FATfreq x HBB Deuce VS CCZ Plume
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
FATfreq x HBB Deuce and CCZ Plume use 2DD and 1DD+4BA driver setups respectively. FATfreq x HBB Deuce costs $239 while CCZ Plume costs $200. FATfreq x HBB Deuce is $39 more expensive. FATfreq x HBB Deuce holds a decisive 3.7-point edge in reviewer scores (7.2 vs 3.5).
Insights
| Metric | FATfreq x HBB Deuce | CCZ Plume |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 7 | 3.5 |
| Mids | 7 | 3.5 |
| Treble | 5.5 | 3.5 |
| Soundstage | 6 | 3.5 |
| Dynamics | 6 | 3.5 |
| Tonality | 6.6 | 3 |
| Technicalities | 5.8 | 3 |
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
CCZ Plume Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $239
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
CCZ Plume Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+4BA
Tuning Type: Bassy V
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
CCZ Plume User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.1Gaming Grade
BCCZ Plume Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3Gaming Grade
DFATfreq x HBB Deuce Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
CCZ Plume Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
8.5*
* score normalized
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Audionotions
7.5
Reviewer Score
Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio
7.1
Reviewer Score
Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking
Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
7
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
6.8
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
6
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
CCZ Plume Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
4*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3
Reviewer Score
FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewCCZ Plume User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review