Binary Dynaquattro VS Aful Performer 5+2
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Binary Dynaquattro and Aful Performer 5+2 use 4DD and 2DD+4BA+1PLA driver setups respectively. Binary Dynaquattro costs $260 while Aful Performer 5+2 costs $239. Binary Dynaquattro is $21 more expensive. Aful Performer 5+2 holds a slight 0.3-point edge in reviewer scores (7.4 vs 7.7). Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better treble with a 1.5-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Binary Dynaquattro | Aful Performer 5+2 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 7.4 | 8 |
| Mids | 6 | 8 |
| Treble | 6 | 7.5 |
| Soundstage | 7 | 8 |
| Dynamics | 8 | 7 |
| Gaming capabilities | 6.9 | 7.4 |
Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score
Binary Dynaquattro Average Reviewer Scores
Aful Performer 5+2 Aggregated Review Score
Aful Performer 5+2 Average Reviewer Scores
Binary Dynaquattro Details
Driver Configuration: 4DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $260
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Aful Performer 5+2 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+4BA+1PLA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $239
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score
Binary Dynaquattro Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Aful Performer 5+2 User Review Score
Aful Performer 5+2 Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.9Gaming Grade
B+Aful Performer 5+2 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.4Gaming Grade
A-Binary Dynaquattro Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A-- Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Aful Performer 5+2 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Binary Dynaquattro Reviews
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Z-Reviews
7.2
* score normalized
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
Natural vocals, good treble extension, bass is tight and more resolving vs 61t and Davinci. Overall very well balanced and clean. There are some small peaks at 8-10k and 15-20K which can be an issue on some songs, and there is masking around 4-8k region, but overall, solid all-rounder. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Jaytiss
7.8
Reviewer Score
It has great tuning, but lack serverly in some areas. Very fun. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel
7.5
Reviewer Score
Shines when driven properly. Excellent bass, vocal-forward tuning, and natural timbre. Hard to drive, could use more treble extension.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
Aful Performer 5+2 Reviews
Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by: Z-Reviews
8.5
* score normalized
Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by: Super* Review
8*
* score normalized
Overall it is sounding more visceral and incisive than the Performer 5.Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by: Jays Audio
6.5
Reviewer Score
Clean, balanced, neutral sound with good layering and tech. Relaxing vocals, but lacks power and last bit of vocal extension. Bass has good controll, but lacks impact. Has sizzly planar timbre in the treble. Safe but forgettable. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by: Tim Tuned
7
Reviewer Score
check links for more info: Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel
7.5
Reviewer Score
A detailed, engaging all-rounder that's exciting without being shouty or harsh. Smooth, neutral tuning with a bass boost, excellent bass quality, clean mids, forward vocals, and sparkly, incisive treble. Great detail. I wouldn’t change a thing.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by: Jaytiss
8.5
Reviewer Score
My kind of neutral, improves a lot on my favorites. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Binary Dynaquattro User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewAful Performer 5+2 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review