Aful Performer 5+2 VS AFUL Dawn-X

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Aful Performer 5+2 and AFUL Dawn-X use 2DD+4BA+1Planar and 1DD+8BA+4EST+1BC driver setups respectively. Aful Performer 5+2 costs $229 while AFUL Dawn-X costs $1,299. AFUL Dawn-X is $1,070 more expensive. AFUL Dawn-X holds a decisive 1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.7 vs 8.7). AFUL Dawn-X has better bass with a 0.5-point edge, AFUL Dawn-X has better mids with a 0.5-point edge, AFUL Dawn-X has significantly better treble with a 1.3-point edge, AFUL Dawn-X has better soundstage with a 0.7-point edge and AFUL Dawn-X has better details with a 0.9-point edge.

Insights

Metric Aful Performer 5+2 AFUL Dawn-X
Bass 8 8.5
Mids 8 8.5
Treble 7.6 8.9
Details 7.6 8.5
Soundstage 7.8 8.5
Imaging 7.9 8
Dynamics 7.6 7.5
Tonality 7.8 8.8
Technicalities 7.7 9.2

Aful Performer 5+2 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.7

Strongly Favorable


AFUL Dawn-X Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.7

Excellent


Reviews Comparison

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Naming drama aside (P5+2? just call it Performer 7), this Aful packs a quirky driver party: 2DD for low end, 4 BA split across mids/treble, plus a tiny micro-planar for the highest sparkle, all marshaled by Aful’s neat miniature crossover. The shells are lightweight, comfy and prettier than they need to be; the cable feels “don’t bother swapping” nice, with 3.5 or 4.4 options. The box is loaded with silicone tips but no foam—a miss, because the right seal changes everything. Price target sits around $250, which sets expectations high but not ridiculous.

Stock silicone yields a surgical, respectful tuning with bass that skews neutral and controlled. Swap to well-sealing foam or hybrids and feed a juicy source (warm Class A or tubes) and the set wakes up—stage snaps into a cohesive scene right in front, imaging gets laser-etched, and that micro-planar adds a pinch-of-salt treble spice without turning harsh. It’s an up-close presentation—sometimes almost claustrophobically detailed—in the best way: think “men with trumpets in the head,” precise placement, and excellent extension up top. Not as rowdy as the Explorers; more like a surgeon in a Hawaiian shirt—technical, but with a wink.

Practical upside: the clarity and positioning make this great for gaming and even viable for mixing/mastering checks; just don’t crank it into pain territory. Bass stays tight and responsive, treble sails high, and coherence holds. Tip and source matter a lot: with foam + warm power, it sings; with plain silicone, it’s merely polite. Final tally: a confident 8.5/10—doing a lot right at its price, dinged half a point for making everyone do math on the name.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Aful Performer 5+2 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $213

Buy Aful Performer 5+2 on HiFiGO

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 9 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X goes straight for spectacle: a $1,300 tribrid behemoth with 14 drivers per side—one dynamic, eight BAs, four electrostats, and a bone conductor—that turns familiar tracks into a surreal remix. The presentation is described as “Poltergeist in an IEM,” with spatial effects that feel like a live DSP engine: four imaginary DJs slicing and reassembling the mix on the fly. Every song becomes an event—an Unreal-Engine-in-a-cave vibe—yet it stays coherent enough to be addictive rather than broken, delivering a wildly unique listen that nothing else in the collection replicates.

Forget reading the squiggle: measurements look “normal,” but the sound is anything but. The stage is huge, imaging is hyper-layered, and transient effects pop out and retract with uncanny tactility—great for ASMR, movies, and games where holographic placement sells the illusion. Despite the driver count, it’s not hard to drive; volume needs are moderate, nowhere near planar-pain territory. This is the “break-glass-when-bored” set—the one to pull out after years in the hobby when everything else feels samey and a jolt of abnormal brilliance is required.

Build and accessories match the price: gargantuan shells with stabilized wooden faceplates, a premium cable, a neat leather strap, and a buffet of individually boxed tips, though termination is a simple 3.5 or 4.4 choice. Ergonomics demand some ear real estate, but the payoff is a sound signature that’s gloriously weird and deeply entertaining. Recommendation: not a first or only IEM—save it for collectors who already have “normal” covered and want a statement piece that rewires how music feels.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your AFUL Dawn-X or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,299

Buy AFUL Dawn-X on HiFiGO

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
It's spicy treble is something to watch out for, it's unique.
Youtube Video Summary

Aful Performer 5+2 lands as a hybrid of the beloved Performer 5 and the punchier Explorer. The unboxing is the familiar P5 affair—same case, same style of tips—nothing flashy, but solid. The shell mirrors the P5 in size with a comfy little stabilizing wing that locks in well. No metal nozzle or front filter here, yet tip retention is secure and hassle-free. The flat 2-pin socket is straightforward, and the stock cable feels thick and supple with a reliable chin slider and handy red/blue channel markers. Overall: understated build, great ergonomics, daily-driver ready.

Sonically, this one aims neutral with a very distinct top end—clean, dynamic, incisive. Think switching from black-and-white to color; cymbals and overtones pop with a slightly crunchy/pristine edge that energizes detail without turning harsh on good recordings. Bass isn’t about sheer quantity; it’s about slam and dynamics—quick on the draw, well-controlled, and satisfying when called upon. Vocals sit a notch forward, microdetail is strong, and the overall presentation is coherent, clear, and technical with convincing stage, resolution, and imaging. Not a treble-shy or bass-bombed tuning—more a refined all-rounder for those who want clarity and bite.

Versus the original P5, the 5+2 fixes the missing “air” and soft edges, trading them for crisper transients and better extension. Compared with Explorer (a value champ), the 5+2 brings superior upper-treble reach, detail, and vocal focus. Against Performer 8 and Cantor, it feels more visceral—the P8 is smoother and more relaxed, while Cantor pulls finer microdetail but with less bass slam. Sets like Dino Quattro or J’s Estrella bring bigger fun or treble theatrics, yet the 5+2’s balance and everyday versatility win more often. Net take: a neutral-leaning, highly technical upgrade that stands tall in its bracket—easy to recommend to anyone chasing clarity, speed, and controlled impact over pure warmth or excess bass.

Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 9.6 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
This has a really natural midrange, best BC iem I've heard by far.
Youtube Video Summary

Large, sculpted shells with a bulbous rear (housing the bone conductor) make the Aful Dawn-X a substantial fit—comfortable for some, but risky for small ears. The stock cable feels quality but is 4.4 mm-only, and the case/accessories are tidy; importantly, the nozzle grips tips securely (unlike some past AFUL sets). Overall build is handsome and premium, with fit being the main variable.

Sonically, the tuning favors sub-bass over mid-bass, pairs rich mids with smooth, natural treble that avoids harsh spikes yet has mild 4–6 kHz energy, and presents a cohesive, almost speaker-like soundstage. It wakes up with a bit of volume/power, prioritizing clarity, micro-detail and air over outright slam; the bone conductor subtly supports the midrange more than the lows. At $1,300 it’s competitive for listeners chasing technical refinement and a natural tonality, while value seekers or mid-bass lovers may prefer cheaper AFUL options or sets with more punch.

Mids: S Treble: S Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Overall it is sounding more visceral and incisive than the Performer 5.
Youtube Video Summary

Aful’s Performer 5+2 upgrades the original hybrid with 2DD + 4BA + 1 micro-planar tweeter and lands around $240–$250. The unboxing is practical: three sets of silicone tips, a pocketable puck case, and a soft, nicely draping cable (available in 4.4 or 3.5), though the braid can look a bit loose and the pre-formed hooks run large. The resin shells shift between blue and green under different light; fit is medium-large, very stable, and comfortable once the right tips are found. Note the narrow nozzle without a retaining lip and partially exposed bores/filters—tip grip is key and a little care prevents ear-gunk ingress.

Tonally this leans mild V-shaped: a clean midrange with a confident bass boost, a touch of lower-treble presence for bite, and well-extended air up top. The result is more incisive and punchy than the original P5, with clearer on/off transients that aid separation and layering. Trade-offs show as a hint of gritty/plasticky treble texture on cymbals and brushes—not harsh, but less natural than ideal—while the bass stays tight and exciting.

Against Aful’s Explorer, this sounds brighter, more spacious, and more technical; Explorer plays warmer/denser with smoother treble but less openness. Versus the pricier Thieaudio Oracle MK3, tuning is broadly similar: Oracle is smoother and deeper with a softer attack, while the Performer 5+2 brings more snap and engagement for less money. As a modern mid-tier hybrid, it absolutely still has a place—energetic, spacious, and well-executed—earning a solid four stars.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 7* * score rescaled + normalized
Super Review says AFUL’s Dawn-X is the brand’s best execution of its house sound yet—a $1,300 flagship tribrid with 14 drivers (DD + 8 BA + 4 EST + bone conduction) that fits comfortably and consistently. The tuning is warm and bass-weighted but tight and fast, with precise, slightly assertive treble; staging isn’t very wide but has good front-to-back depth and strong clarity. Versus peers like FiiO FX17, 64 Audio U4s, Dunu Glacier, and Monarch MK4, it favors control and bass quality over maximum width or excitement; he calls it very good but evolutionary and rates it 3/5 stars.
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL’s house sound shows up here in its most polished form: Dawn-X is a tribrid (1DD + 8BA + 4EST + bone conduction) flagship at $1,300 that prioritizes consistent fit and execution over flash. Build is understated with stabilized-wood faceplates, above-average isolation, and a medium/medium-large shell that fits better—and more consistently—than the Cantor. The accessory loadout is solid (four silicone tip sets, large but well-made case), though the stock cable does not have swappable terminations (choose 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm).

Tonally, it’s a balanced, warmer-leaning take on AFUL’s signature: a dense, controlled bass that borders on decadent yet stays quick and clean, slightly relaxed mids, and a precise, mildly forward lower-treble that keeps definition high without tipping into harshness for most listeners. Stage favors front-to-back depth over width; transients are clean and a touch clinical, giving strong separation without sounding smeary. The result is a mature, confident presentation that reads refined rather than showy.

Against peers: versus Cantor, Dawn-X is warmer, smoother, and far more consistent thanks to fit; Cantor can sound brighter and a bit wider. Compared with FiiO FX17, Dawn-X has tighter bass and crisper treble, where FX17 feels looser and fuller. The 64 Audio U4s plays softer and wider; Dawn-X is more precise/clinical. DUNU Glacier hits harder and more V-shaped with smoother treble but less natural acoustic timbre; Dawn-X sounds truer on instruments. Versus ThieAudio Monarch MK4, MK4 is more neutral, vocal-forward with greater width, while Dawn-X offers denser low-end and a calmer demeanor—and a friendlier fit for many ears. Verdict: 3/5 stars—not the flashiest in its bracket, but arguably AFUL’s best execution yet of its signature sound.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 7.8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
Rating: A+ | Value: ⭐⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮 | Comfort: 9 very nice neutral sound recessed female vocals

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 9 Reviewer Score
S+ Tuning
S+ Tech
Rating: S+ | Value: ⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮🎮 | Comfort: 6 natural midrange. ethereal treble. totl techs. rip small ears
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a 12-driver quad-brid flagship (1 DD, 8 BA, 4 EST, 1 bone conduction) priced at $1,300. The unboxing mirrors AFUL’s higher-end sets: big leather case, cable clip, four ear-tip sets, cleaning brush, plus a soft but slightly memory-prone cable available in 3.5 or 4.4—and given the set’s power hunger, 4.4 makes sense. Design skews conservative: a red stabilized-wood faceplate paired with a plain black shell that doesn’t showcase the intricate internals. The shell is also very large (think Monarch-sized), creating comfort issues; small ears will struggle. Tip sensitivity is high, and stock tips provide the most balanced result.

Tonally this is classic AFUL house sound: a mild V with a slightly warm, musical tilt that remains balanced overall. Bass hits with punch, texture, and sub-bass rumble without bloat—ample enough for bass fans yet controlled. The midrange is a standout: natural, lush vocals with male voices gaining a touch from the warmth and female vocals kept more neutral, preserving timbral authenticity and emotional nuance. Treble is rich, smooth, and well-extended; the ESTs are tuned tastefully—no harsh glare—adding just the right air and sparkle. The bone-conduction driver focuses on mids and stays subtle in practice.

Technically, Dawn-X competes with top peers: high resolution, excellent separation, and rare cohesion for a multi-driver design. Imaging and layering feel strikingly realistic, while stage favors depth over width (wider sets like Fatfreq Quantum still outspread it). As a recommendation, it suits listeners seeking a slightly warm, highly detailed, all-rounder; it’s not ideal for small ears, lean-bass preferences, or those wanting brighter upper-mids/treble. Despite strong diminishing returns above mid-fi prices, Dawn-X punches above its tag and earns a rare two-star recommendation from Kois Archive—a flagship that feels genuinely special if the fit works.


Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 7.5 Reviewer Score
Slightly warm leaning balanced signature - Very engaging, decent clarity. Slight metallic/digital sheen but it's not too bad.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 9 Reviewer Score
Slightly warm tilted neutral. Very well balanced with a tasteful bass boost. Bass is surprisingly very weighty and textured with quick decay so bass notes don't linger and overstay their welcome. Lush sounding with very good vocals. Typical AFUL pinna gain region which, as expected, results in very pleasant female vocals that aren't in your face and aren't shouty. Treble is very well extended with a good amount of shimmer and air but at the same time it never gets sibilant. In fact, I'd say treble is silky smooth. Imaging is crisp and realistic with fantastic instrument separation. The stage is enveloping, with good depth and width but it's not excessively large - overall it sounds very natural, with distinctly noticeable layering. Very good technicalities. This is the peak of the AFUL house sound and to date the most natural sounding flagship IEM I've heard. Where a lot of $1k+ IEMs rely on gimmicky tuning to make them sound more impressive, which comes at the cost of sacrificing timbre - the Dawn X sounds natural throughout the frequency response. Build quality is great - the stabilized wood shells are nice. Unfortunately the overall look of the IEM is contentious - the red color doesn't pop much and the AFUL branding on the earpieces is objectively a detractor - if they put Dawn-X on the earpieces, I suspect AFUL would see a huge lift in sales. Nonetheless, these are the best sounding IEMs I've tried to date.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech
A detailed, engaging all-rounder that's exciting without being shouty or harsh. Smooth, neutral tuning with a bass boost, excellent bass quality, clean mids, forward vocals, and sparkly, incisive treble. Great detail. I wouldn’t change a thing.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S+ Tech
Balanced all-rounder with fun bass, lifelike mids, very smooth and refined treble, highly resolving and immersive, with great soundstage and precise imaging. Textured, punchy bass, natural mids, ethereal female vocals, smooth, airy, and non-fatiguing treble, top-tier resolution.
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a premium, resin-shelled flagship with a striking red-wood faceplate, a soft 4.4 mm cable, a protective zipper case, and multiple silicone tips. The shells run large but are well-contoured and vented, offering excellent comfort for extended sessions; those with smaller ears should demo first. Build and accessories are solid overall, with only some cable memory above the chin slider worth noting.

Tuning follows a mild V-shape: a moderate, textured bass lift; natural mids with lifelike vocal timbre; and a smooth, extended treble that brings air and detail without harshness. Kicks have weight and EDM carries rumble, yet vocals remain clear; male voices retain grit without thickness, while female vocals sound airy and sweet. Treble presents shimmer and clarity in a non-fatiguing way—ideal for long listens, though not for fans of aggressively boosted highs or outright bass-head needs.

Technical performance is a highlight: resolution, separation, imaging, and stage depth rank among the best at the price, creating immersive layering and precise placement even on busy tracks. Versus AFUL Caner, Dawn-X offers stronger, tighter bass, smoother treble, better comfort, and more refined layering; compared to FiiO’s FX17 and BGVP Solomon, it sounds cleaner, more naturally voiced, and less fatiguing. Against Elleian Apostle, the Apostle hits harder down low, while Dawn-X feels more balanced and immersive. Recommended for those who want a fun-yet-natural, all-rounder flagship with effortless treble and textured mids—less so for meta-leaning bright V tunings or very small ears. Final verdict: 4.5/5, a top contender at its price.


Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
Clean, balanced, neutral sound with good layering and tech. Relaxing vocals, but lacks power and last bit of vocal extension. Bass has good controll, but lacks impact. Has sizzly planar timbre in the treble. Safe but forgettable.
Youtube Video Summary

Performer 7 lands with a neutral-balanced, laid-back tuning and good treble reach. The presentation is clean and generally safe, though there’s a touch of sizzly “planar-ish” timbre up top. Technicals are solid for ~$200—slightly behind sets like Quintet and Super Mix 4, about on par with Nova. Bass from the dual 6 mm DDs is tight, controlled, and free of bleed, but lacks the slam and rumble of competitors using larger drivers; mids are well separated with decent layering.

The weak spot is vocal extension: a push around 1.5 kHz tries to bring them forward, but a dip through 3–6 kHz keeps them from opening up. Tamer upper-mids help avoid fatigue for rock/metal, yet the modest low-end impact leaves drums and basslines feeling uneventful. It’s a mid-volume set that doesn’t scale well—turning it up accentuates the 1.5 kHz emphasis and treble sizzle. Treble isn’t peaky, just a bit glassy at times; for K-pop the smoother mids can work if less extended vocals are acceptable.

As a value play, there are stronger options: Nova, Chopan, and Super Mix 4 offer better bang-for-buck; for a similar clean/neutral target, Tanchjim Origin sounds more natural with better bass texture and vocal reach, and DynaQuattro adds sub-bass and fuller vocals—none with the planar-ish timbre. Even AFUL’s own P5 is cheaper and more fun, while the Explorer undercuts the price and scales impressively. In today’s crowded market, P7 is a competent all-rounder but not distinctive enough to stand out.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S- Tech
Smooth treble, natural timbre, good sub-bass focused set, but transients can be a bit soft, and vocals are pulled back lacking final extension - non-fatiguing but not very engaging and "dynamic". A bassier 5+2 with smoother/more natural treble. Reminds me of the Luna but less mid-bass/vocals, more sub, and a little smoother. Bassy all-rounder like MK4 bass switch but with pulled back vocals, and less versatile since no switch option.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech

The AFUL Performer 5+2 (also listed as “Performer 7”) uses a 2DD+4BA+1 micro planar driver array and AFUL’s LC-network crossover plus a 3D-printed acoustic tube system, aiming for clean band splits without smearing. The shell also integrates a high-damping air-pressure balance system, a design AFUL has used across its line. Official listings put MSRP around $229 and outline the same core tech features.

Tonally it trends neutral with a sub-bass lift: bass has solid depth and texture, mids stay relatively linear, and the presence/treble region adds energy without veering into sharpness on most chains. Multiple reviews characterize it as warm-neutral with bass boost or slightly V-shaped depending on perspective, which matches listening notes about a lively but controlled upper end. Sensitivity and load are portable-friendly (≈109 dB, 15 Ω), so it reaches performance without demanding amplification.

Technicalities are competitive for the class: imaging is tidy with good instrument separation, micro-detail retrieval is above average, and soundstage is moderate (more width than depth). Build and comfort are typical resin-shell fare; some users note occasional lower-treble bite depending on tips and recordings, so treble-sensitive listeners may wish to pair accordingly. Overall value is strong at its price, especially if a clean, bass-supported neutral curve is the priority.


Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: A

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech

The AFUL Dawn-X is a 14-driver quadbrid IEM—1DD+8BA+4EST+1BC—wired together via a six-way electronic + physical crossover and AFUL’s 3D Micro-Resonance acoustic paths; the stabilized-wood shells and included 6N copper cable reinforce its flagship positioning. Specs are published at 15 Ω and 101 dB sensitivity, with an official MSRP of $1,299.99.

Early listening reports describe a balanced-to-U-shaped tuning with textured sub-bass, forward yet clean vocals, and airy treble extension; some note abundant micro-detail that can make the stage feel more intimate on certain tracks. AFUL also claims a “Wideband Electrostatic” implementation letting EST drivers contribute from ~5 kHz upward, which aligns with impressions of crisp but smooth top-end energy.

Objectively, the Dawn-X targets high technical performance—resolution, imaging precision, and treble refinement—more than aggressive coloration, which suits critical listening but may read as slightly cool on some material. Given the price bracket, value hinges on a buyer needing its specific mix of detail retrieval and composure versus similarly ambitious hybrids from rivals at or below the same MSRP.


Bass: S- Mids: A+ Treble: S- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: A+

Aful Performer 5+2 (more reviews)

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 8 * score rescaled + normalized
Evolution of the Performer 5 tuning. Smoother, airier treble, deeper, punchier bass. Fantastic All-rounder with incredible resolution for the price. 2-Pin connectors have some quality issues
Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Performer 5+2 (Performer 7 / P7) takes the P5 recipe and adds a second 6 mm dynamic for the lows and a micro-planar for the highs, nudging MSRP to $240. Unboxing mirrors the P5: nine pairs of tips and a decent case, but the accessories feel bare-bones at this price—no foam tips and a non-modular cable, even though the included 8-wire is supple and well-behaved. Build is classic AFUL: 3D-printed resin, blended nozzle (no mesh or lip—watch tip retention), single rear vent, and striking blue-green mosaic shells inspired by Suzhou gardens—cool-wall approved with four compliments to one “meh.” Fit is semi-custom and a touch chunkier than P5; comfortable for most, a conditional pass for small ears. Note a sporadic batch quirk: some units have over-tight 2-pin sockets; exchanges fixed it for affected buyers.

Tuning sits in warm-leaning neutral territory. The dual dynamics deliver punchy, textured bass that rumbles without bloating; guitars and drums carry convincing weight. Mids are the star—rich, full-bodied, vocal-forward without shout, with clean separation and natural tone. Treble from the micro-planar is smooth yet energetic: cymbals and vocal harmonics sparkle, special effects have bite and body, and only treble-sensitives may find hot mixes a bit lively. Technicalities impress for the money—detail retrieval and nuance feel a class up—while stage and imaging are solid rather than showy.

Against peers: the Tangzu x HBB budget pick mirrors the overall tonality but P7 offers higher resolution and more treble finesse; the planar “Heyday” alternative is brighter/faster with leaner bass; versus Performer 5, P7 brings tighter low-end, smoother treble, and better extremes detail; the Fresh-collab competitor pushes vocals further forward with bigger stage but leaner lower mids. Verdict: a versatile all-rounder that suits broad libraries and even content creation thanks to its balanced tonality and detail. Not for bassheads, trebleheads, or strict Harman-lean seekers, and the accessory pack/cable quirk holds it back from a slam-dunk. For roughly $240, though, it’s a brilliant, resolving upgrade in the AFUL line.


Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
check links for more info:

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+

AFUL Dawn-X (more reviews)

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 9 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the AFUL DAWN-X at an average of 5.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Masterpiece.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Aful Performer 5+2 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

AFUL Dawn-X User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Aful Performer 5+2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.7

Gaming Grade

A

AFUL Dawn-X Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.1

Gaming Grade

A+

Aful Performer 5+2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Overall technical control is strong, presenting instruments with clarity and sensible staging. Textures are portrayed with satisfying clarity.
Bass A+
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids A+
It offers a luxurious, resolving midrange that captures micro-detail beautifully. Every vocal inflection is captured.
Treble A
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics A
It delivers crisp, authoritative dynamics that keep music thrilling. Subtle level shifts are clearly conveyed.
Soundstage A
Immersion steps up dramatically as width, depth, and height integrate into a cohesive hologram. Everything sounds naturally spaced.
Details A
Low-level information blossoms, presenting a rich tapestry of articulate sound. Analytical listeners will be delighted.
Imaging A
Spatial cues respond immediately, reflecting every movement in the mix. Spatial cues respond instantly to the mix.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion.

AFUL Dawn-X Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Tonal balance reaches a highly refined state, sounding seamless from lows to highs. Everything locks together with satisfying coherence.

Average Technical Grade

S
  • Expect an effortlessly clean presentation that keeps complex mixes perfectly organized. There is zero sense of congestion even at high volume.
Bass S-
Expect a gripping low-end presence that marries clarity with visceral impact. Dynamic swings land with thrilling force.
Mids S-
The midrange sounds refined and revealing, balancing clarity with emotional weight. Timbre accuracy rivals studio monitors.
Treble S-
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics A
The system snaps into action with precision, highlighting every swell. Recordings feel energetic and alive.
Soundstage S-
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Details S-
No subtlety is too small; the presentation exposes it all with composure. Complex tracks remain crystal clear.
Imaging A+
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Premium pricing warrants consideration of gaming-first alternatives for lower cost

Aful Performer 5+2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

AFUL Dawn-X User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer