Ziigaat Nuo VS CCA Phoenix

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Ziigaat Nuo and CCA Phoenix are in-ear monitors. Ziigaat Nuo costs $30 while CCA Phoenix costs $29. Ziigaat Nuo is $1 more expensive. CCA Phoenix holds a clear 0.8-point edge in reviewer scores (5.8 vs 6.6). CCA Phoenix has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and CCA Phoenix has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Ziigaat Nuo CCA Phoenix
Mids 5 5
Treble 3 6
Soundstage 6 6.5
Dynamics 4 5
Tonality 5.7 5.6
Technicalities 4 6

Ziigaat Nuo Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Jays Audio
Fresh Reviews
Z-Reviews Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed


CCA Phoenix Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6.6

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Ziigaat Nuo reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
D Tech
Probably my budget pick under 30. But just strech for 35 for EW200.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: D Dynamics: C- Soundstage: B

CCA Phoenix reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-10-11
Jaytiss 6.6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B Tech
It's a nice easy set, fun and enjoyable.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B+

Ziigaat Nuo (more reviews)

Ziigaat Nuo reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.5 * score rescaled + normalized

Ziigaat Nuo reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score

Ziigaat Nuo reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Woohoo another harman/df! Very similar to the G10, but cheaper with heftier note-weight. Clean budget Harman, highlights vocals very nicely. Can be sharp.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Ziigaat Nuo reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7 * score rescaled + normalized
12 community members have rated the ZiiGaat Nuo at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Ziigaat Nuo User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

CCA Phoenix User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Ziigaat Nuo Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4

Gaming Grade

C-

CCA Phoenix Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

Ziigaat Nuo Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • It sounds pleasant overall, with some uneven spots that hint at room for refinement. Vocals remain pleasant despite the imperfections.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble D
Treble response is uneven, jumping between dull spots and sharp peaks. Peaks poke out unpredictably.
Dynamics C-
Dynamics are average—competent yet lacking real excitement. It keeps music listenable but uninspiring.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

CCA Phoenix Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B+
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

Ziigaat Nuo User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

CCA Phoenix User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer