Crinear Meta VS MYER SL224
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Crinear Meta and MYER SL224 use 1DD+2BA and 2DD+2BA+4Micro-Planar driver setups respectively. Crinear Meta costs $250 while MYER SL224 costs $270. MYER SL224 is $20 more expensive. MYER SL224 holds a slight 0.2-point edge in reviewer scores (7.3 vs 7.5). MYER SL224 has significantly better bass with a 1.2-point edge, MYER SL224 has significantly better dynamics with a 1.2-point edge, MYER SL224 has significantly better details with a 1.1-point edge and MYER SL224 has better imaging with a 0.9-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Crinear Meta | MYER SL224 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 7 | 8.2 |
| Mids | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Treble | 7.5 | 7.4 |
| Details | 7 | 8.1 |
| Soundstage | 7.3 | 7.6 |
| Imaging | 7 | 7.9 |
| Dynamics | 7 | 8.2 |
| Tonality | 7.7 | 7.9 |
| Technicalities | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Crinear Meta Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.3Generally Favorable
MYER SL224 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.5Generally Favorable
Reviews Comparison
Crinear Meta reviewed by Jays Audio
7.5
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
CrinEar Meta lands as a clean, balanced, slightly bright-leaning all-rounder with a distinctly sparkly treble. The top end carries a “special sauce” — sharp attack, quick decay, airy cymbal splash and strong micro-detail — creating an open sense of space with tidy separation and layering at around mid-volume (~65 dB). Bass and vocals sit at a “normal” distance: clear and resolving but not emphasized; expect punch rather than deep sub-bass rumble or chesty slam. Fit is tip-dependent: stock silicones can sound peaky; clear soft EPZ tips keep the shimmer without harshness, while “white” Tongu Senai tips smooth the treble further.
Technically, Meta punches above its $250 bracket, hanging with sets like Dusk 3.5 and Estrella for resolution and imaging despite not using ESTs. Timbre stays natural and the build/accessories feel solid. Trade-offs appear when cranking volume: the treble rise can turn fatiguing past ~75–80 dB, especially on bright, electronic-leaning tracks. Genre picks lean toward pop, J-/K-pop, rock, metal, and indie instrumentals at mid-volumes, where the upper-mid cut reins in hot mixes and the sparkle makes cymbals addictive; for hip-hop/rap/EDM, some will want more rumble, slam, and note weight.
Versus Ziigaat Estrella, it’s apples to oranges: Estrella brings more low-end authority and smoother treble with vocals popping forward, while Meta counters with a brighter, sparklier presentation better for K-/J-pop and bands. Against other bright-neutral sets (Dusk, P5+2, Brain Dance), Meta sounds fuller in the low end with a more natural, less sizzly treble; compared to Canon Pro, it’s the more energetic and less laid-back choice. For pure vocals, Volume S, EPZ P50, or Cadenza 4 remain stronger. Scaling champs like Ziigaat Odyssey and AFUL Explorer take higher volumes better but trade away some of Meta’s detail sparkle. Limited-run caveat aside, this is an easy recommendation for listeners wanting a balanced daily driver with distinct, glittery treble at sensible listening levels.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
MYER SL224 reviewed by Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Buy MYER SL224 on HiFiGO
Ad
Price: $230
Buy MYER SL224 on HiFiGO
Crinear Meta (more reviews)
Crinear Meta reviewed by Super* Review
8*
* score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary
CrinEar Project Meta lands as a genuinely significant release: a new brand from Crinacle at an aggressive $250, limited to a small run, with a compact metal shell that fits securely and comfortably. Accessories are sensible (two eartip sets, chunky but protective case), while the swappable termination cable looks great in black/copper yet feels too long and relies on a friction fit that can be cumbersome and a bit kink-prone. Logos are plain, but overall build and ergonomics impress; a slightly shorter tip can improve seal and sound.
Tuning targets the tilted diffuse-field “Meta” profile: essentially neutral from the mids up, coupled with a deliberate, mostly sub-bass boost. The result is more contrasty than many peers—dense low end plus a touch of upper-treble sparkle—without turning sharp or sibilant. Bass is the standout: tighter and more textured than typical “new-meta” sets, though still a hair elevated and capable of sounding heavy on bass-laden tracks. Vocals sit a bit relaxed rather than forward; timbre is excellent, imaging is incisive, and the stage favors depth over width. Tip rolling (slightly shorter or attenuating tips) can tame the sparkle and lock in the balance.
Against rivals, Meta consistently punches up: it edges EPZ P50 and Kiwi Ears K4 with cleaner bass and more transparent timbre; versus AFUL Performer P5+2/P7 it trades that set’s wider stage and vocal presence for better overall naturalness. Pricier options can still win on preference: Softears Volume S brings more addictive mid-bass physicality and forward vocals; HiSenior Mega5EST nails the low-contrast, open midrange (though with softer bass); and Moondrop × Crinacle Dusk remains more vocal-centric with greater lateral openness. Verdict: a solid 4/5 and likely the pick at its price—slightly V-tinged, expertly executed, and a very promising first step for CrinEar.
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube ChannelCrinear Meta reviewed by Smirk Audio
7.1
Reviewer Score
Crinear Meta reviewed by Z-Reviews
7
* score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary
CrinEar Meta lands as a limited-run, $250 bass-tilted collab that’s already sold out—and feels like a “little baby bass monster” in the best way. Build is clean and understated: aluminum shells with rose-gold accents, a nice interchangeable cable, and an overbuilt hard case that embarrasses most sets at this price. The nozzles are chunky (think Chronicle’s Red/Daybreak vibes), so foam or “render”-style tips help with seal and comfort. Specs are oddly opaque—driver configuration isn’t listed anywhere—yet the package still screams more value than expected.
Tonally this is unapologetically V-shaped: elevated bass that punches on cue, crisp treble that reaches in and gets attention, and a clear midrange that can read V because the ends are lively. The stage is intimate/narrow, giving a “small loud room” energy that’s exciting but can trend fatiguing over long sessions. Crucially, it passes the body-movement test—put on a groove and there’s immediate “wiggly-wigglies”—where a safer, cleaner sibling like Daybreak can feel a bit too polite. Meta sounds less filtered, more gusto, more fun; Daybreak is the seat-belted version.
Chain matters: with spatial enhancement (think soundstage wideners on a fancy DAC), the main gripes fade and the presentation breathes, though even stock the tuning remains engaging and lively. Net take: this is the version of Daybreak many wish existed—more out of the box, more toe-tapping—so it gets the nod on sheer enjoyment. New? It was a steal at $250. Used around $200? No-brainer collector keep if that energetic, bass-forward V is the target.
Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Crinear Meta reviewed by Audionotions
7
Reviewer Score
MYER SL224 (more reviews)
MYER SL224 reviewed by Jaytiss
8.4
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
MYER SL224 reviewed by Kois Archive
8
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
The MYER SL224 is a stylish tribrid (2DD + 2BA + 4 microplanars) coming in around $270, shipped with a decent 4-core cable featuring 3.5 / 4.4 / USB-C interchangeable plugs, a zipper case, and three ear-tip sets (regular silicone, SpinFit-style silicone, foam). Build is eye-catching thanks to a real mother-of-pearl faceplate; the shell is on the larger side with a universal-custom shape that sits comfortably for long sessions, though smaller ears should test fit first. Cable behavior is mostly cooperative (functional chin slider, slight memory), and overall accessories feel thoughtful for the price.
Tonally, SL224 targets a clean, clinical presentation: sub-bass carries the weight while mid-bass stays nearer to neutral, which can read a touch lean unless paired with a warmer source (tube or similar) to add body. The midrange tracks neutral until the upper-mid / lower-treble rise, boosting female vocal harmonics and air; some may find this area forward, yet it avoids the usual micro-planar harshness. Treble is well-extended and energetic, if not the smoothest—there’s a hint of disconnect around the pinna gain—but this nit shows mainly against sets two to three times the price. Technical chops are a highlight: resolution rivals class standouts (think AFUL P7 territory), imaging is tidy, stage is fairly wide, and it earns a strong nod for competitive gaming.
Against peers, CK2V hits harder down low but dips mid-bass and feels less even up top; AFUL P7 is more balanced yet less flattering to female vocals and trickier in treble; “Dusk” (DSP) delivers better bass and a warmer tilt; “Brain Dance” is flashier but far sharper; Moondrop Meteor tracks a similar tonality with smoother highs and a mid-centric lean—an easy upgrade path if this signature clicks. Recommendation is clear: pick SL224 for a mid/treble-focused set with standout detail and clarity; skip it if sensitive to upper-mid energy or chasing a warm, bass-rich tuning. For value, this feels underrated and distinct in a meta-heavy market, earning a solid three-star recommendation.
Kois Archive Youtube Channel
MYER SL224 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel
6.5
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
Packaging overdelivers: a modular cable with 3.5/4.4/USB-C and an included dongle that gets loud enough, seven pairs of silicone tips plus foam, and a small zip case (nice but tight). The shell looks premium with a depth-effect faceplate and a metal nozzle (≈6.1 mm lip); fit is snug though potentially big for smaller ears. Build and accessories feel thoughtful at the price, with only a slightly rubbery cable texture to nitpick.
Tuning is a smooth, vocal-focused, meta-inspired balance: refined mids, a friendly yet detailed top end, and a clean, controlled low end. Bass quality is textured and separated but intentionally polite—not for hip-hop/EDM impact chasers. The midrange brings clear, natural tone without shout; both male and female vocals sit forward. The treble is the star: highly resolving, airy, and surprisingly non-fatiguing for the four micro-planars, avoiding metallic glare while adding tasteful sparkle.
Technically, separation and resolution impress, with a mild cohesiveness quirk where the treble detail outshines bass/mids. Versus peers: CK2V is more V-shaped and brighter-hot; SL224 sounds more natural. Moondrop Meteor offers smoother treble and mid timbre, but SL224’s bass quality and value punch back. Dunu Brain Dance is technically stronger; SL224 wins on tonality. SoftEars Studio 4 remains more lifelike/cohesive; SL224 brings more air and fun. AFUL Performer 7 is the better all-rounder; SL224 is for lighter-bass, vocal clarity. Kiwi Ears Astral is airier/more micro-detailed; SL224 plays it safer up top with more forward vocals. Recommendation: vocal lovers and treble-sensitive listeners wanting detail without sting. Not for bassheads or warm-tilted tastes. Final verdict: a confident 4/5 and the most compelling Myer release so far.
Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube ChannelMYER SL224 reviewed by Web Search
7.5
Reviewer Score
The MYER SLIIVO SL224 is an eight-driver hybrid built around 2DD+2BA+4 micro-planar units with a 36 Ω impedance and 108 dB sensitivity, positioned at an MSRP around $269.99 (often on sale near $230). This configuration, including 10 mm and 6 mm dynamic drivers, suggests an intent toward a clean, extended response rather than a bass-dominant tuning. Specs & pricing: 2DD+2BA+4 micro-planar, 10 mm + 6 mm DD, swappable 3.5/4.4/Type-C cable, sale price ~$229.49, regular $269.99.
Subjective reports converge on a balanced/neutral tonality with energetic yet controlled low end from the dual-DD array, lively mids, and an airy but not piercing treble. Mobileaudiophile characterizes bass as fast and powerful with engaging mids and treble, yielding a coherent, never-boring balance; this aligns with the SL224’s technical focus rather than coloration. Tonality & balance references: balanced tuning, lively mids, airy treble; bass praised for speed and control.
Technical impressions emphasize dynamics, detail retrieval, and cleanliness, with community notes calling out tight, quick mid-bass and respectable separation; limitations include occasional midrange forwardness that can mask other bands on some tracks and a stage that reads more precise than expansive. These traits point to strong value in the ~$230 bracket for listeners prioritizing clarity and midrange presence over sheer sub-bass weight. Community impressions & caveats: tight mid-bass, good dynamics; mids can get a bit forward depending on material.
Crinear Meta Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: CrinEar Top CrinEar IEMs
Price (Msrp): $250
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
MYER SL224 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA+4Micro-Planar
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $269.99
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Crinear Meta User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
MYER SL224 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Crinear Meta Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.5Gaming Grade
AMYER SL224 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.6Gaming Grade
ACrinear Meta Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- It presents a smooth, well-integrated tonal balance that plays nicely with many styles. It maintains natural timbre across the range.
Average Technical Grade
A- Overall technical control is strong, presenting instruments with clarity and sensible staging. Textures are portrayed with satisfying clarity.
MYER SL224 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.
Average Technical Grade
A- Technical performance is solid, offering clear separation and consistent detail retrieval. There's enough space for instruments to breathe.
Crinear Meta User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewMYER SL224 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFind your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS