Aful Cantor and Campfire Moon Rover are in-ear monitors. Aful Cantor costs $800 while Campfire Moon Rover costs $1,199. Campfire Moon Rover is $399 more expensive. Campfire Moon Rover holds a decisive 1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.8 vs 8.8). Aful Cantor carries a user score of 8.5. Campfire Moon Rover has significantly better mids with a 1.3-point edge, Aful Cantor has significantly better treble with a 1.8-point edge, Campfire Moon Rover has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge and Aful Cantor has significantly better soundstage with a 1.3-point edge.
Insights
Metric | Aful Cantor | Campfire Moon Rover |
---|---|---|
Bass | 8 | 8.8 |
Mids | 7.8 | 9 |
Treble | 8.8 | 7 |
Details | 9 | 8.8 |
Soundstage | 8.3 | 7 |
Imaging | 8.5 | 8.8 |
Dynamics | 5 | 7 |
Tonality | 7.6 | 7.5 |
Technicalities | 8.9 | 7 |
Aful Cantor Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.8Strongly Favorable
Campfire Moon Rover Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
8.8Excellent
Reviews Comparison
Aful Cantor reviewed by Jaytiss
The AFUL Cantor delivers a balanced and neutral sound signature, praised for its exceptional upper air, treble extension, and pristine clarity. While the bass offers sufficient dynamics without being thunderous, and female vocals sound natural, some listeners might desire a touch more punch in the upper mids (around 2-3kHz) and find a slight peak in the 4-6kHz region occasionally noticeable. The premium build quality stands out, featuring a unique and stunning "star night" face plate, a thick but comfortable shell with a slender nozzle, and excellent accessories. These include a slightly microphonic but otherwise nice-looking flat two-pin cable and an exceptionally plush case typically found on far more expensive IEMs.
Graph comparisons reveal the Cantor's tuning shares similarities with models like the Moondrop Blessing 2: Dusk and the AFUL Explorer, but it distinguishes itself with superior detail retrieval and dynamics. It competes impressively against significantly pricier offerings like the Elysian Annihilator in technical performance, offering a smoother presentation with slightly less sub-bass focus. The overall sonic presentation is described as sophisticated, refined, and highly engaging, creating a sense of music surrounding the listener. Minor tuning preferences aside – wishing for a bit more upper mid presence and slightly less energy around 4-6kHz and 8kHz – the core sound quality is highly regarded.
Representing strong sonic value despite its price point, the Cantor earns a high ranking for its unique and beautiful design, premium feel, and exceptional technical performance. While acknowledging excellent cheaper options like the AFUL Explorer exist, the Cantor justifies its cost with its detailed, airy presentation and overall package. It's highly recommended for those seeking a neutral, high-performing IEM, though a demo is advised given the investment. Ultimately, the AFUL Cantor is considered a treasure, fulfilling over a year of anticipation with its beautiful aesthetics and uniquely engaging sound.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Campfire Moon Rover reviewed by Jaytiss
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Aful Cantor reviewed by Super* Review
The AFUL Cantor lands as a flagship all-BA set with 14 balanced armatures at $800, packaged with a great-handling nylon cable and a handsome shell. The catch is fit: a very long nozzle with a metal insert demands a deep insertion, and comfort varies widely; AFUL’s stock tips are essentially required to keep that nozzle from poking and to restore some flex. Build and presentation impress, but the ear-fit can be fussy and the shells tend to stick out.
Tuning trends U-shaped: a lower-mid dip into a hefty sub-bass boost, relaxed upper mids, and noticeable upper-treble energy. When seated correctly, the set delivers crisp transients with a touch of “planar-like” pluck, good imaging, and clean BA bass that favors electronic thump over kick-drum slam; with the wrong tip or depth it swings to brittle/bright or muted. The midrange can read a bit thin, so the contrast comes more from bass/treble edges than from vocal saturation.
Compared with Symphonium Helios, both are all-BA and graph-adjacent, but Helios leans vocal-forward and smooth while Cantor is the more contrasty, fun listen that trades mid presence for excitement. Net: technically capable and competitive when dialed in, yet compromised by comfort and tip dependence. Final verdict: 3/5 stars—a better match for listeners with deep pockets and deep ears.
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube ChannelCampfire Moon Rover reviewed by Super* Review
Campfire’s Moon Rover pairs a 12 mm planar with a compact titanium shell and a premium—but slightly quirky—accessory spread: a real-leather wallet-style case, a thin yet memory-prone cable (MMCX), and tidy branding extras. The heat-treated, rainbow finish reads more like pre-distressed denim than authentic patina, but fit and comfort are excellent despite sharp-looking edges, especially with shallow tips (e.g., Spring Tips). Measurements showed visible channel mismatch on the graph, though not audible in practice.
Sonically it’s a warm-neutral midrange with recessed upper-mids and an elevated treble that can verge on bright or splashy if the seal isn’t right, trading absolute smoothness for micro-contrast, crisp imaging, and a subtly “sandy” texture that gives an almost ASMR quality. Bass stays taut rather than big. Versus Campfire’s Ara/Andromeda-era shell mates, Moon Rover sounds more natural and less colored; against 64 Audio’s Solo planar it’s less bass-forward but more distinctive. At $1,200 there’s fiercer technical value elsewhere, yet this is the most compelling Campfire IEM in years—4/5 stars for a unique, textured listen that rewards good fit and treble tolerance.
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube ChannelAful Cantor (more reviews)
Aful Cantor reviewed by Z-Reviews
This is AFUL’s flagship science project: the Cantor packs 14 BAs per side (28 total) and a heap of buzzword tech—Dual-Channel Acoustic Maze for sub-bass, non-destructive direct-drive topology, and multi-dimensional crossover trickery that reads like Star Trek schematics. The housing even extends a stainless-steel nozzle to the tip’s end to bypass tip coloration—smart for consistency, dicey for ears with wide-bore silicones. Stick to the stock silicones or better yet foams to calm treble and avoid any scrape-risk.
Sonically it’s a hyper-resolving analyzer: every band is so present that volume tends to go down, not up, and mediocre recordings get roasted on the spot. Imaging is precise but a bit less cohesive than simpler sets; stage stays as the track dictates, while separation feels like a mixing desk with 14 faders. The sub-bass dives shockingly deep for an all-BA—think whisper-low “whoomp”—yet it isn’t a bass-monster; overall balance leans revealing rather than lush.
Pairing matters: clinical amps make it razor-edged, while warmer sources (R2R, iFi, RME-ish) and foam tips smooth it into addictive detail. At $800 it isn’t the one IEM to rule them all; it’s the specialist tool for listeners who want to dissect space, mic technique, and mix decisions—more control room than mosh pit. Cable and case are solid (4.4 mm balanced), and a tuning switch would have been nice, but for the right kind of nerd this thing lets you become the squig.
Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Aful Cantor reviewed by Shuwa-T
Aful Cantor reviewed by Audionotions
Aful Cantor reviewed by Gizaudio Axel
Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube ChannelAful Cantor reviewed by Jays Audio
The Aful Cantor presents a complex and frustrating case, offering what might be some of the most detailed and resolving performance under $1,000. The clarity, separation, and sheer resolution are described as "pretty nuts," positioning the Cantor as a potential benchmark for technical ability. It delivers a clean, smooth, light, and airy sound signature with a bass that is very fast, lean, and features a tight sub-bass rumble. At lower volumes, this presentation is highly enjoyable and non-fatiguing, making it exceptionally good for critical, quiet listening sessions where its technical prowess can shine without drawback.
However, this technical marvel comes with a significant and unusual caveat: it is physically fatiguing to the point of causing headaches and a ringing sensation in the temples after only 15-30 minutes of listening at moderate volumes (around 70-80 dB). This is not a fit or nozzle issue, but rather an inherent property of the IEM itself. The problem manifests as a shrill and overly intense quality in the treble at higher volumes, accompanied by a metallic timbre on tracks with lots of cymbals, making it unsuitable for energetic genres like K-pop, J-pop, or EDM. This shrillness is not fully solved by EQ and is believed to be related to the driver design, nozzle, or venting rather than just the tuning.
When compared to peers, the Cantor is more resolving than the warmer, fuller, and smoother Letshuoer Supernova but falls short of its natural timbre. It also can't match the Monarch MK3 as an all-rounder, which offers a more impactful bass, better vocals, and a smoother, more engaging experience. The Cantor's vocals are also a weak point, being recessed, light, and borderline thin. The final recommendation is to definitely demo these first; they are only easy to recommend for those who listen at very low volumes (under 60 dB) and are not sensitive to treble intensity, as its scaling at normal listening levels is poor.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Aful Cantor Details
Driver Configuration: 14BA
Tuning Type: Vocal-focused
Brand: AFUL Top AFUL IEMs
Price (Msrp): $800
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Campfire Moon Rover Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Warm
Brand: Campfire Top Campfire IEMs
Price (Msrp): $1,199
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Aful Cantor User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score:
Based on 2 user reviews
8.5Excellent
Campfire Moon Rover User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Aful Cantor Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
8Gaming Grade
A+Campfire Moon Rover Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.2Gaming Grade
BAful Cantor Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
S-- Excellent clarity and detail. Precise imaging and expansive soundstage. Manages complex passages with minimal smearing and good transient speed.
Campfire Moon Rover Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Aful Cantor User Reviews
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewExcellent overall clarity and imaging, though fit demands can be a deal-breaker
Pros
Tonally balanced signature with superb detail retrievalCons
Requires deep insertion and has a large shell that may challenge fit for someWell-rounded flagship IEM with refined tuning and tech for the money.
Pros
Exceptional clarity and tonal balance that punches above its price bracket.Cons
Requires precise tip fit for best performance and subtle treble can be fatiguing at high volumes.Campfire Moon Rover User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFind your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS