Final Audio EVA and Binary Dynaquattro use 1DD and 4DD driver setups respectively. Final Audio EVA costs $250 while Binary Dynaquattro costs $260. Binary Dynaquattro is $10 more expensive. Binary Dynaquattro holds a decisive 4.7-point edge in reviewer scores (2.7 vs 7.4).
Insights
Metric | Final Audio EVA | Binary Dynaquattro |
---|---|---|
Mids | 2.7 | 6 |
Treble | 2.7 | 6 |
Soundstage | 2.7 | 7 |
Dynamics | 2.7 | 8 |
Tonality | 3 | 7.1 |
Technicalities | 2 | 6.8 |
Final Audio EVA Aggregated Review Score
Final Audio EVA Average Reviewer Scores
Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score
Binary Dynaquattro Average Reviewer Scores
Final Audio EVA Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $250
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Binary Dynaquattro Details
Driver Configuration: 4DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $260
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Final Audio EVA User Review Score
Final Audio EVA Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score
Binary Dynaquattro Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Final Audio EVA Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.3Gaming Grade
E+Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.9Gaming Grade
B+Final Audio EVA Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
E+- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Binary Dynaquattro Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A-- Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Final Audio EVA Reviews
Final Audio EVA reviewed by: Precogvision
Very bassy with poor technicalities. Sounds more like a Beats headphone than a Final Audio IEM. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Binary Dynaquattro Reviews
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Z-Reviews
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Jays Audio
Natural vocals, good treble extension, bass is tight and more resolving vs 61t and Davinci. Overall very well balanced and clean. There are some small peaks at 8-10k and 15-20K which can be an issue on some songs, and there is masking around 4-8k region, but overall, solid all-rounder. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Jaytiss
It has great tuning, but lack serverly in some areas. Very fun. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel
Shines when driven properly. Excellent bass, vocal-forward tuning, and natural timbre. Hard to drive, could use more treble extension.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
Final Audio EVA User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewBinary Dynaquattro User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review