Aful Cantor VS Nicehck Rockies

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Aful Cantor and Nicehck Rockies use 14BA and 1DD+2BA+2EST driver setups respectively. Aful Cantor costs $800 while Nicehck Rockies costs $499. Aful Cantor is $301 more expensive. Nicehck Rockies holds a slight 0.4-point edge in reviewer scores (7.8 vs 8.1). User ratings place Aful Cantor at 8.5 and Nicehck Rockies at 9. Nicehck Rockies has better bass with a 0.6-point edge, Nicehck Rockies has better mids with a 0.9-point edge, Aful Cantor has better treble with a 0.5-point edge, Nicehck Rockies has significantly better dynamics with a 2.4-point edge, Aful Cantor has significantly better details with a 1.5-point edge and Aful Cantor has significantly better imaging with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Aful Cantor Nicehck Rockies
Bass 8 8.6
Mids 7.8 8.7
Treble 8.8 8.3
Details 9 7.5
Soundstage 8.3 8.2
Imaging 8.5 7.5
Dynamics 5 7.4
Tonality 7.6 8.6
Technicalities 8.9 8.7

Aful Cantor Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Super* Review
Jays Audio
Z-Reviews Jaytiss Shuwa-T Audionotions Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

7.8

Strongly Favorable


Nicehck Rockies Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Super* Review
IEMRanking AI
Fox Told Me So Audionotions Jays Audio Tim Tuned
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

8.1

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

Aful Cantor reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S Tech
Maybe best detailed set, fit is extremely difficult.

The AFUL Cantor delivers a balanced and neutral sound signature, praised for its exceptional upper air, treble extension, and pristine clarity. While the bass offers sufficient dynamics without being thunderous, and female vocals sound natural, some listeners might desire a touch more punch in the upper mids (around 2-3kHz) and find a slight peak in the 4-6kHz region occasionally noticeable. The premium build quality stands out, featuring a unique and stunning "star night" face plate, a thick but comfortable shell with a slender nozzle, and excellent accessories. These include a slightly microphonic but otherwise nice-looking flat two-pin cable and an exceptionally plush case typically found on far more expensive IEMs.

Graph comparisons reveal the Cantor's tuning shares similarities with models like the Moondrop Blessing 2: Dusk and the AFUL Explorer, but it distinguishes itself with superior detail retrieval and dynamics. It competes impressively against significantly pricier offerings like the Elysian Annihilator in technical performance, offering a smoother presentation with slightly less sub-bass focus. The overall sonic presentation is described as sophisticated, refined, and highly engaging, creating a sense of music surrounding the listener. Minor tuning preferences aside – wishing for a bit more upper mid presence and slightly less energy around 4-6kHz and 8kHz – the core sound quality is highly regarded.

Representing strong sonic value despite its price point, the Cantor earns a high ranking for its unique and beautiful design, premium feel, and exceptional technical performance. While acknowledging excellent cheaper options like the AFUL Explorer exist, the Cantor justifies its cost with its detailed, airy presentation and overall package. It's highly recommended for those seeking a neutral, high-performing IEM, though a demo is advised given the investment. Ultimately, the AFUL Cantor is considered a treasure, fulfilling over a year of anticipation with its beautiful aesthetics and uniquely engaging sound.

Mids: A+ Treble: S Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-09-03
Jaytiss 9.4 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S Tech
Trebble so nice. Feels faultless and amazing.

NiceHCK Rockies lands in the ~$500 bracket with a 1DD+2BA+2EST setup and a surprisingly premium package. The hollow resin shell feels solid, with a metal nozzle, slightly recessed 2-pin, good isolation, and comfy fit. The swappable-termination cable is thick, pliant, and lays flat—no chin slider out of the box, but easy to add—and the excellent case and tip kit push the accessories into “above class” territory.

Tonally, Rockies goes for tight, controlled bass and a natural midrange, capped by upper-treble that’s sparkly yet refined—detailed without getting shouty or brittle. The graph reads largely flat with a tasteful treble lift, translating to a clean, clear presentation that stays engaging rather than fatiguing. It comes across as an “instant classic” tuning: lively, airy, but still grounded.

Compared with brand siblings (DB2 too upper-midsy; F1 Pro/NX8 fine but not special), Rockies feels like the step up. Versus peers, it splits the difference: more air and delicacy than RSV MK2 (which is bassier/darker), less sizzle than sets that chase treble for effect, and broadly similar endgame vibes to “good” units of Mega5-EST—variance there being the rub. Net: a high-value pick at its price, worthy of a Gold Star—not a universal “benchmark,” but a sweet, natural, clear listen that many will prefer, especially with the standout accessories.

Mids: S Treble: S Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S-

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Aful Cantor reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8 Reviewer Score
Very well balanced with very good details and separation. Bass is punchy and fast, mids are clean with excellent instrument separation, treble is well extended and airy. Nothing stands out as offensive - no sibilance, just a very balanced signature. Plays everything I throw at it well. It's a full BA set but it is well vented - I usually have trouble with full BA sets and had no issue with the Cantor. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Audionotions

2025-09-09
Audionotions 8.5 Reviewer Score
My favorite take on the JM1 meta so far. Bass tuning is well done with adequate weight and punch - it's not standout but it will do the job. Silky smoooooth and rich mids with very good clarity. Treble that leans slightly bright but is never sharp. Very good transient response, especially with things like plucking sounds and the like. Renders strings very well. Some people might find the treble a bit forward but I don't personally find this to be an issue, except on certain tracks. It's an IEM that is hard to fault and one that will handle anything you throw at it well. Very suitable as a one-and-done IEM. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Aful Cantor reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
S Tech
LOW VOLUME SET. Clean, airy, and highly resolving at its price with endgame separation and detail. Low-end is quick, but lacks impact and a bit of texture. Notes are on the lighter side, not very full, male vocals are a little thin and recessed. Not very dynamic but clean and balanced, but can be borderline clinical. NOT RECOMMENDED past 60dbs or so, gets too shrill and fatiguing in the treble with a slight metallic timbre in the treble depending on the song. Doesn't scale very well and not that immersive, but overall very technical IEM, probably the best tech wise under $1000.

The Aful Cantor presents a complex and frustrating case, offering what might be some of the most detailed and resolving performance under $1,000. The clarity, separation, and sheer resolution are described as "pretty nuts," positioning the Cantor as a potential benchmark for technical ability. It delivers a clean, smooth, light, and airy sound signature with a bass that is very fast, lean, and features a tight sub-bass rumble. At lower volumes, this presentation is highly enjoyable and non-fatiguing, making it exceptionally good for critical, quiet listening sessions where its technical prowess can shine without drawback.

However, this technical marvel comes with a significant and unusual caveat: it is physically fatiguing to the point of causing headaches and a ringing sensation in the temples after only 15-30 minutes of listening at moderate volumes (around 70-80 dB). This is not a fit or nozzle issue, but rather an inherent property of the IEM itself. The problem manifests as a shrill and overly intense quality in the treble at higher volumes, accompanied by a metallic timbre on tracks with lots of cymbals, making it unsuitable for energetic genres like K-pop, J-pop, or EDM. This shrillness is not fully solved by EQ and is believed to be related to the driver design, nozzle, or venting rather than just the tuning.

When compared to peers, the Cantor is more resolving than the warmer, fuller, and smoother Letshuoer Supernova but falls short of its natural timbre. It also can't match the Monarch MK3 as an all-rounder, which offers a more impactful bass, better vocals, and a smoother, more engaging experience. The Cantor's vocals are also a weak point, being recessed, light, and borderline thin. The final recommendation is to definitely demo these first; they are only easy to recommend for those who listen at very low volumes (under 60 dB) and are not sensitive to treble intensity, as its scaling at normal listening levels is poor.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Jays Audio

2025-08-28
Jays Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S- Tech
Balanced, clean, airy, with a slight treble emphasis, good EST implementation, great overall package and accesories at the price. Similar to TOP PRO but with ESTs and not as vocal centric. Easy rec if you want something balanced and airy.

The NiceHCK Rockies have a balanced tuning with standout treble extension from its ESTs. Vocals are tamer with a cut in the upper mids, trading sparkle-forward presence for a smoother, airier presentation; staging feels more open because bass and vocals sit slightly back, while cymbal decay lingers with a pleasing airiness. Technical performance is very good for the price—punching above many $500–$600 peers—and the unboxing/accessories package adds to the overall value.

Low end is grounded and tidy rather than slammy; texture and separation are solid, but this isn’t for bassheads or those wanting vocal-forward excitement (sets like Top Pro or Volare cover that better). The Rockies excel with rock/metal/indie/classical where the extra air, layering, and controlled upper energy shine; they scale best at mid volumes, and tip rolling should avoid options that over-boost or dull the treble—the stock tips already hit a sweet spot. Net: a confident recommendation at ~$500–$600 for listeners prioritizing treble quality, detail, and spaciousness, with the main trade-off being a more restrained bass and laid-back vocal emphasis.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Aful Cantor reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score normalized
It's super impressive but also really difficult to edge on comfort. It's not my favorite sound but good sounding. Competing well at it's price point

The AFUL Cantor lands as a flagship all-BA set with 14 balanced armatures at $800, packaged with a great-handling nylon cable and a handsome shell. The catch is fit: a very long nozzle with a metal insert demands a deep insertion, and comfort varies widely; AFUL’s stock tips are essentially required to keep that nozzle from poking and to restore some flex. Build and presentation impress, but the ear-fit can be fussy and the shells tend to stick out.

Tuning trends U-shaped: a lower-mid dip into a hefty sub-bass boost, relaxed upper mids, and noticeable upper-treble energy. When seated correctly, the set delivers crisp transients with a touch of “planar-like” pluck, good imaging, and clean BA bass that favors electronic thump over kick-drum slam; with the wrong tip or depth it swings to brittle/bright or muted. The midrange can read a bit thin, so the contrast comes more from bass/treble edges than from vocal saturation.

Compared with Symphonium Helios, both are all-BA and graph-adjacent, but Helios leans vocal-forward and smooth while Cantor is the more contrasty, fun listen that trades mid presence for excitement. Net: technically capable and competitive when dialed in, yet compromised by comfort and tip dependence. Final verdict: 3/5 stars—a better match for listeners with deep pockets and deep ears.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Super* Review

2025-09-13
Super* Review 6* * score normalized
The NiceHCK Rockies is a $500 tribrid (1DD+2BA+2EST) tuned almost identically to the Mega 5 EST but with slightly less bass and a touch more lower treble, yielding tighter bass and clearer separation at the cost of a drier, slightly brittle tone; build is solid, though the stiff, slider-less cable and average fit detract. Overall it’s good, but the warmer Mega 5 EST is preferred, and the Rockies lands at 3/5.

NiceHCK Rockies lands as a $500 tribrid (1DD+2BA+2EST) that mirrors the Mega5-EST’s tuning with subtle tweaks. The unboxing is generous—three styles of tips (including AET07-style and tacky “medical” silicone), a large puck case, and a swappable 3.5/4.4 screw-lock plug. Build feels premium with a real pietersite stone faceplate; fit is comfortable but shell geometry is generic, so stability depends on tips. The stock cable looks nice but is stiff and, notably, has no chin slider.

Sonically, Rockies follows a tilted diffuse-field / “new meta” balance with slightly less bass and a touch more lower-treble than Mega5-EST—on the order of ~1 dB each way. That shift tightens the low end and improves separation/imaging, making the set feel more technical; however, it also trims warmth and depth, leaving the presentation a bit dry/brittle at times. Bass quality is clean and controlled rather than showy; treble reads clear without obvious harshness on the 711 rig readout, though it can edge lean.

Against peers, Mega5-EST stays the easier, warmer listen with slightly “thuddier” bass, while DUNU’s Brain Dance is the pick for maximum excitement and staging (more clinical up top). Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk (analog use) offers stronger imaging and notably satisfying bass execution at a lower price. Rockies ends up a very good, balanced all-rounder that some will prefer over Mega5-EST for its tidier bass and clarity, but the trade for brightness and dryness is real—final verdict: 3/5.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Aful Cantor (more reviews)

Aful Cantor reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score normalized

This is AFUL’s flagship science project: the Cantor packs 14 BAs per side (28 total) and a heap of buzzword tech—Dual-Channel Acoustic Maze for sub-bass, non-destructive direct-drive topology, and multi-dimensional crossover trickery that reads like Star Trek schematics. The housing even extends a stainless-steel nozzle to the tip’s end to bypass tip coloration—smart for consistency, dicey for ears with wide-bore silicones. Stick to the stock silicones or better yet foams to calm treble and avoid any scrape-risk.

Sonically it’s a hyper-resolving analyzer: every band is so present that volume tends to go down, not up, and mediocre recordings get roasted on the spot. Imaging is precise but a bit less cohesive than simpler sets; stage stays as the track dictates, while separation feels like a mixing desk with 14 faders. The sub-bass dives shockingly deep for an all-BA—think whisper-low “whoomp”—yet it isn’t a bass-monster; overall balance leans revealing rather than lush.

Pairing matters: clinical amps make it razor-edged, while warmer sources (R2R, iFi, RME-ish) and foam tips smooth it into addictive detail. At $800 it isn’t the one IEM to rule them all; it’s the specialist tool for listeners who want to dissect space, mic technique, and mix decisions—more control room than mosh pit. Cable and case are solid (4.4 mm balanced), and a tuning switch would have been nice, but for the right kind of nerd this thing lets you become the squig.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Aful Cantor reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 8.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Comment: A massive improvement over the prototype at canjam, a killer set for techs under US$1000, nothing else really comes close. Finally a true u12t competitor with better fit, cable, and accessories at a lower price. Crystal clear across all frequencies, extremely revealing set that slices apart the layers in the music; treble so nuanced yet pleasant that you cannot believe an all BA set is doing this Less midbass presence, overall tonality can come across as a little too lean especially with treble focus

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: S- Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S-

Aful Cantor reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S Tech
One of the most resolving IEMs. It reveals details you’ve never noticed before. Exceptional detail, neutral tuning, and great bass quality. Very revealing. Could use more bass for my taste.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Nicehck Rockies (more reviews)

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Fox Told Me So

2025-09-26
Fox Told Me So 8.6 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S- Tech
NiceHCK Rockies is a tribrid (1DD + 2BA + 2EST) that rides the “golden formula” with a twist: output impedance matters—a lot. Driven from low-impedance sources, it delivers its intended tuning; from laptops or interfaces with higher Z-out, bass balloons uncontrollably. All after all, its' impedance curve isn’t flat, with higher impedance in the low frequencies. This means that if your source has a high output impedance, the bass will draw more power than other frequencies.

Tonally, Rockies follows JM1’s safe neutral-ish slope but with leaner mids and brighter treble. Bass is punchy, quick, and well-controlled; mids a touch dark but cleanly separated; and treble opens into airy, effortless EST sparkle with no sharp edges. Stage has decent depth over width, resolution solid for the price, immersive enough without grandeur.

Verdict: not flawless (could use more sub-bass reach, meatier bass, thicker mids, and wider stage), but well-executed overall. A satisfying, balanced tribrid that showcases EST treble gracefully without breaking the bank.

NiceHCK’s new flagship Rockies is a tribrid tuned for modern detail: 1DD+2BA+2EST under $500, clearly squaring up to Hisenior’s Mega5. The build pairs a black resin shell with a real-stone Pietersite faceplate—distinctive without feeling flashy. The headline quirk: extreme sensitivity to source output impedance. With higher-OI sources (laptop/24Ω interfaces) the bass explodes into a clubby boom; with a low-OI dongle (e.g., <2Ω like FiiO KA13) the tuning snaps into place—tighter lows and balanced overall. Measured on a B&K 5128, the Rockies’ “properly driven” curve mirrors the original JM1 through upper mids and treble, then adds a narrow 14kHz lift for extra air and sparkle.

Once driven correctly, bass turns punchy, clean, and disciplined—impactful without bleed, earning a confident 4.5/5. Vocals image with razor-edged precision and a slightly darker hue, yet remain well-separated; treble flows smoothly with EST-powered extension, no harshness or sibilance, and even opens further after some burn-in. Resolution and depth layering impress more than width—the horizontal soundstage sits about average for the price. Wish-list tweaks would be a touch deeper sub-bass, a hair brighter mids, and a wider lateral spread. Overall, Rockies feels like a thoughtfully executed, source-dependent tribrid that rewards a low-impedance chain with a balanced, detailed, and satisfyingly airy presentation.


Fox Told Me So original ranking

Fox Told Me So Youtube Channel

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Tim Tuned

2025-07-16
Tim Tuned 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
The Mega5EST but a slight bit more technical and bright

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: S Mids: S Treble: A+

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by IEMRanking AI

2025-07-19
IEMRanking AI 7.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech

The NiceHCK Rockies is a five-driver tribrid using 1DD + 2 Knowles BA + 2 Sonion EST in a resin shell with Pietersite stone faceplates. Specs list a detachable 0.78 mm 2-pin cable with swappable 3.5/4.4 mm plug, 9.8 Ω impedance and 121 dB/Vrms sensitivity, indicating easy driveability from portable sources.

Early third-party coverage characterizes the tuning as neutral with a sub-bass lift and smooth, controlled treble, with 5128 measurements available via Crinacle’s public database and a review on Hangout’s channel. These impressions emphasize strong imaging and detail without obvious harshness when recordings are clean.

At an MSRP of $499 (with a short launch price of $469), value hinges on preference for an energetic, U/neutral-with-bass presentation; listeners sensitive to upper energy may find mids a touch lean on certain material, as some impressions note. In short, Rockies trades a warm mid focus for sub-bass reach, treble resolution, and a stable stage that suits modern pop, electronic, and large-scale orchestral.


Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A Dynamics: A Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: A

Aful Cantor User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 2 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

Nicehck Rockies User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 2 user reviews

9

Outstanding

Aful Cantor Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8

Gaming Grade

A+

Nicehck Rockies Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.4

Gaming Grade

A+

Aful Cantor Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

S-
  • Excellent clarity and detail. Precise imaging and expansive soundstage. Manages complex passages with minimal smearing and good transient speed.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble S-
Superb treble: effortless extension with crystal clarity. Perfect balance of sparkle and smoothness with exceptional detail.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Details S
Reference-class detail: microscopic resolution with perfect texture reproduction. Nothing is lost, revealing the absolute truth of the recording.
Imaging S-
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision. Creates a palpable sense of physical placement with perfect positional stability.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Premium pricing warrants consideration of gaming-first alternatives for lower cost

Nicehck Rockies Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Highly polished technical execution. Excellent frequency synergy creates an immersive experience. Enhances musical content.

Average Technical Grade

S-
  • Excellent clarity and detail. Precise imaging and expansive soundstage. Manages complex passages with minimal smearing and good transient speed.
Bass S-
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids S-
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A+
Superb treble: effortless extension with crystal clarity. Perfect balance of sparkle and smoothness with exceptional detail.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Details A
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Good value for serious gaming performance.

Aful Cantor User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Nexus
9

Excellent overall clarity and imaging, though fit demands can be a deal-breaker

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: S Dynamics: S- Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S
Pros
Tonally balanced signature with superb detail retrieval
Cons
Requires deep insertion and has a large shell that may challenge fit for some
Aeris
8

Well-rounded flagship IEM with refined tuning and tech for the money.

Tuning: A+ Tech: S- Bass: A Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S-
Pros
Exceptional clarity and tonal balance that punches above its price bracket.
Cons
Requires precise tip fit for best performance and subtle treble can be fatiguing at high volumes.

Nicehck Rockies User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
WTW3
9.5

A lively rendition of the diffuse field tuning that tilts slightly upward for additional clarity. Tastefully bass-boosted DD, clear and clean BA mids with slightly recessed vocals, and standout EST treble presence make an engaging JM-1 all-rounder.

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: S Mids: S Treble: S+ Dynamics: S- Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S
Pros
Lively, unique take on neutral with bass boost. Excellent detail.
Cons
An ever so slight increase in bass shelf could provide more dynamicism.
Zale
8.4

Lively tribrid with engaging low end and airy detail that still sounds cohesive. Strong technical performance for the price without losing musicality.

Tuning: A+ Tech: S- Bass: S- Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: S- Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S-
Pros
Punchy, fast bass with good texture and sub-bass reach. Smooth-leaning EST treble with high detail and precise imaging; comfortable fit and solid isolation.
Cons
V-shaped balance leaves mids a bit recessed. Treble can lean bright on poor recordings.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer