7hz Timeless VS Aful Performer 5+2
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
7hz Timeless and Aful Performer 5+2 are in-ear monitors. 7hz Timeless costs $220 while Aful Performer 5+2 costs $229. Aful Performer 5+2 is $9 more expensive. Aful Performer 5+2 holds a decisive 1.5-point edge in reviewer scores (6.1 vs 7.7). Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better bass with a 1.8-point edge, Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better mids with a 2.1-point edge, Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better treble with a 1.9-point edge, Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better dynamics with a 1.6-point edge, Aful Performer 5+2 has better soundstage with a 0.8-point edge, Aful Performer 5+2 has better details with a 0.9-point edge and Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better imaging with a 2.2-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | 7hz Timeless | Aful Performer 5+2 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 6.3 | 8 |
| Mids | 5.9 | 8 |
| Treble | 5.8 | 7.6 |
| Details | 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Soundstage | 7 | 7.8 |
| Imaging | 5.7 | 7.9 |
| Dynamics | 6 | 7.6 |
| Tonality | 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Technicalities | 6.9 | 7.5 |
7hz Timeless Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Aful Performer 5+2 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
7hz Timeless Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Mild V
Brand: 7Hz Top 7Hz IEMs
Price (Msrp): $220
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Aful Performer 5+2 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+4BA+1Planar
Tuning Type: Neutral with bass boost
Brand: AFUL Top AFUL IEMs
Price (Msrp): $229
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
7hz Timeless User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Aful Performer 5+2 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
7hz Timeless Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.7Gaming Grade
B+Aful Performer 5+2 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.5Gaming Grade
A7hz Timeless Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Aful Performer 5+2 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
A- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
7hz Timeless Reviews
7.5
Reviewer Score
Easily the best-tuned planar IEM by a country mile, the Timeless is also no slouch on the technical front. Crin Youtube Channel
6.7
Reviewer Score
Comment: A superb planar IEM, beware the planar bass shelf. The best tuned planar IEM Narrow soundstage, mushy transients
6*
* score normalized
6
Reviewer Score
Great details. Good stage in front but lacking in wideness/3D. Imaging is good and speration is great, but uneven treble peaks. Planar timbre. Vocals and notes can be thin. Fatiguing at higher volume listening. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
6
Reviewer Score
High details for the price, good fun tuning Metallic timbre Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
6
Reviewer Score
Clean, impactful bass, great detail, fast transients. Upper mids are a bit intense, bright treble, planar timbre.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
5.8
Reviewer Score
Has the planar advantage with most of its disadvantages and a reasonable tonality. Precogvision Youtube Channel
5.1
Reviewer Score
Insanely resolving for price. Good planar timbre. Tuning is slight colored but doesn't seem to affect mids as much. Stage depth and width will be the weakest points. QC gamble on first batches. Get S12 instead, imo
Aful Performer 5+2 Reviews
8.5
* score normalized
8.5
Reviewer Score
My kind of neutral, improves a lot on my favorites. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
8*
* score normalized
Overall it is sounding more visceral and incisive than the Performer 5.Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
7.5
Reviewer Score
A detailed, engaging all-rounder that's exciting without being shouty or harsh. Smooth, neutral tuning with a bass boost, excellent bass quality, clean mids, forward vocals, and sparkly, incisive treble. Great detail. I wouldn’t change a thing.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
7
Reviewer Score
check links for more info: Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
6.5
Reviewer Score
Clean, balanced, neutral sound with good layering and tech. Relaxing vocals, but lacks power and last bit of vocal extension. Bass has good controll, but lacks impact. Has sizzly planar timbre in the treble. Safe but forgettable. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
IEMRanking AI
2025-09-07
7.7
Reviewer Score
The AFUL Performer 5+2 (also listed as “Performer 7”) uses a 2DD+4BA+1 micro planar driver array and AFUL’s LC-network crossover plus a 3D-printed acoustic tube system, aiming for clean band splits without smearing. The shell also integrates a high-damping air-pressure balance system, a design AFUL has used across its line. Official listings put MSRP around $229 and outline the same core tech features.
Tonally it trends neutral with a sub-bass lift: bass has solid depth and texture, mids stay relatively linear, and the presence/treble region adds energy without veering into sharpness on most chains. Multiple reviews characterize it as warm-neutral with bass boost or slightly V-shaped depending on perspective, which matches listening notes about a lively but controlled upper end. Sensitivity and load are portable-friendly (≈109 dB, 15 Ω), so it reaches performance without demanding amplification.
Technicalities are competitive for the class: imaging is tidy with good instrument separation, micro-detail retrieval is above average, and soundstage is moderate (more width than depth). Build and comfort are typical resin-shell fare; some users note occasional lower-treble bite depending on tips and recordings, so treble-sensitive listeners may wish to pair accordingly. Overall value is strong at its price, especially if a clean, bass-supported neutral curve is the priority.
7hz Timeless User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewAful Performer 5+2 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review