Craft Ears Craft 4 VS EPZ 530

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Craft Ears Craft 4 and EPZ 530 are in-ear monitors. Craft Ears Craft 4 costs $660 while EPZ 530 costs $700. EPZ 530 is $40 more expensive. EPZ 530 holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (6.4 vs 7.7). Craft Ears Craft 4 has better mids with a 0.5-point edge, EPZ 530 has better treble with a 0.5-point edge and EPZ 530 has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Craft Ears Craft 4 EPZ 530
Bass 6 7.7
Mids 6.5 6
Treble 5.5 6
Details 7 7.7
Soundstage 6.5 7
Imaging 7 7.7
Dynamics 6.4 7
Gaming capabilities 6.1 6.6

Craft Ears Craft 4 Aggregated Review Score

Craft Ears Craft 4 Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive


EPZ 530 Aggregated Review Score

EPZ 530 Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio Jaytiss
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

7.7

Strongly Favorable


Craft Ears Craft 4 User Review Score

Craft Ears Craft 4 Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EPZ 530 User Review Score

EPZ 530 Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Craft Ears Craft 4 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

EPZ 530 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

Craft Ears Craft 4 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

EPZ 530 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Craft Ears Craft 4 Reviews

Craft Ears Craft 4 reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 6.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Decent all-rounder, fun sounding monitor Over-emphasis beyond 10khz makes it sound too airy and fatiguing

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B Mids: B+ Treble: B- Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

EPZ 530 Reviews

EPZ 530 reviewed by:

Z-Reviews 8 * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your EPZ 530 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $443

Buy EPZ 530 on Linsoul

EPZ 530 reviewed by:

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Great set for jazz/blues/soul/acoustic. Thick and lush. Warm but with nice treble extension. Solid tech. Vocals can be overly husky and buried in busier songs.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

EPZ 530 reviewed by:

Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It does some things very well. Very good item.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A-

Craft Ears Craft 4 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

EPZ 530 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer