering outstanding value and a beautiful, well-executed design that makes it an easy recommendation for those seeking a smooth, non-fatiguing sound.

Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Fox Told Me So

2025-09-26
Fox Told Me So 8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
YU9 Audio QUE is a $300 hybrid (1DD + 3BA) with a name rooted in Chinese culture—“阙” (QUE, palace), paired with a fish bone logo from “鱼” (YU, fish). Shells are aluminum with a sandblasted, wavy faceplate finish.

Tuning is clean, neutral, and slightly V-shaped: bass is tight, bouncy, and textured; mids sit slightly forward thanks to extra 700 Hz–2 kHz gain, giving vocals a bigger image; treble leans bright with a 4–5 kHz push for clarity, rolling off naturally rather than chasing EST-style air. Sibilance can appear (on “th” or “tsu”), but not harsh.

Stage favors width over depth—impressively wide at the price, with neat, well-ordered placement and strong separation. Resolution is crisp, background clean, every note clearly etched.

YU9 Audio’s QUE blends thoughtful design with a restrained driver mix—1DD + 2ED + custom WBFK—to pursue a clean, neutral presentation rather than spec-sheet flash. The matte, sandblasted aluminum shell looks simple yet refined, and the overall build recalls the word “阙” (palace), hinting at structure and stability. What stands out sonically is the tidy, well-drawn background: notes feel neatly edged, with separation that avoids smearing or overlap.

Sub-bass reach and punch are satisfying, with a quick, bouncy response and clear layering down into the rumble. The mids place vocals slightly forward, helped by gain in the 700 Hz–2 kHz region, yielding bigger vocal images without sounding shouty. Treble rises more than JM-1, peaking around 4–5 kHz before a natural roll-off; this sharpens articulation and female vocals but introduces audible sibilance on “th/tsu” sounds—present yet short of piercing. Stage width exceeds expectations for the price, depth is modest, and imaging stays orderly. For listeners sensitive to brighter treble, caution is warranted; for everyone else, QUE delivers a convincingly balanced, all-round tuning that justifies the hype.


Fox Told Me So original ranking

Fox Told Me So Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Jays Audio

2025-10-03
Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
An OG SA6 with a little more treble and low-end, but less mids, and even more pulled back vocals. Smooth listen, non-fatiguing, scales good, natural, but lacks dynamics and vocal extension. Reminds me of a bassier Pilgrim. Decent, but I think it's a bit overhyped.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by IEMRanking AI

2025-09-19
IEMRanking AI 8.3 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech

The YU9 Que is a hybrid IEM using 1 dynamic driver + 3 balanced armatures, positioned in the mid-upper price tier with an MSRP around $399. Retail listings confirm the configuration (10 mm LF DD with three Knowles BA units) and current pricing in USD and MYR, placing it among competitors that emphasize tonal refinement over sheer technical fireworks.

Community impressions describe a balanced/neutral tonality with a tasteful bass lift, smooth upper-mids that avoid glare, and treble that leans non-sibilant. Subjective reports on Head-Fi and Reddit consistently frame the Que as an all-rounder that favors coherence and long-term listenability over maximum micro-detail.

Technically, listeners note solid imaging and macrodynamics with competent detail retrieval, though not class-leading for the price. The manufacturer has also published frequency-response plots (IEC711 and BK5128 rigs), which aligns with the community’s take that the Que targets a broadly neutral/balanced signature rather than an aggressive V-shape. Overall value is credible at its MSRP if you prioritize tonal balance and comfort over ultra-analytical presentation.


Bass: A+ Mids: S- Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A+

64 Audio Tia Trio User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Yu9 Que User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Tia Trio Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.4

Gaming Grade

B

Yu9 Que Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.6

Gaming Grade

A

64 Audio Tia Trio Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • Very competent with articulate presentation. Well-defined layers and precise imaging. Soundstage is immersive and handles dynamics well.
Bass S+
World-class bass performance. Perfectly balanced between visceral impact, texture, and depth with zero bleed into mids.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics S
Reference-class dynamics: perfect micro/macro contrast with lightning transients. Utterly realistic reproduction of musical energy.
Details A+
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers. Retrieves even the most minute details while maintaining natural timbre.
Imaging S-
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision. Creates a palpable sense of physical placement with perfect positional stability.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Yu9 Que Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Refined execution with coherent frequency integration. Natural timbre reproduction and engaging presentation. Strong versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids S-
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A+
Superb treble: effortless extension with crystal clarity. Perfect balance of sparkle and smoothness with exceptional detail.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Details A
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

64 Audio Tia Trio User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Yu9 Que User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer