Aful Cantor VS ZiiGaat Luna

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Aful Cantor and ZiiGaat Luna use 14BA and 6BA driver setups respectively. Aful Cantor costs $800 while ZiiGaat Luna costs $379. Aful Cantor is $421 more expensive. ZiiGaat Luna holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.7 vs 7.8). User ratings place Aful Cantor at 8.5 and ZiiGaat Luna at 8.2. Aful Cantor has significantly better bass with a 1.5-point edge, ZiiGaat Luna has better mids with a 0.6-point edge, Aful Cantor has significantly better treble with a 1.3-point edge, ZiiGaat Luna has better dynamics with a 0.8-point edge, Aful Cantor has significantly better soundstage with a 1.1-point edge and Aful Cantor has significantly better details with a 1.7-point edge.

Insights

Metric Aful Cantor ZiiGaat Luna
Bass 8 6.5
Mids 7.3 7.9
Treble 8.8 7.5
Details 9 7.3
Soundstage 8.3 7.2
Imaging 8.5 7.8
Dynamics 6 6.8
Tonality 8 8
Technicalities 9.1 7.9

Aful Cantor Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.7

Strongly Favorable


ZiiGaat Luna Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.8

Strongly Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Aful Cantor reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

This is AFUL’s flagship science project: the Cantor packs 14 BAs per side (28 total) and a heap of buzzword tech—Dual-Channel Acoustic Maze for sub-bass, non-destructive direct-drive topology, and multi-dimensional crossover trickery that reads like Star Trek schematics. The housing even extends a stainless-steel nozzle to the tip’s end to bypass tip coloration—smart for consistency, dicey for ears with wide-bore silicones. Stick to the stock silicones or better yet foams to calm treble and avoid any scrape-risk.

Sonically it’s a hyper-resolving analyzer: every band is so present that volume tends to go down, not up, and mediocre recordings get roasted on the spot. Imaging is precise but a bit less cohesive than simpler sets; stage stays as the track dictates, while separation feels like a mixing desk with 14 faders. The sub-bass dives shockingly deep for an all-BA—think whisper-low “whoomp”—yet it isn’t a bass-monster; overall balance leans revealing rather than lush.

Pairing matters: clinical amps make it razor-edged, while warmer sources (R2R, iFi, RME-ish) and foam tips smooth it into addictive detail. At $800 it isn’t the one IEM to rule them all; it’s the specialist tool for listeners who want to dissect space, mic technique, and mix decisions—more control room than mosh pit. Cable and case are solid (4.4 mm balanced), and a tuning switch would have been nice, but for the right kind of nerd this thing lets you become the squig.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Aful Cantor or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $687

Buy Aful Cantor on HiFiGO

ZiiGaat Luna reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.5 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

The ZiiGaat Luna is an all-BA IEM that completely shatters expectations. Designed for studio engineers and stage performers, it delivers a tonally balanced, accurate, and precision-focused sound that somehow avoids being boring. It provides excellent staging, separation, clarity, and imaging, resulting in an incredibly engaging listening experience that is both enjoyable and truthful to the source material.

Priced at $380, these are absolutely worth more than they cost, with a perceived value easily hitting the $500 mark. They are a shining example of a professional monitor that doesn't put you to sleep, making them a rare find. The build is typical ZiiGaat—lightweight polymer with a surprisingly pretty sparkly purple and green shell—though it comes with the brand's typically oversized packaging and standard cable.

For anyone seeking a flat, uncolored reference sound, the Luna is a top-tier contender. They are tip-agnostic and need no fixing out of the box, performing superbly with aftermarket tips. This is one of the few professional-focused monitors that earns max respect for delivering on its promise without sacrificing musicality.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your ZiiGaat Luna or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $379

Buy ZiiGaat Luna on Linsoul

Aful Cantor reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S Tech
Maybe best detailed set, fit is extremely difficult.
Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Cantor delivers a balanced and neutral sound signature, praised for its exceptional upper air, treble extension, and pristine clarity. While the bass offers sufficient dynamics without being thunderous, and female vocals sound natural, some listeners might desire a touch more punch in the upper mids (around 2-3kHz) and find a slight peak in the 4-6kHz region occasionally noticeable. The premium build quality stands out, featuring a unique and stunning "star night" face plate, a thick but comfortable shell with a slender nozzle, and excellent accessories. These include a slightly microphonic but otherwise nice-looking flat two-pin cable and an exceptionally plush case typically found on far more expensive IEMs.

Graph comparisons reveal the Cantor's tuning shares similarities with models like the Moondrop Blessing 2: Dusk and the AFUL Explorer, but it distinguishes itself with superior detail retrieval and dynamics. It competes impressively against significantly pricier offerings like the Elysian Annihilator in technical performance, offering a smoother presentation with slightly less sub-bass focus. The overall sonic presentation is described as sophisticated, refined, and highly engaging, creating a sense of music surrounding the listener. Minor tuning preferences aside – wishing for a bit more upper mid presence and slightly less energy around 4-6kHz and 8kHz – the core sound quality is highly regarded.

Representing strong sonic value despite its price point, the Cantor earns a high ranking for its unique and beautiful design, premium feel, and exceptional technical performance. While acknowledging excellent cheaper options like the AFUL Explorer exist, the Cantor justifies its cost with its detailed, airy presentation and overall package. It's highly recommended for those seeking a neutral, high-performing IEM, though a demo is advised given the investment. Ultimately, the AFUL Cantor is considered a treasure, fulfilling over a year of anticipation with its beautiful aesthetics and uniquely engaging sound.

Mids: A- Treble: S Dynamics: B Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

ZiiGaat Luna reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Great Midrange, Sense of realism that is very nice.
Youtube Video Summary

The ZiiGaat Luna impresses immediately with its solid build quality, featuring a comfortable metal nozzle shell and a unique wing design for a secure fit. While the shell doesn't reinvent ZiiGaat's typical mold, the accessories show significant improvement, including a nice selection of tips, a practical case, and a simple but effective cable with swappable terminations (including 4.4mm). This attention to the unboxing experience, especially at its $379 price point, demonstrates ZiiGaat listened to community feedback.

Sonically, the Luna delivers a bold, clean, and tactile V-shaped signature with exceptional micro-detail and a fantastic overall frequency response. It stands out as a supremely capable all-rounder, offering a touch of hi-fi quality. Comparisons reveal it surpasses other ZiiGaat models like the specialist Arcanis, the neutral Lush, and provides a clear upgrade path over the Odyssey. While the Mangird Top Pro offers thick, majestic bass, the Luna boasts better clarity and detail and is deemed a more versatile choice. It also compares favorably to benchmarks like the Aful Performer 7, offering better treble and a cleaner presentation, and edges out the 7th Acoustics Supernova with a slightly more agreeable tuning.

Ultimately, the Luna hits a remarkable sweet spot. It combines a balanced sound with great technicalities, improved accessories, and a tonality that avoids harshness while retaining excitement. For its price bracket, it represents a fantastic value and emerges as a strong contender for the benchmark all-rounder in the $300-$400 range, offering a taste of high-end performance without the ludicrous cost. It’s a clear sign of ZiiGaat refining their approach based on user input, resulting in one of their finest IEMs to date.

Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Aful Cantor reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S Tech
One of the most resolving IEMs. It reveals details you’ve never noticed before. Exceptional detail, neutral tuning, and great bass quality. Very revealing. Could use more bass for my taste.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

ZiiGaat Luna reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
Chill, relaxed, and detailed all-rounder. Smooth, warm, and balanced with forward vocals and airy treble. Relaxed but still engaging. BA Bass. Upper treble might be too much for some.
Youtube Video Summary

The Ziigaat Luna arrives as a $379 all-balance armature IEM, impressing right out of the box with its premium accessories. You get a large, sturdy zipper case (though not pocket-friendly), three pairs of narrow bore silicone tips, a set of clear silicone tips, foam tips, and a standout modular cable with both 3.5mm and 4.4mm terminations. The cable itself is praised for being tangle-free, flexible, and microphonic-free, featuring a metal y-split and solid modular connections. The Luna sports a resin build with attractive faceplates and an average size shell, offering a comfortable fit familiar to other Ziigaat models, though some might experience pressure using narrow bore tips for a deep fit.

Sonically, the Luna delivers a smooth, slightly warm, and airy signature that's notably non-fatiguing. The bass, while lacking the physical slam of a dynamic driver, is one of the better BA implementations, offering satisfying mid-bass thump, definition, and gentle rumble. The mid-range has a touch of warmth adding body and naturalness, with proper note weight and slightly relaxed yet clear vocals that work well across rock, metal, hip-hop, and more. The treble is sparkly and airy with good micro-detail, thanks to an upper air boost, though this could be noticeable for sensitive listeners. Technically, it lands around 80% between the TruthEar Nova and Dunu SA6 Ultra, with excellent imaging precision, above-average soundstage, and nice layering.

Comparisons reveal the Luna shares a similar tonality to the discontinued, more expensive Dunu SA6 Ultra, making it a great alternative. It bests other Ziigaat models like the Arcanis and Odyssey in overall balance, detail, and air, though the Odyssey offers more bass physicality. Against strong competitors like the Kiwi Ears Astral or Xenns Mangird Top Pro, the Luna holds its own with a warmer, fuller, and more relaxing presentation, even if it concedes in ultimate refinement or bass impact. It earns a solid 4 out of 5 stars for its unique, competitive tuning and fantastic value, highly recommended for those seeking a detailed yet relaxing all-rounder with smooth vocals and airy sparkle. However, bassheads, those sensitive to upper treble, or seekers of neutral/reference tuning should look elsewhere.


Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Aful Cantor reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
S Tech
LOW VOLUME SET. Clean, airy, and highly resolving at its price with endgame separation and detail. Low-end is quick, but lacks impact and a bit of texture. Notes are on the lighter side, not very full, male vocals are a little thin and recessed. Not very dynamic but clean and balanced, but can be borderline clinical. NOT RECOMMENDED past 60dbs or so, gets too shrill and fatiguing in the treble with a slight metallic timbre in the treble depending on the song. Doesn't scale very well and not that immersive, but overall very technical IEM, probably the best tech wise under $1000.
Youtube Video Summary

The Aful Cantor presents a complex and frustrating case, offering what might be some of the most detailed and resolving performance under $1,000. The clarity, separation, and sheer resolution are described as "pretty nuts," positioning the Cantor as a potential benchmark for technical ability. It delivers a clean, smooth, light, and airy sound signature with a bass that is very fast, lean, and features a tight sub-bass rumble. At lower volumes, this presentation is highly enjoyable and non-fatiguing, making it exceptionally good for critical, quiet listening sessions where its technical prowess can shine without drawback.

However, this technical marvel comes with a significant and unusual caveat: it is physically fatiguing to the point of causing headaches and a ringing sensation in the temples after only 15-30 minutes of listening at moderate volumes (around 70-80 dB). This is not a fit or nozzle issue, but rather an inherent property of the IEM itself. The problem manifests as a shrill and overly intense quality in the treble at higher volumes, accompanied by a metallic timbre on tracks with lots of cymbals, making it unsuitable for energetic genres like K-pop, J-pop, or EDM. This shrillness is not fully solved by EQ and is believed to be related to the driver design, nozzle, or venting rather than just the tuning.

When compared to peers, the Cantor is more resolving than the warmer, fuller, and smoother Letshuoer Supernova but falls short of its natural timbre. It also can't match the Monarch MK3 as an all-rounder, which offers a more impactful bass, better vocals, and a smoother, more engaging experience. The Cantor's vocals are also a weak point, being recessed, light, and borderline thin. The final recommendation is to definitely demo these first; they are only easy to recommend for those who listen at very low volumes (under 60 dB) and are not sensitive to treble intensity, as its scaling at normal listening levels is poor.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

ZiiGaat Luna reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech
Airy, smooth, warm, laid-back, balanced, lush and dreamy vibes. Great for rock/metal, scales decently high. Mid-bass over sub. Not as vocal forward as Arcanis and other vocal sets. My Luna graphs very different than HBB's - wait for more reviews.
Youtube Video Summary

The ZiiGaat Luna delivers a smooth, full, and slightly warm sound with exceptional airiness, creating a lush and laid-back listening experience. Vocals are presented in a balanced yet warmer, thicker tonality, pulling back slightly in the mix compared to vocal-centric sets like the Arcanis. This tuning emphasizes micro-nuances in the treble, offering well-extended symbol crashes and a refined, non-fatiguing character. Tonally, it sits as a more technical evolution of the discontinued P1 Max and a warmer, more affordable alternative to the elusive Seven Acoustics Supernova or Dunu SA6 series, delivering a similar smoothness and air at roughly $200 less.

Technically, the Luna performs competitively around the Arcanus level, featuring good resolution, layering, and solid bass texture, though it isn't a sheer technical monster. Its unique, musical tonality more than justifies its $350-$379 price. The bass, powered by Sonion drivers, provides quick separation and snappy response with enough warmth for a comfy, nostalgic feel, though it lacks the deep sub-bass rumble and intense slam of dedicated bass sets like the Ziigaat Cincotres or Estrella. This makes the Luna ideal for rock, indie, and metal genres, where its firm mid-bass, full-bodied yet quick decay, pulled-back vocals (preventing shoutiness), and airy treble excel. It scales well at medium volumes (around 75-80 dB), working as an all-rounder but truly shining with bands.

Compared to its sibling, the Odyssey, the Luna is smoother, more laid-back, and airier versus the Odyssey's sharper transients and greater energy. Against the Xenns Top Pro, the Luna offers a warmer, fuller, airier sound but yields in ultimate clarity, vocal forwardness, and transient sharpness. The Kiwi Ears Astral provides a more vibrant, sub-bass focused, and dynamic all-rounder at a lower price, but the Luna counters with superior smoothness, refinement, and a more unique, immersive signature. While vocal-focused sets like the Studio 4 or Volume S offer greater vocal clarity and power, the Luna provides slightly better overall detail retrieval and its distinctive warm, airy musicality. In conclusion, the Luna stands out as a highly competitive set with a unique tuning not commonly found near its price, backed by a quality interchangeable cable, making it a compelling recommendation for those seeking its specific refined, lush, and airy character.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Aful Cantor reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.4 * score rescaled + normalized
15 community members have rated the AFUL Cantor at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

ZiiGaat Luna reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8 * score rescaled + normalized
12 community members have rated the ZiiGaat Luna at an average of 4.6/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Aful Cantor (more reviews)

Aful Cantor reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 8.4 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S+ Tech
Rating: S | Value: ⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮🎮 | Comfort: 8 insane technicality, totl treble bit bright. bass could be more dynamic
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Cantor is a 14-BA, ~$800 set that looks premium and shows off its acoustic maze tubing through a semi-transparent shell, with faceplates in Star Knight or Marine Echo. The fit can be tricky: a long metal nozzle wants a deep insertion, and short tips won’t seal; longer tips like SoftEars Ultra Clear or Dunu S&S keep the nozzle covered and the tonality stable. The stock nylon cable feels nice but is very microphonic, making a swap advisable. Measurement quirks from shallow insertion are misleading—proper deep fit removes the apparent treble spike and reflects what’s actually heard.

Tuning follows the AFUL house sound: a mild U-shape, fairly neutral with a brightish tilt. The maze tech gives BA bass surprising decay and texture, with neutral mid-bass and a touch more sub-bass focus—close to a DD feel, if not identical. Mids sit clean; female vocals sound natural and sweetened by the steady rise through the upper-mids, while a gentle ~300 Hz dip makes male vocals and lower-octave instruments a bit lean. Treble is smooth yet energetic, with standout extension (impressively achieved without ESTs); it hovers near the upper tolerance for brightness but remains controlled with the right tips.

Technical performance is where Cantor shines: top-tier resolution, precise imaging, and a notably wide soundstage—great for detail retrieval and gaming, where positional cues pop (think footstep clarity in FPS titles). Versus Performer 7, Cantor trades P7’s fuller low-mids and better male vocals for cleaner female vocals and a more even treble. Against 64 Audio U12t, Cantor’s bass quality impresses, its mids differ (U12t’s 3 kHz dip adds sweetness but can feel odd), and Cantor’s treble sounds smoother; both resolve at a very high level, with Cantor edging imaging and stage width. Overall: an excellent but not universal pick—cable microphonics, deep-fit demands, and slightly thin lower mids mean careful matching to preferences. For detail lovers with female-vocal libraries who tolerate a brighter treble, it earns a one-star recommendation; others may prefer alternatives in this bracket.


Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Aful Cantor reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 8.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Comment: A massive improvement over the prototype at canjam, a killer set for techs under US$1000, nothing else really comes close. Finally a true u12t competitor with better fit, cable, and accessories at a lower price. Crystal clear across all frequencies, extremely revealing set that slices apart the layers in the music; treble so nuanced yet pleasant that you cannot believe an all BA set is doing this Less midbass presence, overall tonality can come across as a little too lean especially with treble focus

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: S- Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S-

Aful Cantor reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8 Reviewer Score
Very well balanced with very good details and separation. Bass is punchy and fast, mids are clean with excellent instrument separation, treble is well extended and airy. Nothing stands out as offensive - no sibilance, just a very balanced signature. Plays everything I throw at it well. It's a full BA set but it is well vented - I usually have trouble with full BA sets and had no issue with the Cantor.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Aful Cantor reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 6 * score rescaled + normalized
Achieves levels of soundstaging and detail resolution that compete with $2000 IEMs, truly top of the line acousitc performance. IF AND ONLY IF, you can achieve a deep enough fit in your ears. Metal nozzle extension can cause irritation or cuts. Stock cable is super microphonic
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL’s $800 flagship pushes hard on engineering: 14 balanced armatures, a five-way network, 3D-printed shells, and the brand’s acoustic maze that coaxes unusually textured, dynamic-driver-like bass out of an all-BA setup. Packaging is “classic AFUL”—nice case, multiple tip sets, cleaning brush—but light for the price, and the cloth-sheathed cable, while beautifully machined and very low resistance, is highly microphonic. The big talking point is the metal nozzle extension: tips must be pushed down to the rim for a deep fit, which optimizes tonality and treble smoothness. Comfort varies wildly by ear; some report irritation, and the long nozzle feels fragile if dropped.

Sonically, this is AFUL’s house sound elevated: a slightly warm-neutral balance with clean, meaty lows, natural mids, and an upper-mid/treble that sits right on the edge—silky and detailed with a deep fit, but bright and fatiguing if worn shallow or with the wrong tips. It is extremely revealing of mastering quality, rewarding good recordings with elite microdetail, imaging, and a huge, tall stage that can hang with far pricier sets. A mild impedance adapter (or higher-Z source) can warm the tone and shave some air, though at a small cost to sparkle and openness.

Against AFUL’s own lineup, the closest kin is the Performer 7: similar flavor, less resolution and scale, but a far better value. Cantor is the brand’s “thesis statement”—the most complete execution of its tuning—with true summit-fi technicals at a mid-summit price. Still, it carries caveats: fit sensitivity, that microphonic cable, and accessory stinginess. Recommended only if the budget is comfortable, a deep, stable fit is achievable and comfortable for long sessions, and AFUL’s warm-neutral house sound already hits the spot; for everyone else, the P7 or Explorer make safer picks.


Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Aful Cantor reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized
It's super impressive but also really difficult to edge on comfort. It's not my favorite sound but good sounding. Competing well at it's price point
Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Cantor lands as a flagship all-BA set with 14 balanced armatures at $800, packaged with a great-handling nylon cable and a handsome shell. The catch is fit: a very long nozzle with a metal insert demands a deep insertion, and comfort varies widely; AFUL’s stock tips are essentially required to keep that nozzle from poking and to restore some flex. Build and presentation impress, but the ear-fit can be fussy and the shells tend to stick out.

Tuning trends U-shaped: a lower-mid dip into a hefty sub-bass boost, relaxed upper mids, and noticeable upper-treble energy. When seated correctly, the set delivers crisp transients with a touch of “planar-like” pluck, good imaging, and clean BA bass that favors electronic thump over kick-drum slam; with the wrong tip or depth it swings to brittle/bright or muted. The midrange can read a bit thin, so the contrast comes more from bass/treble edges than from vocal saturation.

Compared with Symphonium Helios, both are all-BA and graph-adjacent, but Helios leans vocal-forward and smooth while Cantor is the more contrasty, fun listen that trades mid presence for excitement. Net: technically capable and competitive when dialed in, yet compromised by comfort and tip dependence. Final verdict: 3/5 stars—a better match for listeners with deep pockets and deep ears.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

ZiiGaat Luna (more reviews)

ZiiGaat Luna reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 7.4 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
A Tuning
A- Tech
All-BA take on ZiiGaat's 5/5 tuning: clean, vocal-friendly and coherent, but more side-grade than breakthrough. Treble energy and average stage may benefit from light EQ. Clean, coherent all-BA tuning with fuller vocals and quick, defined bass. Linear mid-treble without a 5 kHz dip can sound intense on rock, and the stage feels flat unless EQ'd.
Youtube Video Summary

ZiiGaat Luna follows a six-BA, five-and-five recipe: about a 5 dB bass shelf with ~5 dB ear gain for a clean, end-to-end presentation. The BA bass is quick and controlled, supporting the mids without bloat; coherence is a clear strength of all-BA designs. Compared with Odyssey, Luna brings a fuller upper-mid region and a stronger vocal focus, suiting listeners who want clarity and body without overboosted low end.

Treble carries energy from ~2 kHz through the upper range; the absence of a 5 kHz dip keeps cymbals and hi-hats crisp but can feel a touch intense on dense rock mixes, especially at higher volumes. Staging is pretty much there, and a small EQ cut (1–2 dB) around the mid-treble can open up space and depth. At $380 this reads as a side-grade within ZiiGaat's current family: very clean, coherent, and mid-centric, ideal if an all-BA flavor of the 5/5 tuning is the goal.

Bass: B+ Mids: A Treble: B+ Dynamics: B+ Soundstage: B Details: A-

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

ZiiGaat Luna reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech

The ZiiGaat Luna delivers a studio-focused sound with its six balanced armature drivers per ear, combining dual Sonion 39AY008 subwoofers, dual Knowles 32873 midrange units, and dual Knowles 33518 tweeters. Its tuning prioritizes accuracy: an 8dB sub-bass shelf below 250Hz provides punch without mid-bass bleed, while a deliberately flat midrange ensures vocals and instruments sound natural and uncolored. The transient speed and precise layering make complex mixes easily parsable, though some users note a slight hollowness in the upper bass/lower mids common to BA bass implementations.

Comfort and build are strengths, featuring lightweight 3D-printed medical-grade resin shells and an ergonomic fit. The included modular cable, with interchangeable 3.5mm and 4.4mm terminations, is practical for various sources. While its analytical presentation excels for critical monitoring and instrument separation, it may lack the dynamic driver heft preferred for genres demanding visceral impact. The $379 price positions it competitively against multi-BA peers, offering studio-grade channel matching and detail retrieval for engineers or audiophiles seeking a neutral reference.


Aful Cantor User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 2 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

ZiiGaat Luna User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8.2

Very Positive

Aful Cantor Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.3

Gaming Grade

A+

ZiiGaat Luna Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.7

Gaming Grade

A

Aful Cantor Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.

Average Technical Grade

S
  • It resolves with authority, pairing lightning-fast transients with holographic staging. Ambient cues wrap around with ease.
Bass A+
Bass performance is excellent, combining depth with rock-solid control. Basslines feel tactile and enveloping.
Mids A-
The mids sound lush and articulate, capturing emotion effortlessly. Strings and keys shimmer with realism.
Treble S-
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics B
Expect energetic dynamics that bring music to life without harshness. It injects enthusiasm into fast music.
Soundstage A+
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Details S
Resolution reaches the limit of perception, exposing layers you didn't know existed. Clarity remains pristine regardless of complexity.
Imaging S-
Movement flows gracefully, tracing arcs that are rendered with surgical accuracy. Movement effects are rendered with precision.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Premium pricing warrants consideration of gaming-first alternatives for lower cost

ZiiGaat Luna Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • The tonal balance is polished and expressive, highlighting emotion without sacrificing accuracy. It keeps emotional weight without sacrificing accuracy.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • You get a well-rounded technical package that keeps separation, detail, and staging in harmony. It's a solid middle ground between fun and fidelity.
Bass B+
Low end hits with respectable impact while staying reasonably tidy. You get a healthy sense of rhythm.
Mids A
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble A
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics B+
Dynamic expression is good, delivering solid impact and convincing contrast. Percussion lands with convincing weight.
Soundstage A-
The stage stretches in every direction, carving out clear three-dimensional pockets for each player. Placement accuracy impresses from the start.
Details A-
Low-level information blossoms, presenting a rich tapestry of articulate sound. Analytical listeners will be delighted.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Aful Cantor User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
A Aeris
8

Well-rounded flagship IEM with refined tuning and tech for the money.

Tuning: A+ Tech: S- Bass: A Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S-
Pros
Exceptional clarity and tonal balance that punches above its price bracket.
Cons
Requires precise tip fit for best performance and subtle treble can be fatiguing at high volumes.
N Nexus
9

Excellent overall clarity and imaging, though fit demands can be a deal-breaker

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: S Dynamics: S- Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S
Pros
Tonally balanced signature with superb detail retrieval
Cons
Requires deep insertion and has a large shell that may challenge fit for some

ZiiGaat Luna User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
T Talix
8.2

A reference-tuned technical marvel for critical listening, offering studio-grade accuracy at its price, though BA limitations persist.

Tuning: S- Tech: A+ Bass: A Mids: S Treble: S- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: A+
Pros
Superb detail retrieval and natural timbre, especially in mids/treble; lightweight resin shells ensure long-wearing comfort.
Cons
BA timbre lacks visceral sub-bass impact; soundstage can flatten in complex tracks, limiting holographic immersion.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer