Canpur CP622B VS AFUL Dawn-X

Youtube Video Summary

Canpur CP622B makes a striking first impression with a premium case, tidy accessories, and a shimmering faceplate—but the shell is huge, bordering on chunky, and can push fit comfort limits over longer sessions. Sonically, it hits with authoritative sub-bass and impressive extension, yet the overall presentation skews dark; vocals sit a touch recessed, with a wish for more 1.5–3 kHz presence and a bit more upper-air sparkle. Out of the box it already thumps, but a light EQ lift to upper mids and bass can coax out more vibration and energy.

On graphs and in A/Bs, the CP622B comes off as a specialist: fantastic low-end texture (bass judged around 9.5 for level), solid resolution and stage, but imaging feels slightly constrained by the muted 3 kHz region. Compared with peers, FATfreq Grand Maestro reads like the safer “one-and-done” all-rounder with more flair up top; Aful Cantor delivers comparable presence at a fraction of the cost; Hisenior Mega5-EST Bass offers a friendlier fit and a tuning that can feel just a hair more balanced; and as a personal north star, Elysian Annihilator 2023 still sets the bar for extension and excitement. Net: a fantastically built, bass-thrilling CP622B that shines with hip-hop/R&B and cinematic lows, but reads as niche and pricey—a connoisseur’s piece for big collections rather than a first-pick endgame.

Youtube Video Summary

Large, sculpted shells with a bulbous rear (housing the bone conductor) make the Aful Dawn-X a substantial fit—comfortable for some, but risky for small ears. The stock cable feels quality but is 4.4 mm-only, and the case/accessories are tidy; importantly, the nozzle grips tips securely (unlike some past AFUL sets). Overall build is handsome and premium, with fit being the main variable.

Sonically, the tuning favors sub-bass over mid-bass, pairs rich mids with smooth, natural treble that avoids harsh spikes yet has mild 4–6 kHz energy, and presents a cohesive, almost speaker-like soundstage. It wakes up with a bit of volume/power, prioritizing clarity, micro-detail and air over outright slam; the bone conductor subtly supports the midrange more than the lows. At $1,300 it’s competitive for listeners chasing technical refinement and a natural tonality, while value seekers or mid-bass lovers may prefer cheaper AFUL options or sets with more punch.

Youtube Video Summary

Canpur CP622B is positioned as a true apex set among today’s ultra-high-end IEMs—think Storm, Grand Maestro, Pearl, Multiverse, RN6—where differences are subtle and taste-dependent, not about basic quality. The message is simple: once at the Money Trees level, most flagships are excellent; the CP622B stands out by pushing resolution and authenticity to the top of that pile while keeping music the focus.

Evaluation leans on a tight suite of reference cues: bass definition via Black Sabbath “Sweet Leaf” (2:36–3:10), midrange texture with Soundgarden “Spoonman” (spoons/vocals) and Neil Young “The Needle and the Damage Done,” and treble control from Aerosmith “No More No More” (recurring cymbal strikes). Micro-details and spatial tells include Michael Jackson’s beep, Violent Femmes finger snaps, the crowd-side triangulation in Lynyrd Skynyrd’s “Freebird,” Pink Floyd’s gate announcement in “On the Run,” Randy Rhoads’ finger slide in “Dee,” and the famous cough in “Wish You Were Here.” These checkpoints spotlight the CP622B’s clarity, attack/decay, and rare sense of depth for an in-ear.

Two practical notes seal it: level-matched A/B at 77 dB @ 440 Hz versus Subtonic Storm to ensure fair comparison, and a low-frequency test around ~42 Hz that makes the shells physically vibrate, delivering that body-felt slam prized in hip-hop and recognized in orchestral power. With a library spanning ACDC, Alice in Chains, Bob Marley, Dre, Kendrick, Metallica, Pink Floyd and more, CP622B reads as a top-tier all-rounder—immense detail at low volumes, potentially intense when cranked, and an easy recommendation for those chasing the very best.

Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X goes straight for spectacle: a $1,300 tribrid behemoth with 14 drivers per side—one dynamic, eight BAs, four electrostats, and a bone conductor—that turns familiar tracks into a surreal remix. The presentation is described as “Poltergeist in an IEM,” with spatial effects that feel like a live DSP engine: four imaginary DJs slicing and reassembling the mix on the fly. Every song becomes an event—an Unreal-Engine-in-a-cave vibe—yet it stays coherent enough to be addictive rather than broken, delivering a wildly unique listen that nothing else in the collection replicates.

Forget reading the squiggle: measurements look “normal,” but the sound is anything but. The stage is huge, imaging is hyper-layered, and transient effects pop out and retract with uncanny tactility—great for ASMR, movies, and games where holographic placement sells the illusion. Despite the driver count, it’s not hard to drive; volume needs are moderate, nowhere near planar-pain territory. This is the “break-glass-when-bored” set—the one to pull out after years in the hobby when everything else feels samey and a jolt of abnormal brilliance is required.

Build and accessories match the price: gargantuan shells with stabilized wooden faceplates, a premium cable, a neat leather strap, and a buffet of individually boxed tips, though termination is a simple 3.5 or 4.4 choice. Ergonomics demand some ear real estate, but the payoff is a sound signature that’s gloriously weird and deeply entertaining. Recommendation: not a first or only IEM—save it for collectors who already have “normal” covered and want a statement piece that rewires how music feels.

Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a premium, resin-shelled flagship with a striking red-wood faceplate, a soft 4.4 mm cable, a protective zipper case, and multiple silicone tips. The shells run large but are well-contoured and vented, offering excellent comfort for extended sessions; those with smaller ears should demo first. Build and accessories are solid overall, with only some cable memory above the chin slider worth noting.

Tuning follows a mild V-shape: a moderate, textured bass lift; natural mids with lifelike vocal timbre; and a smooth, extended treble that brings air and detail without harshness. Kicks have weight and EDM carries rumble, yet vocals remain clear; male voices retain grit without thickness, while female vocals sound airy and sweet. Treble presents shimmer and clarity in a non-fatiguing way—ideal for long listens, though not for fans of aggressively boosted highs or outright bass-head needs.

Technical performance is a highlight: resolution, separation, imaging, and stage depth rank among the best at the price, creating immersive layering and precise placement even on busy tracks. Versus AFUL Caner, Dawn-X offers stronger, tighter bass, smoother treble, better comfort, and more refined layering; compared to FiiO’s FX17 and BGVP Solomon, it sounds cleaner, more naturally voiced, and less fatiguing. Against Elleian Apostle, the Apostle hits harder down low, while Dawn-X feels more balanced and immersive. Recommended for those who want a fun-yet-natural, all-rounder flagship with effortless treble and textured mids—less so for meta-leaning bright V tunings or very small ears. Final verdict: 4.5/5, a top contender at its price.

Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a 12-driver quad-brid flagship (1 DD, 8 BA, 4 EST, 1 bone conduction) priced at $1,300. The unboxing mirrors AFUL’s higher-end sets: big leather case, cable clip, four ear-tip sets, cleaning brush, plus a soft but slightly memory-prone cable available in 3.5 or 4.4—and given the set’s power hunger, 4.4 makes sense. Design skews conservative: a red stabilized-wood faceplate paired with a plain black shell that doesn’t showcase the intricate internals. The shell is also very large (think Monarch-sized), creating comfort issues; small ears will struggle. Tip sensitivity is high, and stock tips provide the most balanced result.

Tonally this is classic AFUL house sound: a mild V with a slightly warm, musical tilt that remains balanced overall. Bass hits with punch, texture, and sub-bass rumble without bloat—ample enough for bass fans yet controlled. The midrange is a standout: natural, lush vocals with male voices gaining a touch from the warmth and female vocals kept more neutral, preserving timbral authenticity and emotional nuance. Treble is rich, smooth, and well-extended; the ESTs are tuned tastefully—no harsh glare—adding just the right air and sparkle. The bone-conduction driver focuses on mids and stays subtle in practice.

Technically, Dawn-X competes with top peers: high resolution, excellent separation, and rare cohesion for a multi-driver design. Imaging and layering feel strikingly realistic, while stage favors depth over width (wider sets like Fatfreq Quantum still outspread it). As a recommendation, it suits listeners seeking a slightly warm, highly detailed, all-rounder; it’s not ideal for small ears, lean-bass preferences, or those wanting brighter upper-mids/treble. Despite strong diminishing returns above mid-fi prices, Dawn-X punches above its tag and earns a rare two-star recommendation from Kois Archive—a flagship that feels genuinely special if the fit works.

Youtube Video Summary

AFUL’s house sound shows up here in its most polished form: Dawn-X is a tribrid (1DD + 8BA + 4EST + bone conduction) flagship at $1,300 that prioritizes consistent fit and execution over flash. Build is understated with stabilized-wood faceplates, above-average isolation, and a medium/medium-large shell that fits better—and more consistently—than the Cantor. The accessory loadout is solid (four silicone tip sets, large but well-made case), though the stock cable does not have swappable terminations (choose 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm).

Tonally, it’s a balanced, warmer-leaning take on AFUL’s signature: a dense, controlled bass that borders on decadent yet stays quick and clean, slightly relaxed mids, and a precise, mildly forward lower-treble that keeps definition high without tipping into harshness for most listeners. Stage favors front-to-back depth over width; transients are clean and a touch clinical, giving strong separation without sounding smeary. The result is a mature, confident presentation that reads refined rather than showy.

Against peers: versus Cantor, Dawn-X is warmer, smoother, and far more consistent thanks to fit; Cantor can sound brighter and a bit wider. Compared with FiiO FX17, Dawn-X has tighter bass and crisper treble, where FX17 feels looser and fuller. The 64 Audio U4s plays softer and wider; Dawn-X is more precise/clinical. DUNU Glacier hits harder and more V-shaped with smoother treble but less natural acoustic timbre; Dawn-X sounds truer on instruments. Versus ThieAudio Monarch MK4, MK4 is more neutral, vocal-forward with greater width, while Dawn-X offers denser low-end and a calmer demeanor—and a friendlier fit for many ears. Verdict: 3/5 stars—not the flashiest in its bracket, but arguably AFUL’s best execution yet of its signature sound.