EPZ 530 VS FatFreq Scarlet Mini

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

EPZ 530 and FatFreq Scarlet Mini use 5BA and 1DD+2BA driver setups respectively. EPZ 530 costs $700 while FatFreq Scarlet Mini costs $800. FatFreq Scarlet Mini is $100 more expensive. EPZ 530 holds a decisive 1.2-point edge in reviewer scores (8 vs 6.7). EPZ 530 has better mids with a 0.5-point edge, EPZ 530 has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, EPZ 530 has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and EPZ 530 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric EPZ 530 FatFreq Scarlet Mini
Bass 8 7.5
Mids 6 5.5
Treble 7 6
Details 8 7
Soundstage 8 7
Imaging 8 6.5
Dynamics 7 6
Tonality 7.5 6.5
Technicalities 7.5 6.1
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough EPZ 530 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

EPZ 530 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio
Z-Reviews Jaytiss Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

8

Strongly Favorable


FatFreq Scarlet Mini Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Jays Audio
Smirk Audio Audionotions Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

6.7

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

FatFreq Scarlet Mini reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Ohh this set is a special love affair with BASS. Not Neutral lol.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

EPZ 530 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Great set for jazz/blues/soul/acoustic. Thick and lush. Warm but with nice treble extension. Solid tech. Vocals can be overly husky and buried in busier songs.
Youtube Video Summary

EPZ 530 comes across as a warm-tilted set with elevated mid-bass that adds body and texture, yet keeps a sharp, airy treble for bite. Compared with ultra-aggressive sets like Gaea, the upper mids are less intense and overall fatigue is lower, while resolution sits a notch down—closer to EJ07M territory than true kilobuck flagships. The tuning makes jazz, blues, and instrumental tracks shine: bass is meaty, timing feels lively, and cymbals have enough sparkle to stay engaging without turning harsh.

Trade-offs show up with vocals: extra mid-bass plus a ~1.5 kHz dip/masking can make voices sound husky, less open, and a bit veiled in busier mixes; for clearer, airier vocals, sets like OG Oracle, EJ07M, Variations, or Studio 4S still take the lead. The stage is intimate to average, slightly smaller than Gaea, but coherent and focused. As a warm, non-Harman/DF alternative that still offers treble extension and air, 530 is a distinctive pick—helped by a gorgeous amber colorway, a neat wooden box presentation, and seemingly solid QC. Cables won’t transform its sound, but a well-built one adds comfort and durability; save the big spend there.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

FatFreq Scarlet Mini reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech
Crap ton of sub-bass but still very well-controlled (for the most part). No mud or mid-bass bloat, uppermids/treble are smoother than Maestro Mini, still somewhat balanced without having the low-end overtake. Vocals do distort sometimes as the sub-bass can bleed into it. Deuce better.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

EPZ 530 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.3 * score rescaled + normalized
8 community members have rated the EPZ 530 at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

FatFreq Scarlet Mini reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.9 * score rescaled + normalized
14 community members have rated the FATFreq Scarlet Mini at an average of 4.2/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

EPZ 530 (more reviews)

EPZ 530 reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

EPZ 530 delivers a distinctly warm, intimate presentation with forward vocals and a close, enveloping stage that can feel like a gentle heat lamp over the mix. It’s a 5BA set tuned for body and energy rather than forensic micro-detail, with a slight low-end bump that rides smoothly into the lower mids and treble that’s “just enough” to avoid dullness. Tip and amp choices matter: with Render/DUNU-style tips and especially a tube amp, the stage opens up and the tonality gains sparkle, turning the 530 into a bit of a chameleon across sources while keeping that baritone-rich core.

Build is eye-catching with wood shells in mossy green and gold accents, plus a braided 3-in-1 cable advertised as gold/silver/copper with a palladium alloy. The aesthetic pops, but there are quibbles: hints of wood splintering on the box, a clear-bead chin slider that feels out of place at this tier, and a lean accessory pack (limited tips, no foams, modest case). Marketing copy still says “moving iron” for balanced armatures, which doesn’t inspire confidence.

Value is the sticking point. The blind estimate pegged it around $420–$550 based on sound; retail shows $700–$745, which feels ambitious for EPZ as a brand and for what’s in the box. Sonically, though, the set is clean, engaging, and excellent on tubes, earning an 8/10 for sound quality. At full MSRP, expect to debate the extras; at around $500 on sale, it becomes an easy recommendation for listeners craving warmth, intimate vocals, and source-tunable character over analytical precision.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

FatFreq Scarlet Mini (more reviews)

FatFreq Scarlet Mini reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Details: A- Imaging: B+

FatFreq Scarlet Mini reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 7 Reviewer Score
Holy Bass! Unabashedly colored listen with heathenistic amounts of bass elevation and physicality. Man does this thing punch. Vocals and instruments can sound subdued a little bit unless you turn the volume up a bit which pushes the bass into guilty pleasure territory and beyond. You have to love bass but if you do, you'll love this set. Good details. Good separation. Timbre is pretty good for most instruments. Treble can be a bit unnatural but not offensively so. It's not for everyone, but bassheads will be hardpressed to find anything better without breaking the bank (even more).

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

EPZ 530 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FatFreq Scarlet Mini User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EPZ 530 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

FatFreq Scarlet Mini Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.7

Gaming Grade

B-

EPZ 530 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • The response is even and composed, lending itself to effortless genre hopping. Voices sit comfortably in the mix.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • You get a well-rounded technical package that keeps separation, detail, and staging in harmony. It's a solid middle ground between fun and fidelity.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics A-
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage A+
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

FatFreq Scarlet Mini Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • It sounds pleasant overall, with some uneven spots that hint at room for refinement. Vocals remain pleasant despite the imperfections.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass A
You get robust low-end authority that remains disciplined and textured. Layering stays intact despite the weight.
Mids B-
The region sounds agreeable overall, delivering clarity without flashiness. Slight warmth keeps things easy-going.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics B
It handles shifts in volume well, keeping transients lively and controlled. Quiet-to-loud transitions feel natural.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation that is wide, deep, and tall with precise instrument placement. Width, depth, and height all feel expanded.
Details A-
Low-level information blossoms, presenting a rich tapestry of articulate sound. Analytical listeners will be delighted.
Imaging B+
Instrument boundaries feel well carved, avoiding smear or drift. Instrument outlines feel well-defined.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

EPZ 530 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

FatFreq Scarlet Mini User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer