7th Acoustics Asteria VS AFUL Dawn-X

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

7th Acoustics Asteria and AFUL Dawn-X use 1DD+12BA and 1DD+8BA+4EST+1BC driver setups respectively. 7th Acoustics Asteria costs $3,800 while AFUL Dawn-X costs $1,299. 7th Acoustics Asteria is $2,501 more expensive. 7th Acoustics Asteria holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (8.8 vs 8.7). 7th Acoustics Asteria has slightly better bass with a 0.3-point edge, 7th Acoustics Asteria has better mids with a 0.7-point edge, AFUL Dawn-X has slightly better treble with a 0.3-point edge, 7th Acoustics Asteria has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge, 7th Acoustics Asteria has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge and 7th Acoustics Asteria has better imaging with a 0.6-point edge.

Insights

Metric 7th Acoustics Asteria AFUL Dawn-X
Bass 8.8 8.5
Mids 9.2 8.5
Treble 8.6 8.9
Details 8.6 8.5
Soundstage 9 8.5
Imaging 8.6 8
Dynamics 8.5 7.5
Tonality 8.9 8.8
Technicalities 8.4 9.2
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough 7th Acoustics Asteria reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

7th Acoustics Asteria Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Web Search
Bad Guy Good Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

8.8

Excellent


AFUL Dawn-X Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Super* Review
Jays Audio Web Search
Jaytiss Z-Reviews Gizaudio Axel Audionotions Kois Archive Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

8.7

Excellent


Reviews Comparison

7th Acoustics Asteria reviewed by Web Search

2025-09-30
uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8.9 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech

The 7th Acoustics Asteria is a hybrid flagship built around a 10 mm dynamic driver for bass and twelve balanced-armature drivers covering mids through super-treble (5-way crossover), packaged in a CNC aluminum shell and paired with a bespoke LYRA cable. Retailers describe proprietary crossover and treble-loading implementations (EXP / ECHO) aimed at precise integration and high extension, and the run appears limited to 77 units. Pricing varies by market, but a common US MSRP is $3,800.

Tonally, Asteria targets a U-shaped balance: elevated, textured sub-bass, a mildly recessed midrange, and airy upper treble. Frequency-response references and dealer commentary support the emphasis on bass impact and treble “sparkle,” with vocals pushed slightly forward against a relaxed lower-midrange bed. This aligns with FR database traces showing boosted sub-bass and upper-treble energy relative to the center mids.

Technical performance is a core strength: imaging precision, separation, and macrodynamic slam are repeatedly noted, with stage size competitive among current flagships. The trade-off is a midrange that can feel slightly pulled back on timbre-critical content, and the ultra-premium price positions value as conditional on preferring this lively U-shape over neutral targets. Given its execution and cost, Asteria reads as a specialty end-game for listeners seeking visceral bass and airy treble without overt harshness.


Bass: S Mids: S- Treble: S- Dynamics: S Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Web Search

2025-09-18
uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech

The AFUL Dawn-X is a 14-driver quadbrid IEM—1DD+8BA+4EST+1BC—wired together via a six-way electronic + physical crossover and AFUL’s 3D Micro-Resonance acoustic paths; the stabilized-wood shells and included 6N copper cable reinforce its flagship positioning. Specs are published at 15 Ω and 101 dB sensitivity, with an official MSRP of $1,299.99.

Early listening reports describe a balanced-to-U-shaped tuning with textured sub-bass, forward yet clean vocals, and airy treble extension; some note abundant micro-detail that can make the stage feel more intimate on certain tracks. AFUL also claims a “Wideband Electrostatic” implementation letting EST drivers contribute from ~5 kHz upward, which aligns with impressions of crisp but smooth top-end energy.

Objectively, the Dawn-X targets high technical performance—resolution, imaging precision, and treble refinement—more than aggressive coloration, which suits critical listening but may read as slightly cool on some material. Given the price bracket, value hinges on a buyer needing its specific mix of detail retrieval and composure versus similarly ambitious hybrids from rivals at or below the same MSRP.


Bass: S- Mids: A+ Treble: S- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: A+
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your AFUL Dawn-X or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,299

Buy AFUL Dawn-X on HiFiGO

7th Acoustics Asteria (more reviews)

7th Acoustics Asteria reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

2025-09-30
Bad Guy Good Audio 9.1 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech
As technical as a PMG SE but smooth like an RN6 (engaging mids) Flawless for my library
Youtube Video Summary

7th Acoustics Asteria arrives as a limited run of 77 units at around $3,800, presented in a numbered box with premium trimmings. The shells are described as the most beautiful seen in the hobby—shifting, almost bioluminescent blue caps with extended gold trim—and the fit is excellent thanks to a subtle wing. Under the hood sits a 10 mm dynamic driver plus 12 balanced armatures (latest-gen Knowles), with visible multi-tube routing and pressure relief to avoid insertion issues. The accessory suite feels purposefully upscale: a perfectly color-matched and supple cable (no gaudy branding), a structured case (noted as possible animal hide), Final Audio tips, additional tip sets, cleaning tools, stickers, and even a 4.4 mm to 3.5 mm adapter.

Sonically, Asteria is framed as reference-grade yet musical, with detail retrieval and resolution described as almost peerless. It handles a wide library with ease—classic rock, grunge, 90s hip-hop—and while some genres may benefit even more than others, overall performance is characterized as fault-free. Compared with similarly exclusive sets, it avoids the common “expensive but underwhelming” trap; the coherent tuning and technical chops deliver on high expectations without the need for caveats, making this a stunning aesthetic and acoustic package that feels every bit as special as its limited status suggests.

Bass: S Mids: S Treble: A+

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel

7th Acoustics Asteria reviewed by Precogvision

2025-09-17
Precogvision 8.3 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech
Pretty much the closest to a tonal panacea that I've heard only held back by the bass.
Youtube Video Summary

7th Acoustics Asteria prioritizes midrange and treble finesse with only one caveat: the bass isn’t the greatest, presenting a slightly BA-like character with a faintly “farty” mid-bass. The midrange is pure butter, driven by a gentle 2.5 kHz pinna rise followed by a subtle 3.5 kHz bump, keeping it forward yet smooth. A touch of presence around 200–300 Hz adds warmth, while the treble fixes Supernova’s lower-treble heat around 5–6 kHz and pushes extension past 15 kHz.

The result is a presentation that’s buttery yet detailed, with natural imaging and pinpoint precision that screams “godlike tonality.” Value is the sticking point: at roughly $3,800, the proposition isn’t as compelling as Supernova’s, and the overall performance feels closer to the ~$2,000 bracket. For listeners who prioritize tonality and imaging over bass texture and price efficiency, Asteria remains a compelling high-end choice.

Bass: A+ Mids: S+ Treble: S Dynamics: A+ Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X (more reviews)

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-09-18
Jaytiss 9.6 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
This has a really natural midrange, best BC iem I've heard by far.
Youtube Video Summary

Large, sculpted shells with a bulbous rear (housing the bone conductor) make the Aful Dawn-X a substantial fit—comfortable for some, but risky for small ears. The stock cable feels quality but is 4.4 mm-only, and the case/accessories are tidy; importantly, the nozzle grips tips securely (unlike some past AFUL sets). Overall build is handsome and premium, with fit being the main variable.

Sonically, the tuning favors sub-bass over mid-bass, pairs rich mids with smooth, natural treble that avoids harsh spikes yet has mild 4–6 kHz energy, and presents a cohesive, almost speaker-like soundstage. It wakes up with a bit of volume/power, prioritizing clarity, micro-detail and air over outright slam; the bone conductor subtly supports the midrange more than the lows. At $1,300 it’s competitive for listeners chasing technical refinement and a natural tonality, while value seekers or mid-bass lovers may prefer cheaper AFUL options or sets with more punch.

Mids: S Treble: S Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Z-Reviews

2025-10-19
Z-Reviews 9 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X goes straight for spectacle: a $1,300 tribrid behemoth with 14 drivers per side—one dynamic, eight BAs, four electrostats, and a bone conductor—that turns familiar tracks into a surreal remix. The presentation is described as “Poltergeist in an IEM,” with spatial effects that feel like a live DSP engine: four imaginary DJs slicing and reassembling the mix on the fly. Every song becomes an event—an Unreal-Engine-in-a-cave vibe—yet it stays coherent enough to be addictive rather than broken, delivering a wildly unique listen that nothing else in the collection replicates.

Forget reading the squiggle: measurements look “normal,” but the sound is anything but. The stage is huge, imaging is hyper-layered, and transient effects pop out and retract with uncanny tactility—great for ASMR, movies, and games where holographic placement sells the illusion. Despite the driver count, it’s not hard to drive; volume needs are moderate, nowhere near planar-pain territory. This is the “break-glass-when-bored” set—the one to pull out after years in the hobby when everything else feels samey and a jolt of abnormal brilliance is required.

Build and accessories match the price: gargantuan shells with stabilized wooden faceplates, a premium cable, a neat leather strap, and a buffet of individually boxed tips, though termination is a simple 3.5 or 4.4 choice. Ergonomics demand some ear real estate, but the payoff is a sound signature that’s gloriously weird and deeply entertaining. Recommendation: not a first or only IEM—save it for collectors who already have “normal” covered and want a statement piece that rewires how music feels.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

2025-10-11
Gizaudio Axel 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S+ Tech
Balanced all-rounder with fun bass, lifelike mids, very smooth and refined treble, highly resolving and immersive, with great soundstage and precise imaging. Textured, punchy bass, natural mids, ethereal female vocals, smooth, airy, and non-fatiguing treble, top-tier resolution.
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a premium, resin-shelled flagship with a striking red-wood faceplate, a soft 4.4 mm cable, a protective zipper case, and multiple silicone tips. The shells run large but are well-contoured and vented, offering excellent comfort for extended sessions; those with smaller ears should demo first. Build and accessories are solid overall, with only some cable memory above the chin slider worth noting.

Tuning follows a mild V-shape: a moderate, textured bass lift; natural mids with lifelike vocal timbre; and a smooth, extended treble that brings air and detail without harshness. Kicks have weight and EDM carries rumble, yet vocals remain clear; male voices retain grit without thickness, while female vocals sound airy and sweet. Treble presents shimmer and clarity in a non-fatiguing way—ideal for long listens, though not for fans of aggressively boosted highs or outright bass-head needs.

Technical performance is a highlight: resolution, separation, imaging, and stage depth rank among the best at the price, creating immersive layering and precise placement even on busy tracks. Versus AFUL Caner, Dawn-X offers stronger, tighter bass, smoother treble, better comfort, and more refined layering; compared to FiiO’s FX17 and BGVP Solomon, it sounds cleaner, more naturally voiced, and less fatiguing. Against Elleian Apostle, the Apostle hits harder down low, while Dawn-X feels more balanced and immersive. Recommended for those who want a fun-yet-natural, all-rounder flagship with effortless treble and textured mids—less so for meta-leaning bright V tunings or very small ears. Final verdict: 4.5/5, a top contender at its price.


Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Audionotions

2025-09-26
Audionotions 9 Reviewer Score
Slightly warm tilted neutral. Very well balanced with a tasteful bass boost. Bass is surprisingly very weighty and textured with quick decay so bass notes don't linger and overstay their welcome. Lush sounding with very good vocals. Typical AFUL pinna gain region which, as expected, results in very pleasant female vocals that aren't in your face and aren't shouty. Treble is very well extended with a good amount of shimmer and air but at the same time it never gets sibilant. In fact, I'd say treble is silky smooth. Imaging is crisp and realistic with fantastic instrument separation. The stage is enveloping, with good depth and width but it's not excessively large - overall it sounds very natural, with distinctly noticeable layering. Very good technicalities. This is the peak of the AFUL house sound and to date the most natural sounding flagship IEM I've heard. Where a lot of $1k+ IEMs rely on gimmicky tuning to make them sound more impressive, which comes at the cost of sacrificing timbre - the Dawn X sounds natural throughout the frequency response. Build quality is great - the stabilized wood shells are nice. Unfortunately the overall look of the IEM is contentious - the red color doesn't pop much and the AFUL branding on the earpieces is objectively a detractor - if they put Dawn-X on the earpieces, I suspect AFUL would see a huge lift in sales. Nonetheless, these are the best sounding IEMs I've tried to date.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 9 Reviewer Score
S+ Tuning
S+ Tech
Rating: S+ | Value: ⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮🎮 | Comfort: 6 natural midrange. ethereal treble. totl techs. rip small ears
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a 12-driver quad-brid flagship (1 DD, 8 BA, 4 EST, 1 bone conduction) priced at $1,300. The unboxing mirrors AFUL’s higher-end sets: big leather case, cable clip, four ear-tip sets, cleaning brush, plus a soft but slightly memory-prone cable available in 3.5 or 4.4—and given the set’s power hunger, 4.4 makes sense. Design skews conservative: a red stabilized-wood faceplate paired with a plain black shell that doesn’t showcase the intricate internals. The shell is also very large (think Monarch-sized), creating comfort issues; small ears will struggle. Tip sensitivity is high, and stock tips provide the most balanced result.

Tonally this is classic AFUL house sound: a mild V with a slightly warm, musical tilt that remains balanced overall. Bass hits with punch, texture, and sub-bass rumble without bloat—ample enough for bass fans yet controlled. The midrange is a standout: natural, lush vocals with male voices gaining a touch from the warmth and female vocals kept more neutral, preserving timbral authenticity and emotional nuance. Treble is rich, smooth, and well-extended; the ESTs are tuned tastefully—no harsh glare—adding just the right air and sparkle. The bone-conduction driver focuses on mids and stays subtle in practice.

Technically, Dawn-X competes with top peers: high resolution, excellent separation, and rare cohesion for a multi-driver design. Imaging and layering feel strikingly realistic, while stage favors depth over width (wider sets like Fatfreq Quantum still outspread it). As a recommendation, it suits listeners seeking a slightly warm, highly detailed, all-rounder; it’s not ideal for small ears, lean-bass preferences, or those wanting brighter upper-mids/treble. Despite strong diminishing returns above mid-fi prices, Dawn-X punches above its tag and earns a rare two-star recommendation from Kois Archive—a flagship that feels genuinely special if the fit works.


Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Jays Audio

2025-09-28
Jays Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S- Tech
Smooth treble, natural timbre, good sub-bass focused set, but transients can be a bit soft, and vocals are pulled back lacking final extension - non-fatiguing but not very engaging and "dynamic". A bassier 5+2 with smoother/more natural treble. Reminds me of the Luna but less mid-bass/vocals, more sub, and a little smoother. Bassy all-rounder like MK4 bass switch but with pulled back vocals, and less versatile since no switch option.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Super* Review

2025-09-23
Super* Review 7* * score rescaled + normalized
Super Review says AFUL’s Dawn-X is the brand’s best execution of its house sound yet—a $1,300 flagship tribrid with 14 drivers (DD + 8 BA + 4 EST + bone conduction) that fits comfortably and consistently. The tuning is warm and bass-weighted but tight and fast, with precise, slightly assertive treble; staging isn’t very wide but has good front-to-back depth and strong clarity. Versus peers like FiiO FX17, 64 Audio U4s, Dunu Glacier, and Monarch MK4, it favors control and bass quality over maximum width or excitement; he calls it very good but evolutionary and rates it 3/5 stars.
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL’s house sound shows up here in its most polished form: Dawn-X is a tribrid (1DD + 8BA + 4EST + bone conduction) flagship at $1,300 that prioritizes consistent fit and execution over flash. Build is understated with stabilized-wood faceplates, above-average isolation, and a medium/medium-large shell that fits better—and more consistently—than the Cantor. The accessory loadout is solid (four silicone tip sets, large but well-made case), though the stock cable does not have swappable terminations (choose 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm).

Tonally, it’s a balanced, warmer-leaning take on AFUL’s signature: a dense, controlled bass that borders on decadent yet stays quick and clean, slightly relaxed mids, and a precise, mildly forward lower-treble that keeps definition high without tipping into harshness for most listeners. Stage favors front-to-back depth over width; transients are clean and a touch clinical, giving strong separation without sounding smeary. The result is a mature, confident presentation that reads refined rather than showy.

Against peers: versus Cantor, Dawn-X is warmer, smoother, and far more consistent thanks to fit; Cantor can sound brighter and a bit wider. Compared with FiiO FX17, Dawn-X has tighter bass and crisper treble, where FX17 feels looser and fuller. The 64 Audio U4s plays softer and wider; Dawn-X is more precise/clinical. DUNU Glacier hits harder and more V-shaped with smoother treble but less natural acoustic timbre; Dawn-X sounds truer on instruments. Versus ThieAudio Monarch MK4, MK4 is more neutral, vocal-forward with greater width, while Dawn-X offers denser low-end and a calmer demeanor—and a friendlier fit for many ears. Verdict: 3/5 stars—not the flashiest in its bracket, but arguably AFUL’s best execution yet of its signature sound.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 9 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the AFUL DAWN-X at an average of 5.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Masterpiece.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

7th Acoustics Asteria User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

AFUL Dawn-X User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

7th Acoustics Asteria Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

AFUL Dawn-X Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.1

Gaming Grade

A+

7th Acoustics Asteria Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Tonal balance reaches a highly refined state, sounding seamless from lows to highs. Everything locks together with satisfying coherence.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • A very capable technical display delivers articulate layers and poised imaging. It portrays reverbs and echoes with confidence.
Bass S-
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids S
The midrange defines perfection, reproducing every nuance with effortless authority. Textures are rendered with absolute conviction.
Treble S-
It delivers superb treble brilliance that stays pure even in complex passages. It adds excitement while staying pure.
Dynamics S-
Dynamic range is superb, blending powerful impact with nuanced control. It captures both whisper and roar effortlessly.
Soundstage S
Venue reproduction feels transcendent, portraying a limitless hall with absolute positional certainty. Imaging remains rock solid at all times.
Details S-
Complex productions unravel completely, letting you examine every thread. Textures are rendered with exquisite finesse.
Imaging S-
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

AFUL Dawn-X Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Tonal balance reaches a highly refined state, sounding seamless from lows to highs. Everything locks together with satisfying coherence.

Average Technical Grade

S
  • Expect an effortlessly clean presentation that keeps complex mixes perfectly organized. There is zero sense of congestion even at high volume.
Bass S-
Expect a gripping low-end presence that marries clarity with visceral impact. Dynamic swings land with thrilling force.
Mids S-
The midrange sounds refined and revealing, balancing clarity with emotional weight. Timbre accuracy rivals studio monitors.
Treble S-
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics A
The system snaps into action with precision, highlighting every swell. Recordings feel energetic and alive.
Soundstage S-
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Details S-
No subtlety is too small; the presentation exposes it all with composure. Complex tracks remain crystal clear.
Imaging A+
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Premium pricing warrants consideration of gaming-first alternatives for lower cost

7th Acoustics Asteria User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

AFUL Dawn-X User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer