EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai VS Moondrop Chu II

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai and Moondrop Chu II are in-ear monitors. EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai costs $20 while Moondrop Chu II costs $19. EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai is $1 more expensive. Moondrop Chu II holds a decisive 4-point edge in reviewer scores (1.5 vs 5.5).

EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai Aggregated Review Score

EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

1.5

Abysmal


Moondrop Chu II Aggregated Review Score

Moondrop Chu II Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio
Gizaudio Axel
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed


EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai User Review Score

EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Moondrop Chu II User Review Score

Moondrop Chu II Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.9

Gaming Grade

E

Moondrop Chu II Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.4

Gaming Grade

C+

EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids E-
Midrange is extremely recessed and muddy. Critical vocal frequencies are buried, making lyrics hard to discern.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage E-
Extremely narrow and flat presentation. All elements sound congested in the center of your head with no instrument placement.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Moondrop Chu II Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai Reviews

EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai reviewed by:

2025-08-28
Jaytiss 1.5 Reviewer Score
E Tuning
E+ Tech
This is basically unlistenable. Requires EQ, but is fine with it.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: E- Treble: E+ Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: E-

EarAcoustic Audio x Zkaaai User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!

Moondrop Chu II User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer