Crinear Meta VS Simgot ET142
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Crinear Meta and Simgot ET142 use 1DD+2BA and 1Planar+1BC driver setups respectively. Crinear Meta costs $250 while Simgot ET142 costs $220. Crinear Meta is $30 more expensive. Simgot ET142 holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.3 vs 7.4). Simgot ET142 carries a user score of 7.3.
Insights
| Metric | Crinear Meta | Simgot ET142 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 7 | 7.4 |
| Mids | 7.5 | 7.4 |
| Treble | 7.5 | 7.4 |
| Details | 7 | 7.4 |
| Imaging | 7 | 7.4 |
| Dynamics | 7 | 7.4 |
| Tonality | 7.7 | 7.5 |
| Technicalities | 7.5 | 8 |
Crinear Meta Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.3Generally Favorable
Simgot ET142 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.4Generally Favorable
Reviews Comparison
Crinear Meta reviewed by Jays Audio
7.5
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
CrinEar Meta lands as a clean, balanced, slightly bright-leaning all-rounder with a distinctly sparkly treble. The top end carries a “special sauce” — sharp attack, quick decay, airy cymbal splash and strong micro-detail — creating an open sense of space with tidy separation and layering at around mid-volume (~65 dB). Bass and vocals sit at a “normal” distance: clear and resolving but not emphasized; expect punch rather than deep sub-bass rumble or chesty slam. Fit is tip-dependent: stock silicones can sound peaky; clear soft EPZ tips keep the shimmer without harshness, while “white” Tongu Senai tips smooth the treble further.
Technically, Meta punches above its $250 bracket, hanging with sets like Dusk 3.5 and Estrella for resolution and imaging despite not using ESTs. Timbre stays natural and the build/accessories feel solid. Trade-offs appear when cranking volume: the treble rise can turn fatiguing past ~75–80 dB, especially on bright, electronic-leaning tracks. Genre picks lean toward pop, J-/K-pop, rock, metal, and indie instrumentals at mid-volumes, where the upper-mid cut reins in hot mixes and the sparkle makes cymbals addictive; for hip-hop/rap/EDM, some will want more rumble, slam, and note weight.
Versus Ziigaat Estrella, it’s apples to oranges: Estrella brings more low-end authority and smoother treble with vocals popping forward, while Meta counters with a brighter, sparklier presentation better for K-/J-pop and bands. Against other bright-neutral sets (Dusk, P5+2, Brain Dance), Meta sounds fuller in the low end with a more natural, less sizzly treble; compared to Canon Pro, it’s the more energetic and less laid-back choice. For pure vocals, Volume S, EPZ P50, or Cadenza 4 remain stronger. Scaling champs like Ziigaat Odyssey and AFUL Explorer take higher volumes better but trade away some of Meta’s detail sparkle. Limited-run caveat aside, this is an easy recommendation for listeners wanting a balanced daily driver with distinct, glittery treble at sensible listening levels.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Simgot ET142 reviewed by Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
SIMGOT’s ET142 pairs a planar driver with a PZT, delivering a bright-leaning, lively all-rounder that feels like a more mature, slightly more detailed take on the original S12 tonality. Treble is the surprise: it carries bite and air without the usual planar “sizzle”, landing closer to a well-implemented PZT sheen. Micro-nuance on cymbal work is improved, vocals are open, and technical performance is among the best heard from planars in this bracket. The 2 kHz region can read a touch shy, while overall treble sits above Harman, so expect sparkle and energy rather than warmth.
Volume and fit matter. At mid levels (~60–65 dB) the ET142 sounds engaging and airy; push past ~70–75 dB and the upper energy can turn fatiguing, with forward vocals and sharper highs on busy tracks. Tip choice is critical: treble-boosting tips can be too much, whereas wide-bore, smoother tips (e.g., “Senai Wide”) keep the top end in check. Both included nozzles measure and sound essentially the same—an opportunity missed for a second, tamer tuning. Genre-wise, rock, indie and slower pop benefit from the speed and air; dense electronic can edge bright, while K-/J-pop stays bouncy at moderate volume.
Bass is quick, punchy and clean with tight decay and excellent separation—don’t expect DD-level rumble or lingering reverb, but do expect balance and definition. Versus safer, more relaxed tunings (S8/S15/S12 2024), the ET142 is the more exciting pick; against neutral all-rounders (e.g., “Pilgrim”), it trades smoothness for air and sparkle; compared to sets like “Dusk,” it’s livelier with less treble fizzle but a more forward top end. At around $200, build is excellent (metal shells, braided cable) and the value strong—competing with some $300–$400 options. In short: choose ET142 for a bright, technical, energetic listen; skip it if a laid-back or dark tilt is the goal.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Buy Simgot ET142 on Linsoul
Ad
Price: $219.99
Buy Simgot ET142 on Linsoul
Crinear Meta reviewed by Z-Reviews
7
* score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary
CrinEar Meta lands as a limited-run, $250 bass-tilted collab that’s already sold out—and feels like a “little baby bass monster” in the best way. Build is clean and understated: aluminum shells with rose-gold accents, a nice interchangeable cable, and an overbuilt hard case that embarrasses most sets at this price. The nozzles are chunky (think Chronicle’s Red/Daybreak vibes), so foam or “render”-style tips help with seal and comfort. Specs are oddly opaque—driver configuration isn’t listed anywhere—yet the package still screams more value than expected.
Tonally this is unapologetically V-shaped: elevated bass that punches on cue, crisp treble that reaches in and gets attention, and a clear midrange that can read V because the ends are lively. The stage is intimate/narrow, giving a “small loud room” energy that’s exciting but can trend fatiguing over long sessions. Crucially, it passes the body-movement test—put on a groove and there’s immediate “wiggly-wigglies”—where a safer, cleaner sibling like Daybreak can feel a bit too polite. Meta sounds less filtered, more gusto, more fun; Daybreak is the seat-belted version.
Chain matters: with spatial enhancement (think soundstage wideners on a fancy DAC), the main gripes fade and the presentation breathes, though even stock the tuning remains engaging and lively. Net take: this is the version of Daybreak many wish existed—more out of the box, more toe-tapping—so it gets the nod on sheer enjoyment. New? It was a steal at $250. Used around $200? No-brainer collector keep if that energetic, bass-forward V is the target.
Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Simgot ET142 reviewed by Z-Reviews
6.8
* score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary
SIMGOT ET142 comes across as a sleek, chrome-heavy hybrid with a planar + PZT setup, dressed in CNC’d stainless shells and a surprisingly thick premium cable, plus a magnetic case and swappable 4.4/3.5 plug. Two tuning nozzles are included; differences are subtle, but the gold nozzles give a warmer, more relaxed balance versus the blued “airier” set. At a listed ~$220, the build and accessories feel upscale, though that cable is borderline overkill for an IEM.
On power, the ET142’s 14 Ω load behaves better with a more linear solid-state source (e.g., JDS Labs Element) than with tubes; an impedance adapter can tame noise. The tuning reads smooth, non-aggressive, with bass present but not the star; sub-bass “slam” isn’t the focus, yet vocals and staging are clean and pleasing. Treble with the gold nozzles stays polite, while the blued set adds some sparkle without turning harsh.
The special sauce is the imaging: sound feels “inside” and slightly behind the head, creating a quirky but engaging sense of placement that should be excellent for gaming. Overall it fits neatly among planar hybrids at this price—refined, smooth, and easy to enjoy rather than a fireworks show—earning a straightforward recommendation, especially for SIMGOT fans who value comfort, build, and that distinctive spatial presentation over brute-force bass.
Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Crinear Meta (more reviews)
Crinear Meta reviewed by Super* Review
8*
* score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary
CrinEar Project Meta lands as a genuinely significant release: a new brand from Crinacle at an aggressive $250, limited to a small run, with a compact metal shell that fits securely and comfortably. Accessories are sensible (two eartip sets, chunky but protective case), while the swappable termination cable looks great in black/copper yet feels too long and relies on a friction fit that can be cumbersome and a bit kink-prone. Logos are plain, but overall build and ergonomics impress; a slightly shorter tip can improve seal and sound.
Tuning targets the tilted diffuse-field “Meta” profile: essentially neutral from the mids up, coupled with a deliberate, mostly sub-bass boost. The result is more contrasty than many peers—dense low end plus a touch of upper-treble sparkle—without turning sharp or sibilant. Bass is the standout: tighter and more textured than typical “new-meta” sets, though still a hair elevated and capable of sounding heavy on bass-laden tracks. Vocals sit a bit relaxed rather than forward; timbre is excellent, imaging is incisive, and the stage favors depth over width. Tip rolling (slightly shorter or attenuating tips) can tame the sparkle and lock in the balance.
Against rivals, Meta consistently punches up: it edges EPZ P50 and Kiwi Ears K4 with cleaner bass and more transparent timbre; versus AFUL Performer P5+2/P7 it trades that set’s wider stage and vocal presence for better overall naturalness. Pricier options can still win on preference: Softears Volume S brings more addictive mid-bass physicality and forward vocals; HiSenior Mega5EST nails the low-contrast, open midrange (though with softer bass); and Moondrop × Crinacle Dusk remains more vocal-centric with greater lateral openness. Verdict: a solid 4/5 and likely the pick at its price—slightly V-tinged, expertly executed, and a very promising first step for CrinEar.
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube ChannelCrinear Meta reviewed by Smirk Audio
7.1
Reviewer Score
Crinear Meta reviewed by Audionotions
7
Reviewer Score
Simgot ET142 (more reviews)
Simgot ET142 reviewed by Audio Amigo
8.5
* score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary
The Simgot ET142 is a $220 planar–piezo hybrid that arrives like a mini system: full-metal shells, the chunky but well-behaved LC7 modular cable (3.5/4.4 included), a sturdy magnetic case, and four tuning nozzles (titanium stock, gold, short black foam, short red foam). Build is solid and venting prevents pressure issues; finish is a fingerprint magnet and the shell+cable combo is heavy, comfortable for average ears but failing the “tiny ears” test in stock form. Accessory spread is excellent at the price, with multiple tip sets and spare O-rings/foams rounding out a thoughtful package.
Sonically, this is textbook planar bass: clean sub-bass rumble with punchy, textured mid-bass that doesn’t bleed. The midrange stays clear and unmasked, presenting busy mixes with ease, while vocal presence shifts with nozzle choice (short nozzles push fundamentals slightly forward). Treble is where the nozzles matter most: short red = relaxed and smooth; short black = balanced sparkle; titanium/gold = vivid, edging toward “hot” for treble-sensitive listeners. Technical chops impress—crisp microdetail from the PZT without harshness, precise imaging, strong separation, and a notably 3D soundstage. It’s also very easy to drive, playing happily from modest sources.
Think of ET142 as a three-in-one planar: titanium delivers a bright, energetic V-shape (S12/“classic planar” territory), short black dials it to a balanced, less aggressive profile (S12 Pro/2024 vibe), and short red shifts into the modern warm planar lane (akin to S15/S08). Compared with other nozzle-swap sets (e.g., Timeless 2), ET142 offers a wider tuning range up top, trading fine micro-timbre tweaks for genuinely distinct signatures. Caveats: none of the nozzles are truly neutral and the low end stays boosted, so lean-bass seekers should look elsewhere; the weight may be a deal-breaker for small ears. For anyone wanting a versatile planar that can swing from sparkly and fun to warm and relaxing with a quick nozzle swap, this earns a confident “you should buy this” recommendation on value and flexibility alone.
Audio Amigo Youtube Channel
Simgot ET142 reviewed by
Fresh Reviews
6.5*
* The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming
Score
Youtube Video Summary
Build & accessories: ET142 arrives with an all-metal chassis, a tidy two-pin cable with interchangeable termination, and swappable nozzles (blue default vs. gold). The blue nozzle proves smoother, as the gold adds extra 2–3 kHz energy that can edge into shout. Ergonomics are compact, vented, and well-finished, though not as feather-light as some resin competitors.
Tuning & technicals: The hybrid architecture (planar plus bone-conduction) projects an expansive, airy stage with clean separation and layering. However, that upper-mid peak can make gunfire and busy mixes feel a bit spicy, leading to a “deer-in-headlights” sensation during chaotic moments. Tonally it’s clear and detailed, but the extra air sometimes pushes nearfield cues slightly forward in the stage instead of delivering immediate urgency.
Gaming performance: Imaging and verticality are solid and footstep cues are intelligible, placing ET142 in a B+ to B range for competitive play. Against a warmer rival with stronger low-end presence, ET142 is less fatiguing than the gold-nozzle setup but still brighter than ideal for Apex/Valorant chaos; the rival’s bass weighting keeps gunfire tamed and localization snappier. Overall, ET142 is good for gaming with strong separation and stage, best for players who value clarity and air over maximum urgency.
Fresh Reviews original ranking
Fresh Reviews Youtube ChannelCrinear Meta Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: CrinEar Top CrinEar IEMs
Price (Msrp): $250
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Simgot ET142 Details
Driver Configuration: 1Planar+1BC
Tuning Type: V-Shaped
Brand: Simgot Top Simgot IEMs
Price (Msrp): $220
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Crinear Meta User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Simgot ET142 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score:
Based on 1 user reviews
7.3Generally Favorable
Crinear Meta Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.5Gaming Grade
ASimgot ET142 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
8.1Gaming Grade
A+Crinear Meta Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- It presents a smooth, well-integrated tonal balance that plays nicely with many styles. It maintains natural timbre across the range.
Average Technical Grade
A- Overall technical control is strong, presenting instruments with clarity and sensible staging. Textures are portrayed with satisfying clarity.
Simgot ET142 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.
Average Technical Grade
A+- A very capable technical display delivers articulate layers and poised imaging. It portrays reverbs and echoes with confidence.
Crinear Meta User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewSimgot ET142 User Reviews
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewThe Simgot ET142 delivers a smooth and natural sound signature with strong mids but lacks impact in the bass region.
Pros
Clear and detailed mids with good instrument separation; solid build quality and comfortable fit.Cons
Bass can feel a bit light for bassheads; soundstage is average and not very wide.Find your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS