Aful Cantor VS Dunu Mirai

Youtube Video Summary

This is AFUL’s flagship science project: the Cantor packs 14 BAs per side (28 total) and a heap of buzzword tech—Dual-Channel Acoustic Maze for sub-bass, non-destructive direct-drive topology, and multi-dimensional crossover trickery that reads like Star Trek schematics. The housing even extends a stainless-steel nozzle to the tip’s end to bypass tip coloration—smart for consistency, dicey for ears with wide-bore silicones. Stick to the stock silicones or better yet foams to calm treble and avoid any scrape-risk.

Sonically it’s a hyper-resolving analyzer: every band is so present that volume tends to go down, not up, and mediocre recordings get roasted on the spot. Imaging is precise but a bit less cohesive than simpler sets; stage stays as the track dictates, while separation feels like a mixing desk with 14 faders. The sub-bass dives shockingly deep for an all-BA—think whisper-low “whoomp”—yet it isn’t a bass-monster; overall balance leans revealing rather than lush.

Pairing matters: clinical amps make it razor-edged, while warmer sources (R2R, iFi, RME-ish) and foam tips smooth it into addictive detail. At $800 it isn’t the one IEM to rule them all; it’s the specialist tool for listeners who want to dissect space, mic technique, and mix decisions—more control room than mosh pit. Cable and case are solid (4.4 mm balanced), and a tuning switch would have been nice, but for the right kind of nerd this thing lets you become the squig.

Youtube Video Summary

Dunu Mirai comes as a headphones.com exclusive seven-driver hybrid—1DD + multiple BA with a super tweeter—priced around $950–$1,000. The tuning sits a few clicks toward the analytical side without abandoning fun: crisp, clean, and ruthlessly revealing of recordings and chain noise. Expect intimate staging, surgical separation, and a bass response that’s tight rather than head-rattling (forget any “+11 dB” slam claims in practice). Feed it a noisy amp or a bad master and it will tell on you; give it quality and it layers beautifully.

Build is a mixed bag: the green shells are chunky and a bit plain for the price, but ergonomics and nozzles work well. The included DUNU modular cable is light, comfy, and well-executed, and—bless—this one uses 2-pin. Accessory spread is generous (SS tips, “candy” tips, case, adapters). Still, aesthetics won’t scream “kilobuck,” which may irk some.

Tuning is the story: this is a precision instrument that doesn’t sugarcoat, closer to a studio mindset than a party trick. Tip rolling (e.g., foam-silicone hybrids) can nudge low-end weight and bring the midrange forward for a more emotive hit without breaking its composure. It stands apart from DUNU’s Glacier—the two make a complementary pair: Glacier for relaxed, expansive chills; Mirai for focused detail and truth-telling. Verdict: a full pass for listeners who want refinement and honesty over gloss, and who can curate their library and source to match.

Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Cantor delivers a balanced and neutral sound signature, praised for its exceptional upper air, treble extension, and pristine clarity. While the bass offers sufficient dynamics without being thunderous, and female vocals sound natural, some listeners might desire a touch more punch in the upper mids (around 2-3kHz) and find a slight peak in the 4-6kHz region occasionally noticeable. The premium build quality stands out, featuring a unique and stunning "star night" face plate, a thick but comfortable shell with a slender nozzle, and excellent accessories. These include a slightly microphonic but otherwise nice-looking flat two-pin cable and an exceptionally plush case typically found on far more expensive IEMs.

Graph comparisons reveal the Cantor's tuning shares similarities with models like the Moondrop Blessing 2: Dusk and the AFUL Explorer, but it distinguishes itself with superior detail retrieval and dynamics. It competes impressively against significantly pricier offerings like the Elysian Annihilator in technical performance, offering a smoother presentation with slightly less sub-bass focus. The overall sonic presentation is described as sophisticated, refined, and highly engaging, creating a sense of music surrounding the listener. Minor tuning preferences aside – wishing for a bit more upper mid presence and slightly less energy around 4-6kHz and 8kHz – the core sound quality is highly regarded.

Representing strong sonic value despite its price point, the Cantor earns a high ranking for its unique and beautiful design, premium feel, and exceptional technical performance. While acknowledging excellent cheaper options like the AFUL Explorer exist, the Cantor justifies its cost with its detailed, airy presentation and overall package. It's highly recommended for those seeking a neutral, high-performing IEM, though a demo is advised given the investment. Ultimately, the AFUL Cantor is considered a treasure, fulfilling over a year of anticipation with its beautiful aesthetics and uniquely engaging sound.

Youtube Video Summary

Build quality and presentation are the Mirai’s calling cards: a premium cable, a robust case, and those quirky little IEM booties make for an unboxing experience that feels luxury at its price. Sonically, it sketches a spacious, almost holographic stage where higher voices shine, drums hit with conviction, and guitars sound convincingly natural. The trouble starts lower down: bass and alto vocals can feel thin, with a mid-bass dip that leaves some tracks lacking body; strings on certain orchestral pieces skew sharp or plasticky, and there’s an ~8 kHz glare that can bite. Metal and electronic are a treat; well-recorded R&B is a poor match.

EQ—whether to Precog’s target or a similar in-house curve—fills in mid-bass and steadies the balance, but it raises the question of whether a pricey set should require tweaks. In context, Supernova offers flatter treble and fuller mids, Monarch MKIII brings livelier dynamics and a safer overall tone, and the Binary Chopin delivers a more consistently “fun” V-shape with fewer problem tracks. Mirai ultimately suits big-spending listeners who value build and staging panache over benchmark value; mid-tier collectors may find stronger all-rounders elsewhere. Verdict: a solid 4-star recommendation with a pure audio score of 8.9—impressive on the ears, if not the outright class leader for the money.

Youtube Video Summary

The Aful Cantor presents a complex and frustrating case, offering what might be some of the most detailed and resolving performance under $1,000. The clarity, separation, and sheer resolution are described as "pretty nuts," positioning the Cantor as a potential benchmark for technical ability. It delivers a clean, smooth, light, and airy sound signature with a bass that is very fast, lean, and features a tight sub-bass rumble. At lower volumes, this presentation is highly enjoyable and non-fatiguing, making it exceptionally good for critical, quiet listening sessions where its technical prowess can shine without drawback.

However, this technical marvel comes with a significant and unusual caveat: it is physically fatiguing to the point of causing headaches and a ringing sensation in the temples after only 15-30 minutes of listening at moderate volumes (around 70-80 dB). This is not a fit or nozzle issue, but rather an inherent property of the IEM itself. The problem manifests as a shrill and overly intense quality in the treble at higher volumes, accompanied by a metallic timbre on tracks with lots of cymbals, making it unsuitable for energetic genres like K-pop, J-pop, or EDM. This shrillness is not fully solved by EQ and is believed to be related to the driver design, nozzle, or venting rather than just the tuning.

When compared to peers, the Cantor is more resolving than the warmer, fuller, and smoother Letshuoer Supernova but falls short of its natural timbre. It also can't match the Monarch MK3 as an all-rounder, which offers a more impactful bass, better vocals, and a smoother, more engaging experience. The Cantor's vocals are also a weak point, being recessed, light, and borderline thin. The final recommendation is to definitely demo these first; they are only easy to recommend for those who listen at very low volumes (under 60 dB) and are not sensitive to treble intensity, as its scaling at normal listening levels is poor.

Youtube Video Summary

Treble-forward without being a razor blade—that’s the Dunu Mirai’s vibe. Sparkly highs with notable peaks around 4 kHz, 8 kHz, and past 10 kHz inject energy, immediacy, and sharper imaging than smoother sets like Supernova. Vocals are clean, airy, and extended with no lower-mid bleed, giving indie/alternative tracks a lively “facelift,” though the same brightness can turn fatiguing on already hot mixes (EDM, J-/K-pop) and encourages lower listening volumes on those genres.

Bass is rumbly and punchy in the sub-bass but light on mid-bass weight, so rock benefits more from sets like Zen Top or SA6 Mk II. Technicals are strong—resolution, layering, and imaging keep pace with pricier peers; versus Monarch MK3 and LTD, Mirai sounds brightest and most exciting, while MK3 has better bass texture/more natural vocals and LTD offers airier staging with smoother treble. Compared to Harmon/diffuse-field staples (Top, Studio 4, E7M), Mirai pulls a touch more detail but is brighter. It’s essentially a more technical, bass-enhanced take on Blessing 3 / Simgot EA1000—yet at $1,100, the value debate is real, especially with unit variance and a somewhat plasticky backside (nice cable/case, though). Best for listeners seeking a lively, detail-first upgrade to EA1000/Blessing 3; not a treble-head special, not a do-everything allrounder.

Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Cantor lands as a flagship all-BA set with 14 balanced armatures at $800, packaged with a great-handling nylon cable and a handsome shell. The catch is fit: a very long nozzle with a metal insert demands a deep insertion, and comfort varies widely; AFUL’s stock tips are essentially required to keep that nozzle from poking and to restore some flex. Build and presentation impress, but the ear-fit can be fussy and the shells tend to stick out.

Tuning trends U-shaped: a lower-mid dip into a hefty sub-bass boost, relaxed upper mids, and noticeable upper-treble energy. When seated correctly, the set delivers crisp transients with a touch of “planar-like” pluck, good imaging, and clean BA bass that favors electronic thump over kick-drum slam; with the wrong tip or depth it swings to brittle/bright or muted. The midrange can read a bit thin, so the contrast comes more from bass/treble edges than from vocal saturation.

Compared with Symphonium Helios, both are all-BA and graph-adjacent, but Helios leans vocal-forward and smooth while Cantor is the more contrasty, fun listen that trades mid presence for excitement. Net: technically capable and competitive when dialed in, yet compromised by comfort and tip dependence. Final verdict: 3/5 stars—a better match for listeners with deep pockets and deep ears.

Youtube Video Summary

Dunu x Precogvision Mirai arrives after years of iteration, priced at $1,100 with a hybrid array—1DD + 6BA and an unusual open-back tweeter. The earpieces wear a handsome green finish and ship (retail) with a matching white cable and swappable terminations. Fit can be contentious: a more generic shell and a long nozzle may require tip rolling; shorter, spin-fit-style tips helped achieve seal and comfort without pushing the nozzle too deep.

Tonally, Mirai blends a leaner lower-midrange and sub-bass emphasis (think Helios-style low end) with a relaxed upper-mid à la 64 Audio. The result avoids sounding thin, delivering taut, weighty bass, excellent imaging, and incisive instrument separation with convincing front-to-back depth. The weak spot is treble timbre: cymbals and highs can skew a touch digital/crunchy, and while tips can tame it somewhat, the top end isn’t perfectly natural.

Versus 64 Audio U4s, Mirai is the sharper, tighter listen with stronger imaging, while U4s plays warmer, smoother, denser but a bit blurred by comparison. Against ThieAudio Monarch MkII, Mirai offers fuller bass and body, whereas Monarch is brighter, more forward with a notably smoother treble and slightly higher apparent resolution—but can feel thinner and has its own fit quirks. Overall, Mirai earns a solid 4/5: a distinctive, future-leaning tuning that trades blows at its price, with caveats on fit and treble polish.

Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Cantor is a 14-BA, ~$800 set that looks premium and shows off its acoustic maze tubing through a semi-transparent shell, with faceplates in Star Knight or Marine Echo. The fit can be tricky: a long metal nozzle wants a deep insertion, and short tips won’t seal; longer tips like SoftEars Ultra Clear or Dunu S&S keep the nozzle covered and the tonality stable. The stock nylon cable feels nice but is very microphonic, making a swap advisable. Measurement quirks from shallow insertion are misleading—proper deep fit removes the apparent treble spike and reflects what’s actually heard.

Tuning follows the AFUL house sound: a mild U-shape, fairly neutral with a brightish tilt. The maze tech gives BA bass surprising decay and texture, with neutral mid-bass and a touch more sub-bass focus—close to a DD feel, if not identical. Mids sit clean; female vocals sound natural and sweetened by the steady rise through the upper-mids, while a gentle ~300 Hz dip makes male vocals and lower-octave instruments a bit lean. Treble is smooth yet energetic, with standout extension (impressively achieved without ESTs); it hovers near the upper tolerance for brightness but remains controlled with the right tips.

Technical performance is where Cantor shines: top-tier resolution, precise imaging, and a notably wide soundstage—great for detail retrieval and gaming, where positional cues pop (think footstep clarity in FPS titles). Versus Performer 7, Cantor trades P7’s fuller low-mids and better male vocals for cleaner female vocals and a more even treble. Against 64 Audio U12t, Cantor’s bass quality impresses, its mids differ (U12t’s 3 kHz dip adds sweetness but can feel odd), and Cantor’s treble sounds smoother; both resolve at a very high level, with Cantor edging imaging and stage width. Overall: an excellent but not universal pick—cable microphonics, deep-fit demands, and slightly thin lower mids mean careful matching to preferences. For detail lovers with female-vocal libraries who tolerate a brighter treble, it earns a one-star recommendation; others may prefer alternatives in this bracket.

Youtube Video Summary

AFUL’s $800 flagship pushes hard on engineering: 14 balanced armatures, a five-way network, 3D-printed shells, and the brand’s acoustic maze that coaxes unusually textured, dynamic-driver-like bass out of an all-BA setup. Packaging is “classic AFUL”—nice case, multiple tip sets, cleaning brush—but light for the price, and the cloth-sheathed cable, while beautifully machined and very low resistance, is highly microphonic. The big talking point is the metal nozzle extension: tips must be pushed down to the rim for a deep fit, which optimizes tonality and treble smoothness. Comfort varies wildly by ear; some report irritation, and the long nozzle feels fragile if dropped.

Sonically, this is AFUL’s house sound elevated: a slightly warm-neutral balance with clean, meaty lows, natural mids, and an upper-mid/treble that sits right on the edge—silky and detailed with a deep fit, but bright and fatiguing if worn shallow or with the wrong tips. It is extremely revealing of mastering quality, rewarding good recordings with elite microdetail, imaging, and a huge, tall stage that can hang with far pricier sets. A mild impedance adapter (or higher-Z source) can warm the tone and shave some air, though at a small cost to sparkle and openness.

Against AFUL’s own lineup, the closest kin is the Performer 7: similar flavor, less resolution and scale, but a far better value. Cantor is the brand’s “thesis statement”—the most complete execution of its tuning—with true summit-fi technicals at a mid-summit price. Still, it carries caveats: fit sensitivity, that microphonic cable, and accessory stinginess. Recommended only if the budget is comfortable, a deep, stable fit is achievable and comfortable for long sessions, and AFUL’s warm-neutral house sound already hits the spot; for everyone else, the P7 or Explorer make safer picks.