EPZ P50 VS Ziigaat Lush

Youtube Video Summary

EPZ P50 comes as a tribrid at $185 with a surprisingly complete kit: a sturdy leatherette case, modular 3.5/4.4mm terminations, three silicone tip sets, and a cleaning cloth. The resin shells are semi-custom with aluminum faceplates; comfort is generally good but anatomy-dependent, and the stock cable—while well finished—runs on the stiff side. A standout twist is the factory customization option (~$225 total for the “Grindphones” style), which notably doesn’t alter the tuning in any meaningful way. The set is easy to drive, shows minimal change with impedance adapters (a touch warmer/more vocal-forward), and avoids pressure issues thanks to smart internal venting.

Sonically, tuning sits as a controlled, mild V: bass is just north of neutral with pleasing texture and impact, mids stay clean with an engaging female-vocal emphasis, and treble adds airy sparkle without turning tizzy—though insertion depth can trigger length-mode variability for some ears. Technical chops impress at the price: detail retrieval punches up, imaging is precise with good separation, and stage reads average but coherent. Against peers, P50 feels more resolving than Kiwi Ears K4 (trades bigger bass/sparkle for better mid clarity), brighter and more vocal-present than the neutral-leaning Ziigaat Lush, and echoes a Dunu Da Vinci vibe with less bass. Verdict: tremendous value and a terrific pick for vocal-centric libraries—highly recommended to audition first if treble sensitivity or fit quirks are a concern.

Youtube Video Summary

EPZ’s P50 feels like a breakout for the brand: a compact, medium-small shell with a vented faceplate that’s marketed as “open-back,” yet isolates like a typical IEM. The unboxing is tidy at this price—carry puck, a real microfiber cloth, and two sets of generic tips—while the modular cable (screw-lock swappable termination) is handy if a bit thin, stiff, and kink-prone; the 2-pin plug sits slightly proud of the socket and the “R” marking is visible on the outside. The long nozzle (~5.5 mm diameter) can push fit depth, so shorter tips (e.g., NF Audio-style) help; once set, stability and comfort are excellent. Overall build looks clean and modern, if a touch editorial compared with EPZ’s other shells.

Sonically, P50 embraces the current tilted diffuse-field “new meta” with a mostly neutral, natural presentation and a later-rising, sub-bass-centric lift that gives bounce rather than mid-bass thump. There’s a hint of extra presence around the 4–5 kHz region that adds macro-contrast—vocals pop with definition and separation is crisp—while upper treble stays safe: cymbals are clean but a bit light in weight. Bass is tight and incisive rather than slammy; micro-texture on vocals is good, though the set favors that big, “stagey” contrast over ultra-fine grain. It’s easily EPZ’s best tuning so far: clear, organized, and engaging without drifting from neutral-ish aims.

Against peers, Kiwi Ears K4 tracks a similar target but sounds lower-contrast and can blur on dense mixes; P50 hits harder on transients, images more cleanly, and keeps busy tracks sorted, while K4 offers a richer midrange with “frothier” treble. Versus the Binary Chopin, Chopin is warmer, fuller, and more mid-bass driven—more “analog” and atmospheric—with deeper perceived space but a bulkier fit; P50 is leaner, clearer, and the least bass-forward of the three. Verdict: a confident 4/5 for delivering a small, comfy fit and a clean, contrasty neutral that competes squarely around $200–$250. If the brief is “neutral with a bit of drama,” this is a strong pick—and a promising sign of where EPZ can go next.

Youtube Video Summary

Ziigaat Lush lands at $180 with a hybrid 1DD + 4BA setup and the brand’s familiar accessories: a slim case, silicone tips (S/M/L), and one foam pair. The cable is lightweight but tangly, and the all-plastic shells feel light yet a bit cheap. Fit is stable yet not ideal— the long nozzle can bottom out, tip selection becomes important, and there’s some driver flex. Aesthetics are decent, though the logo and overall build leave room for improvement.

Sonically, this is a “new meta” take: fuller lower mids, relaxed upper mids, and laid-back treble that can read a touch dark. The tonality is warm, smooth, and low-contrast; vocals sit a bit back and busy mixes can feel smoothed over. Treble avoids sharpness but can be inconsistent (sometimes blurred, sometimes a little chunky), and overall incisiveness depends heavily on tip choice. Bass isn’t overblown on the graph, yet comes across stronger in practice because the top end is subdued—impact is fine, definition is average. Imaging isn’t razor-sharp, though the stage can feel surprisingly wide.

Against peers, EPZ P50 sounds more contrasty with tighter bass, crisper treble, better imaging, and much better comfort. Kiwi Ears K4 brings more sparkle and sharper imaging (bass can dominate at times), again with superior fit. A cheaper alt, the AFUL Explorer, offers a similarly laid-back vibe with tighter bass, more consistent/airy treble, and an easier fit. Net: Lush is a pleasant, relaxed alternative for the treble-sensitive, but build and comfort hold it back. Rating: 3/5.

Youtube Video Summary

The EPZ P50 comes in hot as a new tribrid and a potential $200 neutral benchmark, trading sterile restraint for a more vocal-centric presentation. Versus the MEGA5EST, vocals sit a touch more forward—adding emotional weight and clarity—while the MEGA5EST still edges it on sheer smoothness and EST “air.” Compared to Meteor, the P50 fills in the lower mids, dials back 1–3 kHz glare, and opens the top end a bit; Meteor stays a hair softer up top. The catch is bass: the P50’s DD is competent but not a sub-bass shaker—expect clean rather than authoritative slam.

Against peers, the P50 sounds fuller and more natural than Supermix 4 (which is brighter and more “hi-fi” energetic), and it trades blows with Odyssey: Odyssey brings better bass texture and treble micro-detail, while the P50 delivers superior vocal clarity and a touch more air. It excels at mid-volume listening—Volume S needs more gain to bloom—and outclasses lighter, air-tilted sets like “K4” style tunings when male vocals or body are the priority. Accessory game is strong too: a nicer cable and a genuinely sturdy hard-leather case sweeten the deal. Not the most “unique” flavor and not for bassheads, but as a balanced, clean, vocal-forward option around $200, P50 is an easy recommendation for those chasing neutrality without the vanilla.

Youtube Video Summary

Ziigaat Lush lands as a cleaner, more airy and slightly more technical take on the Explore. The overall tuning is balanced, smooth, and full with a hint of air; vocals sit a touch laid-back in the mix with thicker male timbre, making it an easy, fatigue-free listen. At mid–low volumes it’s a relaxing, non-intrusive “background” set; turn it up and the Lush scales, opening the stage, popping vocals forward, adding extension and low-end impact. Cymbals read clear and lightly airy without sting, though snares can get a bit sharp on certain tracks and ultra-energetic genres won’t be its strong suit.

Technical gains over the Explore are real but modest—this isn’t a technical/value monster at the price. Bass quality is adequate rather than tactile: tighter and less warm than Explore with lower quantity, engaging when loud but bass-light at moderate levels, so not the first pick for sub-bass-centric hip-hop/EDM. Where it shines is at higher volumes with rock, metal, and R&B: natural timbre, good separation, and a smooth, immersive cruise rather than a high-contrast thrill ride.

Against peers, Lush sounds cleaner, more open and better balanced than Letshuoer S08; sets like Supermix 4, Nova, A30, Chopin are more resolving and lively at mid-volumes, while P50 and Cadenza 4 push vocals more forward. Treble-tilted options (Meta, ET142) are sparklier but less natural in timbre. Timeless 2 and Tanchjim Origin share the smooth/neutral vibe yet don’t scale like Lush. Versus its siblings, Odyssey is the more dynamic, V-leaning extrovert; Arcanis is a clear step up in resolution and vocal prowess. At ~$180 the cable/packaging underwhelm and it’s not a slam-dunk value, but as a smooth, immersive, volume-scaling upgrade for Explore/S08 fans, Lush hits its niche; if a chill mid-volume set is all that’s needed, cheaper options like EW300 DSP—or even Explore—make more sense.

Youtube Video Summary

The EPZ P50 arrives as a ~$200 tribrid with a slick presentation: FR graph on the box, a puck-style case, plenty of tips (oddly two identical sets), and a nice microfiber cloth. Build leans premium with a semi-open back and a faceplate that gives “arc reactor” vibes. The custom shell offers a secure fit for most, though very small ears—or anyone sensitive to an inner wing—may need caution. The modular cable (3.5/4.4 mm) is practical yet slightly stiff and retains some memory; isolation is typical of sealed IEMs despite the semi-open styling.

Sonically, the P50 goes for a warm-balanced tuning. Bass quality impresses: bouncy with deep sub-bass reach, prioritizing texture and control over sheer quantity (more thump is possible via an impedance adapter). Mids read natural with a touch of warmth—male vocals shine—while female vocals can feel a bit lean due to a more relaxed upper-mid energy. Treble is smooth, inoffensive, and “planar-clean” without planar timbre, with only a slight wish for more top-end extension.

Technical performance is the star. The micro planars pull out micro-detail unusually well for the price; imaging, separation, and overall resolution feel confidently executed, making guitars pop and busy mixes easy to parse. That clarity translates to gaming, where positional cues and crowded soundscapes (think battle royale chaos) remain intelligible—worthy of a two-controller gaming nod. Overall, the EPZ P50 is a solid contender at this price: balanced tuning with standout detail retrieval and imaging, tempered only by mids that play it a little safe. For listeners unbothered by a gentler upper-mid lift, it’s well worth the money—a two-star recommendation.

Youtube Video Summary

The Ziigaat Arcanis and Lush IEMs offer distinct flavors at their price points, both featuring resin builds with eye-catching faceplates—sparkly green for the Arcanis and silver-black for the Lush. Fit is familiar to other Ziigaat models, and accessories include a basic cable, ear tips, and carrying pouch. Sonically, the Arcanis delivers a holographic, punchy presentation with emphasized sub-bass and upper mids, making footsteps, slides, and distant gunfire pop with urgency. The Lush leans darker and smoother, relaxing upper mids to tame gunfire harshness while maintaining clean bass and excellent separation.

For gaming, performance varies by title. In Valorant and CS2, the Lush shines with precise imaging and a smoother, fatigue-free experience—gunfire feels controlled without sacrificing detail. The Arcanis excels in COD, where its aggressive tuning highlights critical cues like footsteps and slides with greater potency. However, in Apex Legends, the Lush’s relaxed profile struggles with subtle audio cues (e.g., light taps or shield cells), earning a B rating. The Arcanis fares better (B+) with superior depth reads and emphasis on environmental sounds, though complex fights can overwhelm its separation compared to top-tier sets like the Mangird Tea Pro.

Ultimately, the Arcanis is a versatile all-rounder, slightly favored for both music and most gaming scenarios. The Lush carves a niche for smooth, non-fatiguing sessions in Valorant/CS2, filling a unique spot in Ziigaat’s lineup. Both IEMs offer exceptional resolution and layering for their prices, but the choice hinges on preference: the Arcanis for its energetic clarity, or the Lush for its refined, relaxed signature.