Canpur CP622B VS Canpur CP74E

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Canpur CP622B and Canpur CP74E use 6BA+2EST+2BC and 7BA+4EST driver setups respectively. Canpur CP622B costs $3,500 while Canpur CP74E costs $2,900. Canpur CP622B is $600 more expensive. Canpur CP622B holds a clear 0.5-point edge in reviewer scores (8.8 vs 8.4). Canpur CP622B has better bass with a 0.5-point edge, Canpur CP622B has better mids with a 0.5-point edge, Canpur CP74E has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge, Canpur CP622B has better details with a 0.5-point edge and Canpur CP622B has slightly better imaging with a 0.3-point edge.

Insights

Metric Canpur CP622B Canpur CP74E
Bass 8.5 8
Mids 8.6 8.2
Treble 8 8.2
Details 9 8.5
Soundstage 8.5 9
Imaging 8.8 8.5
Dynamics 8 8
Tonality 8.5 7.9
Technicalities 8.5 8.7
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Canpur CP74E reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Canpur CP622B Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.8

Excellent


Canpur CP74E Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.4

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

Canpur CP622B reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 9.2 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Similar to the Storm, but with greater focus to bass dynamics at the cost of less clarity Price

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: S Mids: S Treble: S Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S

Canpur CP74E reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 8.8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
Retains all the techs of the 622b with a more tamed bass presentation, overall arguably more balanced sounding than the 622b Bass transition to lower midrange may not work well for slower genres requiring a higher midbass shelf; less versatile

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: S Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S

Canpur CP622B reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 8.7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S Tech
Resolution and tactile slam with not ultra boosted bass. brilliant tuning. Tactility only shows under extreme bass hits between 50 and 100Hz. Not sure why? Otherwise very oudiophile replay of rhythm section
Youtube Video Summary

Canpur CP622B is positioned as a true apex set among today’s ultra-high-end IEMs—think Storm, Grand Maestro, Pearl, Multiverse, RN6—where differences are subtle and taste-dependent, not about basic quality. The message is simple: once at the Money Trees level, most flagships are excellent; the CP622B stands out by pushing resolution and authenticity to the top of that pile while keeping music the focus.

Evaluation leans on a tight suite of reference cues: bass definition via Black Sabbath “Sweet Leaf” (2:36–3:10), midrange texture with Soundgarden “Spoonman” (spoons/vocals) and Neil Young “The Needle and the Damage Done,” and treble control from Aerosmith “No More No More” (recurring cymbal strikes). Micro-details and spatial tells include Michael Jackson’s beep, Violent Femmes finger snaps, the crowd-side triangulation in Lynyrd Skynyrd’s “Freebird,” Pink Floyd’s gate announcement in “On the Run,” Randy Rhoads’ finger slide in “Dee,” and the famous cough in “Wish You Were Here.” These checkpoints spotlight the CP622B’s clarity, attack/decay, and rare sense of depth for an in-ear.

Two practical notes seal it: level-matched A/B at 77 dB @ 440 Hz versus Subtonic Storm to ensure fair comparison, and a low-frequency test around ~42 Hz that makes the shells physically vibrate, delivering that body-felt slam prized in hip-hop and recognized in orchestral power. With a library spanning ACDC, Alice in Chains, Bob Marley, Dre, Kendrick, Metallica, Pink Floyd and more, CP622B reads as a top-tier all-rounder—immense detail at low volumes, potentially intense when cranked, and an easy recommendation for those chasing the very best.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+

URL to full Review

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel

Canpur CP74E reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 8.3 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
S Tech
Youtube Video Summary

Canpur’s CP74E steps in as the “just-under-flagship” sibling to the CP622B, packing 7 balanced armatures + 4 EST (11 drivers) and a neutral-warm tuning. The graph shows a tidy ~10 dB box from 20 Hz–20 kHz with no wild spikes, and the presentation reads vocal-centric: clear, natural mids without bloated mid-bass or shouty ear-gain. Sub-bass doesn’t hit with the same bone-conducted heft as the 622B, yet the low end is clean and modern for a BA stack, making it hard to distinguish from a dynamic driver on many tracks.

Instrument timbre is a highlight: four- and five-string bass lines showcase lifelike plucks, releases, and string ring; kick drum authority sits in a similar energy window to 64 Audio’s U12t—not a bass cannon, but solid, warm drive. Treble looks slightly more extended past 8 kHz on paper, though in practice the upper harmonics don’t come across as notably brighter. The real gap with the 622B isn’t up top—it’s the 50–500 Hz region, where the flagship’s BCD magic brings extra life, reverb, and decay; the CP74E stays more polite and traditional, albeit with high-quality resolution.

Positioned around $2,700, the CP74E competes strongly with peers and earns a confident “would buy” verdict. It’s the set to choose when the 622B is out of reach but the goal is excellent vocals, realistic instrument texture, and a warm, refined balance. Not the throne usurper—that stays with the 622B—but a serious contender that should fare well against heavy hitters like Grand Maestro and Storm in broader comparisons.

Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A+

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel

Canpur CP622B reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 8.4 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Highly technical with great tuning and vocals. Punchy mid-bass with great sub-bass extension. Can sound somewhat unexciting and dry on some sources. Cons: Poor quality stock cable.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Details: S Imaging: S-

Canpur CP74E reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Punchy bass with some bass body bloat. Pleasant, euphonic vocal timbre with good note body. Decent treble minus the lower/mid-treble dip.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: S- Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Canpur CP622B (more reviews)

Canpur CP622B reviewed by Yifang

Yifang 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Tonally excellent and technicalities are fantastic. Works as an all-rounder with little to no flaws. Mids could be a little better, BCD effect could be improved on.

Yifang original ranking

Yifang Youtube Channel

Canpur CP622B reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
A good set, but lacks magic for me to justify keeping.
Youtube Video Summary

Canpur CP622B makes a striking first impression with a premium case, tidy accessories, and a shimmering faceplate—but the shell is huge, bordering on chunky, and can push fit comfort limits over longer sessions. Sonically, it hits with authoritative sub-bass and impressive extension, yet the overall presentation skews dark; vocals sit a touch recessed, with a wish for more 1.5–3 kHz presence and a bit more upper-air sparkle. Out of the box it already thumps, but a light EQ lift to upper mids and bass can coax out more vibration and energy.

On graphs and in A/Bs, the CP622B comes off as a specialist: fantastic low-end texture (bass judged around 9.5 for level), solid resolution and stage, but imaging feels slightly constrained by the muted 3 kHz region. Compared with peers, FATfreq Grand Maestro reads like the safer “one-and-done” all-rounder with more flair up top; Aful Cantor delivers comparable presence at a fraction of the cost; Hisenior Mega5-EST Bass offers a friendlier fit and a tuning that can feel just a hair more balanced; and as a personal north star, Elysian Annihilator 2023 still sets the bar for extension and excitement. Net: a fantastically built, bass-thrilling CP622B that shines with hip-hop/R&B and cinematic lows, but reads as niche and pricey—a connoisseur’s piece for big collections rather than a first-pick endgame.

Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Canpur CP622B User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Canpur CP74E User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Canpur CP622B Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

Canpur CP74E Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

Canpur CP622B Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Expect a tasteful, well-judged response that feels both musical and true to the source. Great synergy with a wide range of genres.

Average Technical Grade

S-
  • Clarity and detail leap forward, with precise imaging and an expansive stage. Orchestral works feel spacious and layered.
Bass S-
The bass digs deep with authority while staying impeccably textured. No sense of bloom muddies the mids.
Mids S-
Midrange quality is superb, rich with resolving power and transparency. Micro-details leap out effortlessly.
Treble A+
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics A+
Expect thrilling dynamics that move effortlessly from whispers to roars. Explosive moments sound thrilling.
Soundstage S-
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.
Details S
Nothing is lost; you hear the absolute truth of the source material. There's nothing left to the imagination.
Imaging S-
The stage breathes like a real environment, surrounding you with believable depth. There's a strong sensation of physical space.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Canpur CP74E Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

S-
  • Clarity and detail leap forward, with precise imaging and an expansive stage. Orchestral works feel spacious and layered.
Bass A+
It delivers flagship-worthy bass, rich in both rumble and nuance. Reference tracks showcase its grip.
Mids A+
Expect an immersive mid band where every vocal inflection and texture shines. Complex arrangements stay perfectly composed.
Treble A+
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics A+
Dynamic range is superb, blending powerful impact with nuanced control. It captures both whisper and roar effortlessly.
Soundstage S
Venue reproduction feels transcendent, portraying a limitless hall with absolute positional certainty. Imaging remains rock solid at all times.
Details S-
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers while maintaining natural timbre. It uncovers hidden layers with ease.
Imaging S-
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Canpur CP622B User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Canpur CP74E User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer