Final Audio EVA VS Binary Dynaquattro

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Final Audio EVA and Binary Dynaquattro use 1DD and 4DD driver setups respectively. Final Audio EVA costs $250 while Binary Dynaquattro costs $260. Binary Dynaquattro is $10 more expensive. Binary Dynaquattro holds a decisive 4.7-point edge in reviewer scores (2.7 vs 7.4).

Insights

Metric Final Audio EVA Binary Dynaquattro
Mids 2.7 6
Treble 2.7 6
Soundstage 2.7 7
Dynamics 2.7 8
Tonality 3 7.1
Technicalities 2 6.8

Final Audio EVA Aggregated Review Score

Final Audio EVA Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

2.7

Very Negative


Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score

Binary Dynaquattro Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews Jays Audio Jaytiss Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Final Audio EVA User Review Score

Final Audio EVA Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score

Binary Dynaquattro Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Final Audio EVA Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.3

Gaming Grade

E+

Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

Final Audio EVA Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Gaming E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Binary Dynaquattro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A+
Superb dynamic range - powerful yet nuanced. Exceptional transient response with lifelike impact and subtle volume gradations.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Final Audio EVA Reviews

Final Audio EVA reviewed by:

Precogvision 2.7 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
E+ Tech
Very bassy with poor technicalities. Sounds more like a Beats headphone than a Final Audio IEM.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision

Binary Dynaquattro Reviews

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by:

Z-Reviews 7.2 * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Binary Dynaquattro or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $194.99

Buy Binary Dynaquattro on Hifigo

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by:

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
Natural vocals, good treble extension, bass is tight and more resolving vs 61t and Davinci. Overall very well balanced and clean. There are some small peaks at 8-10k and 15-20K which can be an issue on some songs, and there is masking around 4-8k region, but overall, solid all-rounder.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by:

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It has great tuning, but lack serverly in some areas. Very fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A-

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by:

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Shines when driven properly. Excellent bass, vocal-forward tuning, and natural timbre. Hard to drive, could use more treble extension.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel

Final Audio EVA User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Binary Dynaquattro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer