EPZ 530 VS BGVP Astrum

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

EPZ 530 and BGVP Astrum use 5BA and 2DD+2BA+2EST driver setups respectively. EPZ 530 costs $700 while BGVP Astrum costs $699. EPZ 530 is $1 more expensive. EPZ 530 holds a decisive 1-point edge in reviewer scores (8 vs 7). BGVP Astrum has better mids with a 0.7-point edge, BGVP Astrum has better treble with a 0.5-point edge, BGVP Astrum has significantly better dynamics with a 1.1-point edge and EPZ 530 has significantly better soundstage with a 1.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric EPZ 530 BGVP Astrum
Bass 8 7
Mids 6 6.7
Treble 7 7.5
Details 8 6.9
Soundstage 8 6.5
Imaging 8 8.4
Dynamics 7 8.1
Tonality 7.5 6.8
Technicalities 7.5 6.8
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough EPZ 530 and BGVP Astrum reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

EPZ 530 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8

Strongly Favorable


BGVP Astrum Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

EPZ 530 (more reviews)

EPZ 530 reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

EPZ 530 delivers a distinctly warm, intimate presentation with forward vocals and a close, enveloping stage that can feel like a gentle heat lamp over the mix. It’s a 5BA set tuned for body and energy rather than forensic micro-detail, with a slight low-end bump that rides smoothly into the lower mids and treble that’s “just enough” to avoid dullness. Tip and amp choices matter: with Render/DUNU-style tips and especially a tube amp, the stage opens up and the tonality gains sparkle, turning the 530 into a bit of a chameleon across sources while keeping that baritone-rich core.

Build is eye-catching with wood shells in mossy green and gold accents, plus a braided 3-in-1 cable advertised as gold/silver/copper with a palladium alloy. The aesthetic pops, but there are quibbles: hints of wood splintering on the box, a clear-bead chin slider that feels out of place at this tier, and a lean accessory pack (limited tips, no foams, modest case). Marketing copy still says “moving iron” for balanced armatures, which doesn’t inspire confidence.

Value is the sticking point. The blind estimate pegged it around $420–$550 based on sound; retail shows $700–$745, which feels ambitious for EPZ as a brand and for what’s in the box. Sonically, though, the set is clean, engaging, and excellent on tubes, earning an 8/10 for sound quality. At full MSRP, expect to debate the extras; at around $500 on sale, it becomes an easy recommendation for listeners craving warmth, intimate vocals, and source-tunable character over analytical precision.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your EPZ 530 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $443

Buy EPZ 530 on Linsoul

EPZ 530 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
It does some things very well. Very good item.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

EPZ 530 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Great set for jazz/blues/soul/acoustic. Thick and lush. Warm but with nice treble extension. Solid tech. Vocals can be overly husky and buried in busier songs.
Youtube Video Summary

EPZ 530 comes across as a warm-tilted set with elevated mid-bass that adds body and texture, yet keeps a sharp, airy treble for bite. Compared with ultra-aggressive sets like Gaea, the upper mids are less intense and overall fatigue is lower, while resolution sits a notch down—closer to EJ07M territory than true kilobuck flagships. The tuning makes jazz, blues, and instrumental tracks shine: bass is meaty, timing feels lively, and cymbals have enough sparkle to stay engaging without turning harsh.

Trade-offs show up with vocals: extra mid-bass plus a ~1.5 kHz dip/masking can make voices sound husky, less open, and a bit veiled in busier mixes; for clearer, airier vocals, sets like OG Oracle, EJ07M, Variations, or Studio 4S still take the lead. The stage is intimate to average, slightly smaller than Gaea, but coherent and focused. As a warm, non-Harman/DF alternative that still offers treble extension and air, 530 is a distinctive pick—helped by a gorgeous amber colorway, a neat wooden box presentation, and seemingly solid QC. Cables won’t transform its sound, but a well-built one adds comfort and durability; save the big spend there.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

EPZ 530 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.3 * score rescaled + normalized
8 community members have rated the EPZ 530 at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

BGVP Astrum (more reviews)

BGVP Astrum reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 5.6 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
A pronounced 5 kHz rise creates "fake detail" and flattens staging; EST treble is capable but masked unless EQ reduces 5 kHz and lifts 10 kHz. Attractive build with lively bass and a competent EST treble once EQ tames the 5 kHz emphasis. Pronounced 5 kHz peak causes fatigue and a flat, congested stage, with bass turning boomy at higher volume; needs EQ.
Youtube Video Summary

A 2DD + 2BA + 2EST hybrid around $700, Astrum follows a low 2 kHz dip to avoid shout then a pronounced 5 kHz rise to restore energy, which for sensitive listeners reads as "fake detail". The result is a bright spot in the wrong place: presentation turns flat, 2D, and congested, with female vocals pushed forward while nuance is missing. Bass from the dual 8 mm drivers is lively yet grows boomy as volume increases, masking the contribution of the EST drivers.

Midrange texture and resolution feel compressed and digital, failing to convey natural timbre; the upper end fares better once the 5 kHz emphasis is reduced, revealing a competent EST implementation. Without EQ to lower roughly 5 kHz and add some 10 kHz, the treble transition lacks smoothness and stage perception stays small and 2D. For listeners not bothered by 5 kHz it can sound present and fun, but for those who are, this tuning choice undermines technicalities and realism.

Bass: B Mids: C+ Treble: B Soundstage: C Details: C+

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

BGVP Astrum reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech

The BGVP Astrum is a tribrid IEM with a 2DD+2BA+2EST array, using a coaxial dual 8 mm dynamic module for lows, Knowles BAs for mids/highs, and Sonion ESTs for the ultra-treble. This configuration, along with a four-way crossover, targets a balanced, resolving presentation rather than sheer bass quantity.

Early coverage characterizes the tuning as smooth, coherent, and broadly versatile—more “balanced W-shaped” than aggressively V-shaped—delivering clarity and air without pronounced sibilance. It is also repeatedly noted as not for bassheads: bass is controlled and musical rather than maximal.

Build and accessories are a clear focus: the shells are lightweight with preserved-flower resin aesthetics, and the unboxing is unusually elaborate; the stock cable is a braided 0.78 mm 2-pin with 4.4 mm termination. At an MSRP of \$699, the Astrum competes in an increasingly crowded mid/upper-tier where its strengths are tonal refinement, treble openness, and overall technical polish rather than visceral slam.


Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: S- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: A+

EPZ 530 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

BGVP Astrum User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EPZ 530 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

BGVP Astrum Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.3

Gaming Grade

B

EPZ 530 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • The response is even and composed, lending itself to effortless genre hopping. Voices sit comfortably in the mix.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • You get a well-rounded technical package that keeps separation, detail, and staging in harmony. It's a solid middle ground between fun and fidelity.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics A-
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage A+
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

BGVP Astrum Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass A-
Bass is strong and well-defined, delivering slam with admirable control. Electronic drops hit with authority.
Mids B+
Midrange presence is good, delivering clear vocals and solid texture. Voices come through with pleasing clarity.
Treble A
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics A+
It captures both explosive hits and delicate shifts with lifelike realism. Micro-dynamics shimmer through the mix.
Soundstage B+
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Details B+
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances that keeps complex passages intelligible. Micro-details pop without sounding forced.
Imaging A+
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision that creates a palpable sense of placement. It creates a near-holographic placement.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

EPZ 530 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

BGVP Astrum User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer