Empire Ears Raven VS Canpur CP74E

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Empire Ears Raven and Canpur CP74E use 2DD+5BA+4EST+1BC and 7BA+4EST driver setups respectively. Empire Ears Raven costs $3,600 while Canpur CP74E costs $2,900. Empire Ears Raven is $700 more expensive. Empire Ears Raven holds a slight 0.2-point edge in reviewer scores (8.6 vs 8.4). Canpur CP74E has significantly better treble with a 2.2-point edge, Empire Ears Raven has better details with a 0.5-point edge and Empire Ears Raven has better imaging with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Empire Ears Raven Canpur CP74E
Bass 8 8
Mids 8 8.2
Treble 6 8.2
Details 9 8.5
Soundstage 8.6 9
Imaging 9 8.5
Dynamics 8 8
Tonality 8.2 7.9
Technicalities 8.9 8.7
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Empire Ears Raven and Canpur CP74E reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Empire Ears Raven Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.6

Excellent


Canpur CP74E Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.4

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

Empire Ears Raven (more reviews)

Empire Ears Raven reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
V/W Shaped. Energetic treble. Great tech. Fun bass and engaging signature. Overpriced?
Youtube Video Summary

Empire Ears Raven delivers the flagship gloss without pretending to be a value king. Expect deep sub-bass rumble, clean driver control, and a warmer mid-bass emphasis that puts extra weight behind kick drums and bass guitars. That tilt makes Raven a better fit for rock, metal, and live band mixes—grooves hit with authority and instruments carry more body, while treble stays extended without getting spicy or fatiguing.

Against strong $1K contenders, the step up is more refinement than revolution: a roughly 10–15% lift in resolution and texture, not a night-and-day transformation. For pure hip-hop subwoofer thrills, sets with stronger sub-bass focus edge it out; Raven trades some of that in-your-face thump for fuller mid-bass punch and an all-rounder presentation that scales well but isn’t about flexing quantity. Stunning set if the budget is open and rock-first bass weight is the priority; otherwise, mid-tier heavy hitters already capture most of the experience.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Empire Ears Raven reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 8 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
S- Tech
Sounds quite hi-fi and grand sounding, but coherency could use work - bass is distinct from the EST tweeters.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: B Dynamics: A+ Details: S Imaging: S

Empire Ears Raven reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.8 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the Empire Ears Raven at an average of 4.7/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Exceptional.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Canpur CP74E (more reviews)

Canpur CP74E reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 8.8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
Retains all the techs of the 622b with a more tamed bass presentation, overall arguably more balanced sounding than the 622b Bass transition to lower midrange may not work well for slower genres requiring a higher midbass shelf; less versatile

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: S Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S

Canpur CP74E reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 8.3 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
S Tech
Youtube Video Summary

Canpur’s CP74E steps in as the “just-under-flagship” sibling to the CP622B, packing 7 balanced armatures + 4 EST (11 drivers) and a neutral-warm tuning. The graph shows a tidy ~10 dB box from 20 Hz–20 kHz with no wild spikes, and the presentation reads vocal-centric: clear, natural mids without bloated mid-bass or shouty ear-gain. Sub-bass doesn’t hit with the same bone-conducted heft as the 622B, yet the low end is clean and modern for a BA stack, making it hard to distinguish from a dynamic driver on many tracks.

Instrument timbre is a highlight: four- and five-string bass lines showcase lifelike plucks, releases, and string ring; kick drum authority sits in a similar energy window to 64 Audio’s U12t—not a bass cannon, but solid, warm drive. Treble looks slightly more extended past 8 kHz on paper, though in practice the upper harmonics don’t come across as notably brighter. The real gap with the 622B isn’t up top—it’s the 50–500 Hz region, where the flagship’s BCD magic brings extra life, reverb, and decay; the CP74E stays more polite and traditional, albeit with high-quality resolution.

Positioned around $2,700, the CP74E competes strongly with peers and earns a confident “would buy” verdict. It’s the set to choose when the 622B is out of reach but the goal is excellent vocals, realistic instrument texture, and a warm, refined balance. Not the throne usurper—that stays with the 622B—but a serious contender that should fare well against heavy hitters like Grand Maestro and Storm in broader comparisons.

Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A+

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel

Canpur CP74E reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Punchy bass with some bass body bloat. Pleasant, euphonic vocal timbre with good note body. Decent treble minus the lower/mid-treble dip.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: S- Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Empire Ears Raven User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Canpur CP74E User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Empire Ears Raven Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.1

Gaming Grade

A-

Canpur CP74E Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

Empire Ears Raven Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Expect a tasteful, well-judged response that feels both musical and true to the source. Great synergy with a wide range of genres.

Average Technical Grade

S-
  • The presentation is crisp and expansive, handling complex passages with impressive ease. Low-level details remain audible in quiet passages.
Bass A+
Expect a gripping low-end presence that marries clarity with visceral impact. Dynamic swings land with thrilling force.
Mids A+
It offers a luxurious, resolving midrange that captures micro-detail beautifully. Every vocal inflection is captured.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics A+
You get a masterful mix of slam and finesse across every track. Music breathes with realism.
Details S
Resolution reaches the limit of perception, exposing layers you didn't know existed. Clarity remains pristine regardless of complexity.
Imaging S
Reference-class imaging delivers perfectly pinpoint accuracy in 3D space with zero positional drift. Localization is pinpoint-perfect in 3D.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Canpur CP74E Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

S-
  • Clarity and detail leap forward, with precise imaging and an expansive stage. Orchestral works feel spacious and layered.
Bass A+
It delivers flagship-worthy bass, rich in both rumble and nuance. Reference tracks showcase its grip.
Mids A+
Expect an immersive mid band where every vocal inflection and texture shines. Complex arrangements stay perfectly composed.
Treble A+
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics A+
Dynamic range is superb, blending powerful impact with nuanced control. It captures both whisper and roar effortlessly.
Soundstage S
Venue reproduction feels transcendent, portraying a limitless hall with absolute positional certainty. Imaging remains rock solid at all times.
Details S-
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers while maintaining natural timbre. It uncovers hidden layers with ease.
Imaging S-
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Empire Ears Raven User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Canpur CP74E User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer