64 Audio U12T VS Aful Cantor

The 64 Audio U12t lands exactly where its reputation suggests: a warm, laid-back, yet highly detailed all-rounder that stays engaging without ever turning fatiguing. With the apex M15 module, bass shifts toward a tasteful sub-bass lift that adds punch and body while keeping the midrange clean; vocals sit a touch relaxed, and the treble reaches high with smooth extension and air. Despite being an all-BA set, the low end carries surprising weight and macro-dynamics, and the overall presentation feels effortless and cohesive—“does-it-all” tuning done right.

Trade-offs are minor: timbre can sound slightly artificial at times, and dropping to the M10 module trims bass but also some excitement. Build is comfortable and compact, though the stock cable is annoyingly wiry and memory-prone. Against its stablemates, U12t stands as the benchmark: cleaner and less fatiguing than U18t, more versatile than the warmer Nio (with M15), and less head-stage wow than Trio but more universally balanced. End result: a confident 5/5 for a high-price IEM that actually feels worth chasing if this signature hits the brief.

Super* Review original ranking

The AFUL Cantor lands as a flagship all-BA set with 14 balanced armatures at $800, packaged with a great-handling nylon cable and a handsome shell. The catch is fit: a very long nozzle with a metal insert demands a deep insertion, and comfort varies widely; AFUL’s stock tips are essentially required to keep that nozzle from poking and to restore some flex. Build and presentation impress, but the ear-fit can be fussy and the shells tend to stick out.

Tuning trends U-shaped: a lower-mid dip into a hefty sub-bass boost, relaxed upper mids, and noticeable upper-treble energy. When seated correctly, the set delivers crisp transients with a touch of “planar-like” pluck, good imaging, and clean BA bass that favors electronic thump over kick-drum slam; with the wrong tip or depth it swings to brittle/bright or muted. The midrange can read a bit thin, so the contrast comes more from bass/treble edges than from vocal saturation.

Compared with Symphonium Helios, both are all-BA and graph-adjacent, but Helios leans vocal-forward and smooth while Cantor is the more contrasty, fun listen that trades mid presence for excitement. Net: technically capable and competitive when dialed in, yet compromised by comfort and tip dependence. Final verdict: 3/5 stars—a better match for listeners with deep pockets and deep ears.

Super* Review original ranking

Presented as a former favorite turned cautionary tale, the 64 Audio U12t shows a **neutral-warm bass** with good texture, speed, and separation, though the **mid-bass** can feel unnecessary for a non–bass-head tuning. Trouble starts at the **3 kHz scoop**, where vocals lose presence and clarity; attempts to restore bite via added **treble** create **sharpness** instead of openness, with emphasized peaks around **13 kHz** and **17 kHz**. This combo makes volume scaling tricky—either accept **recessed vocals** or endure **fatiguing highs**—though the treble is otherwise solid from 6–10 kHz.

Technical chops are undeniably strong: **detail retrieval**, **instrument layering**, and **imaging** are top-tier, with quick attacks and clean separation across the stage. Still, the staging feels **wide yet flat**, as the recessed mids reduce depth and contrast, and dynamic tracks (K-pop/J-pop/J-rock) expose the unevenness, prompting constant volume tweaks; slower, softer material fares better. Given the vocal recession and treble fatigue, the value proposition is questioned for a **$2,000** set—alternatives like the **Variations** and **EGL7m** offer more **open, extended vocals** with smoother treble, while **RS5** and **Heyday** provide extra **warmth** without the same pitfalls.

Jays Audio original ranking

The Aful Cantor presents a complex and frustrating case, offering what might be some of the most detailed and resolving performance under $1,000. The clarity, separation, and sheer resolution are described as "pretty nuts," positioning the Cantor as a potential benchmark for technical ability. It delivers a clean, smooth, light, and airy sound signature with a bass that is very fast, lean, and features a tight sub-bass rumble. At lower volumes, this presentation is highly enjoyable and non-fatiguing, making it exceptionally good for critical, quiet listening sessions where its technical prowess can shine without drawback.

However, this technical marvel comes with a significant and unusual caveat: it is physically fatiguing to the point of causing headaches and a ringing sensation in the temples after only 15-30 minutes of listening at moderate volumes (around 70-80 dB). This is not a fit or nozzle issue, but rather an inherent property of the IEM itself. The problem manifests as a shrill and overly intense quality in the treble at higher volumes, accompanied by a metallic timbre on tracks with lots of cymbals, making it unsuitable for energetic genres like K-pop, J-pop, or EDM. This shrillness is not fully solved by EQ and is believed to be related to the driver design, nozzle, or venting rather than just the tuning.

When compared to peers, the Cantor is more resolving than the warmer, fuller, and smoother Letshuoer Supernova but falls short of its natural timbre. It also can't match the Monarch MK3 as an all-rounder, which offers a more impactful bass, better vocals, and a smoother, more engaging experience. The Cantor's vocals are also a weak point, being recessed, light, and borderline thin. The final recommendation is to definitely demo these first; they are only easy to recommend for those who listen at very low volumes (under 60 dB) and are not sensitive to treble intensity, as its scaling at normal listening levels is poor.

Jays Audio original ranking

The AFUL Cantor delivers a balanced and neutral sound signature, praised for its exceptional upper air, treble extension, and pristine clarity. While the bass offers sufficient dynamics without being thunderous, and female vocals sound natural, some listeners might desire a touch more punch in the upper mids (around 2-3kHz) and find a slight peak in the 4-6kHz region occasionally noticeable. The premium build quality stands out, featuring a unique and stunning "star night" face plate, a thick but comfortable shell with a slender nozzle, and excellent accessories. These include a slightly microphonic but otherwise nice-looking flat two-pin cable and an exceptionally plush case typically found on far more expensive IEMs.

Graph comparisons reveal the Cantor's tuning shares similarities with models like the Moondrop Blessing 2: Dusk and the AFUL Explorer, but it distinguishes itself with superior detail retrieval and dynamics. It competes impressively against significantly pricier offerings like the Elysian Annihilator in technical performance, offering a smoother presentation with slightly less sub-bass focus. The overall sonic presentation is described as sophisticated, refined, and highly engaging, creating a sense of music surrounding the listener. Minor tuning preferences aside – wishing for a bit more upper mid presence and slightly less energy around 4-6kHz and 8kHz – the core sound quality is highly regarded.

Representing strong sonic value despite its price point, the Cantor earns a high ranking for its unique and beautiful design, premium feel, and exceptional technical performance. While acknowledging excellent cheaper options like the AFUL Explorer exist, the Cantor justifies its cost with its detailed, airy presentation and overall package. It's highly recommended for those seeking a neutral, high-performing IEM, though a demo is advised given the investment. Ultimately, the AFUL Cantor is considered a treasure, fulfilling over a year of anticipation with its beautiful aesthetics and uniquely engaging sound.

Jaytiss original ranking

Presentation falls short of flagship expectations—especially the stock cable, which feels flimsy and uninspiring—but the tuning is where the 64 Audio U12t earns its reputation. With a gently U-shaped response and swappable apex modules altering bass quantity (M10 leaner; M15/M20 adding a deeper, sub-bass-tilted shelf), the low end carries uncommon texture and decay for an all-BA setup while preserving BA speed and control. The sub-bass shelf levels off around 200Hz, avoiding midrange bleed and keeping the overall tonality clean and balanced.

The mids are slightly scooped yet inoffensive, with ear-gain centering near 2kHz and a tasteful dip through 2–5kHz that preserves depth without hollowing out vocals. Treble is distinctive thanks to the tia super tweeter mounted at the nozzle: a mid-treble dip followed by pronounced peaks around 15–17kHz creates a sense of airy “pseudo-treble” that some listeners (especially younger ears) perceive as bright, while others may find it dark if those upper harmonics aren’t audible. Tip choice matters—Spinfits can emphasize air, while Final E can tame the top end—making the signature unusually tunable to preference.

On the technical front, the U12t is highly resolving, pulling micro-details forward with ease, yet its transient attack has a subtle softness that gives an “analog” character rather than razor-edged sharpness. Where it truly distinguishes itself is macrodynamics—quiet-to-loud swings feel visceral and engaging, a rarity among BA designs and rivaled only by a select few dynamic-driver flagships. Summed up, it’s the “90-in-every-subject” kind of performer: maybe not the single best at any one metric, but making the fewest compromises across the board. For anyone seeking a well-rounded flagship that handles almost anything with poise, the U12t remains a top recommendation.

Precogvision original ranking

This is AFUL’s flagship science project: the Cantor packs 14 BAs per side (28 total) and a heap of buzzword tech—Dual-Channel Acoustic Maze for sub-bass, non-destructive direct-drive topology, and multi-dimensional crossover trickery that reads like Star Trek schematics. The housing even extends a stainless-steel nozzle to the tip’s end to bypass tip coloration—smart for consistency, dicey for ears with wide-bore silicones. Stick to the stock silicones or better yet foams to calm treble and avoid any scrape-risk.

Sonically it’s a hyper-resolving analyzer: every band is so present that volume tends to go down, not up, and mediocre recordings get roasted on the spot. Imaging is precise but a bit less cohesive than simpler sets; stage stays as the track dictates, while separation feels like a mixing desk with 14 faders. The sub-bass dives shockingly deep for an all-BA—think whisper-low “whoomp”—yet it isn’t a bass-monster; overall balance leans revealing rather than lush.

Pairing matters: clinical amps make it razor-edged, while warmer sources (R2R, iFi, RME-ish) and foam tips smooth it into addictive detail. At $800 it isn’t the one IEM to rule them all; it’s the specialist tool for listeners who want to dissect space, mic technique, and mix decisions—more control room than mosh pit. Cable and case are solid (4.4 mm balanced), and a tuning switch would have been nice, but for the right kind of nerd this thing lets you become the squig.

Z-Reviews original ranking