Fatfreq Sakura VS Fatfreq Hayabusa

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Fatfreq Sakura and Fatfreq Hayabusa use 6BA and 8BA driver setups respectively. Fatfreq Sakura costs $950 while Fatfreq Hayabusa costs $1,320. Fatfreq Hayabusa is $370 more expensive. Both score 6 from reviewers.

Insights

Metric Fatfreq Sakura Fatfreq Hayabusa
Tonality 7 6.5
Technicalities 6 6

Fatfreq Sakura Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

6

Mixed to Positive


Fatfreq Hayabusa Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

6

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

Fatfreq Sakura reviewed by Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech

Fatfreq Hayabusa reviewed by Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech

Fatfreq Sakura User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Fatfreq Hayabusa User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Fatfreq Sakura Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

Fatfreq Hayabusa Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.2

Gaming Grade

C+

Fatfreq Sakura Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Fatfreq Hayabusa Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Fatfreq Sakura User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Fatfreq Hayabusa User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer