7hz Timeless VS Binary Dynaquattro
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
7hz Timeless and Binary Dynaquattro are in-ear monitors. 7hz Timeless costs $220 while Binary Dynaquattro costs $260. Binary Dynaquattro is $40 more expensive. Binary Dynaquattro holds a decisive 1.2-point edge in reviewer scores (6.1 vs 7.4). Binary Dynaquattro has slightly better treble with a 0.3-point edge and Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | 7hz Timeless | Binary Dynaquattro |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 6.3 | 7.4 |
| Mids | 5.9 | 6 |
| Treble | 5.8 | 6 |
| Details | 6.7 | 7.4 |
| Soundstage | 7 | 7 |
| Imaging | 5.7 | 7.4 |
| Dynamics | 6 | 8 |
| Tonality | 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Technicalities | 6.9 | 6.8 |
7hz Timeless Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
7hz Timeless Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Mild V
Brand: 7Hz Top 7Hz IEMs
Price (Msrp): $220
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Binary Dynaquattro Details
Driver Configuration: 4DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $260
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
7hz Timeless User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
7hz Timeless Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.7Gaming Grade
B+Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.9Gaming Grade
B+7hz Timeless Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Binary Dynaquattro Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A-- Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
7hz Timeless Reviews
7.5
Reviewer Score
Easily the best-tuned planar IEM by a country mile, the Timeless is also no slouch on the technical front. Crin Youtube Channel
6.7
Reviewer Score
Comment: A superb planar IEM, beware the planar bass shelf. The best tuned planar IEM Narrow soundstage, mushy transients
6*
* score normalized
6
Reviewer Score
Great details. Good stage in front but lacking in wideness/3D. Imaging is good and speration is great, but uneven treble peaks. Planar timbre. Vocals and notes can be thin. Fatiguing at higher volume listening. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
6
Reviewer Score
High details for the price, good fun tuning Metallic timbre Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
6
Reviewer Score
Clean, impactful bass, great detail, fast transients. Upper mids are a bit intense, bright treble, planar timbre.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
5.8
Reviewer Score
Has the planar advantage with most of its disadvantages and a reasonable tonality. Precogvision Youtube Channel
5.1
Reviewer Score
Insanely resolving for price. Good planar timbre. Tuning is slight colored but doesn't seem to affect mids as much. Stage depth and width will be the weakest points. QC gamble on first batches. Get S12 instead, imo
Binary Dynaquattro Reviews
7.8
Reviewer Score
It has great tuning, but lack serverly in some areas. Very fun. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
7.5
Reviewer Score
Shines when driven properly. Excellent bass, vocal-forward tuning, and natural timbre. Hard to drive, could use more treble extension.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
7.2
* score normalized
7
Reviewer Score
Natural vocals, good treble extension, bass is tight and more resolving vs 61t and Davinci. Overall very well balanced and clean. There are some small peaks at 8-10k and 15-20K which can be an issue on some songs, and there is masking around 4-8k region, but overall, solid all-rounder. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
7hz Timeless User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewBinary Dynaquattro User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review