64 Audio U12T and Fort Ears Mefisto are in-ear monitors. 64 Audio U12T costs $1,999 while Fort Ears Mefisto costs $2,900. Fort Ears Mefisto is $901 more expensive. Fort Ears Mefisto holds a clear 0.7-point edge in reviewer scores (8.3 vs 9). 64 Audio U12T has slightly better bass with a 0.4-point edge, Fort Ears Mefisto has slightly better mids with a 0.3-point edge, Fort Ears Mefisto has better treble with a 0.8-point edge, Fort Ears Mefisto has better dynamics with a 0.8-point edge, 64 Audio U12T has slightly better details with a 0.4-point edge and 64 Audio U12T has better imaging with a 0.6-point edge.
Insights
Metric | 64 Audio U12T | Fort Ears Mefisto |
---|---|---|
Bass | 8.5 | 8 |
Mids | 8.2 | 8.5 |
Treble | 7.7 | 8.5 |
Details | 8.9 | 8.5 |
Soundstage | 8.2 | 9 |
Imaging | 9.1 | 8.5 |
Dynamics | 7.7 | 8.5 |
Tonality | 7.9 | 8.3 |
Technicalities | 8.6 | 8.5 |
64 Audio U12T Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
8.3Very Positive
Fort Ears Mefisto Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
9Outstanding
Reviews Comparison
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Smirk Audio
Buy 64 Audio U12T on audio46
Ad
Price: $1,999
Buy 64 Audio U12T on audio46
Fort Ears Mefisto reviewed by Smirk Audio
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Head-Fi.org
Fort Ears Mefisto reviewed by Head-Fi.org
64 Audio U12T (more reviews)
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Super* Review
Youtube Video Summary
The 64 Audio U12t lands exactly where its reputation suggests: a warm, laid-back, yet highly detailed all-rounder that stays engaging without ever turning fatiguing. With the apex M15 module, bass shifts toward a tasteful sub-bass lift that adds punch and body while keeping the midrange clean; vocals sit a touch relaxed, and the treble reaches high with smooth extension and air. Despite being an all-BA set, the low end carries surprising weight and macro-dynamics, and the overall presentation feels effortless and cohesive—“does-it-all” tuning done right.
Trade-offs are minor: timbre can sound slightly artificial at times, and dropping to the M10 module trims bass but also some excitement. Build is comfortable and compact, though the stock cable is annoyingly wiry and memory-prone. Against its stablemates, U12t stands as the benchmark: cleaner and less fatiguing than U18t, more versatile than the warmer Nio (with M15), and less head-stage wow than Trio but more universally balanced. End result: a confident 5/5 for a high-price IEM that actually feels worth chasing if this signature hits the brief.
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel64 Audio U12T reviewed by Nymz
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Audionotions
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Precogvision
Youtube Video Summary
Presentation falls short of flagship expectations—especially the stock cable, which feels flimsy and uninspiring—but the tuning is where the 64 Audio U12t earns its reputation. With a gently U-shaped response and swappable apex modules altering bass quantity (M10 leaner; M15/M20 adding a deeper, sub-bass-tilted shelf), the low end carries uncommon texture and decay for an all-BA setup while preserving BA speed and control. The sub-bass shelf levels off around 200Hz, avoiding midrange bleed and keeping the overall tonality clean and balanced.
The mids are slightly scooped yet inoffensive, with ear-gain centering near 2kHz and a tasteful dip through 2–5kHz that preserves depth without hollowing out vocals. Treble is distinctive thanks to the tia super tweeter mounted at the nozzle: a mid-treble dip followed by pronounced peaks around 15–17kHz creates a sense of airy “pseudo-treble” that some listeners (especially younger ears) perceive as bright, while others may find it dark if those upper harmonics aren’t audible. Tip choice matters—Spinfits can emphasize air, while Final E can tame the top end—making the signature unusually tunable to preference.
On the technical front, the U12t is highly resolving, pulling micro-details forward with ease, yet its transient attack has a subtle softness that gives an “analog” character rather than razor-edged sharpness. Where it truly distinguishes itself is macrodynamics—quiet-to-loud swings feel visceral and engaging, a rarity among BA designs and rivaled only by a select few dynamic-driver flagships. Summed up, it’s the “90-in-every-subject” kind of performer: maybe not the single best at any one metric, but making the fewest compromises across the board. For anyone seeking a well-rounded flagship that handles almost anything with poise, the U12t remains a top recommendation.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Jays Audio
Youtube Video Summary
Presented as a former favorite turned cautionary tale, the 64 Audio U12t shows a neutral-warm bass with good texture, speed, and separation, though the mid-bass can feel unnecessary for a non–bass-head tuning. Trouble starts at the 3 kHz scoop, where vocals lose presence and clarity; attempts to restore bite via added treble create sharpness instead of openness, with emphasized peaks around 13 kHz and 17 kHz. This combo makes volume scaling tricky—either accept recessed vocals or endure fatiguing highs—though the treble is otherwise solid from 6–10 kHz. Technical chops are undeniably strong: detail retrieval, instrument layering, and imaging are top-tier, with quick attacks and clean separation across the stage. Still, the staging feels wide yet flat, as the recessed mids reduce depth and contrast, and dynamic tracks (K-pop/J-pop/J-rock) expose the unevenness, prompting constant volume tweaks; slower, softer material fares better. Given the vocal recession and treble fatigue, the value proposition is questioned for a $2,000 set—alternatives like the Variations and EGL7m offer more open, extended vocals with smoother treble, while RS5 and Heyday provide extra warmth without the same pitfalls.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Shuwa-T
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Jaytiss
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Tim Tuned
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Crin
64 Audio U12T reviewed by Web Search
2025-09-11
The 64 Audio U12t is a mature flagship-class UIEM built around twelve balanced armatures per side and the company’s tia (open-BA) and apex pressure-relief tech; it lists at $1,999. Module options (mX/m15/m20) vary isolation from roughly −10 to −20 dB, giving modest control over perceived balance without changing the core tuning. The driver split—1 tia high, 1 high-mid, 6 mid, 4 low—aims for coherence via a 4-way crossover in a compact, aluminum shell.
Tonally the U12t trends neutral with a sub-bass lift, yielding clean mids and controlled, generally safe treble; frequency-response databases show the gentle low-end emphasis with even mids. Swapping apex modules can nudge the balance (e.g., M20 a bit more bass, M15 a touch airier) without altering the U12t’s fundamental character. Technical performance remains the calling card: resolution, imaging, layering, and BA-bass quality are repeatedly praised at the top of the class.
Trade-offs are mostly about preference and price: treble can read polite with minor quirks depending on chain and tips, and midrange body is slightly lean versus warmer sets. Given the premium MSRP, overall value hinges on prioritizing top-tier technicalities and long-session comfort via apex.
64 Audio U12T Details
Driver Configuration: 12BA
Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost
Brand: 64 Audio Top 64 Audio IEMs
Price (Msrp): $1,999
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Fort Ears Mefisto Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $2,900
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
64 Audio U12T User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Fort Ears Mefisto User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
64 Audio U12T Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.9Gaming Grade
B+Fort Ears Mefisto Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.9Gaming Grade
B+64 Audio U12T Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.
Average Technical Grade
S-- Expect top-tier articulation, where staging, imaging, and transient control feel effortless. It keeps instruments locked in place effortlessly.
Fort Ears Mefisto Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A+- Expect a tasteful, well-judged response that feels both musical and true to the source. Great synergy with a wide range of genres.
Average Technical Grade
S-- The presentation is crisp and expansive, handling complex passages with impressive ease. Low-level details remain audible in quiet passages.
64 Audio U12T User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFort Ears Mefisto User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFind your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS