64 Audio Tia Trio VS Flipears Aurora

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

64 Audio Tia Trio and Flipears Aurora use 1DD+2BA and 2DD+6BA+2EST driver setups respectively. 64 Audio Tia Trio costs $2,300 while Flipears Aurora costs $2,100. 64 Audio Tia Trio is $200 more expensive. 64 Audio Tia Trio holds a decisive 2.1-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 6.4). 64 Audio Tia Trio carries a user score of 7.9. 64 Audio Tia Trio has significantly better bass with a 1-point edge, Flipears Aurora has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Flipears Aurora has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and Flipears Aurora has better details with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric 64 Audio Tia Trio Flipears Aurora
Bass 10 9
Mids 7 8
Treble 7 8
Details 8 8.5
Soundstage 8.5 8
Imaging 8.5 8.5
Dynamics 9 6.4
Tonality 7.8 6.4
Technicalities 8 6.9
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Flipears Aurora reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

64 Audio Tia Trio Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin
Nymz Precogvision
Audionotions
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

8.5

Very Positive

Flipears Aurora Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin
Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive

Reviews Comparison

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Crin

Crin 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
A more correct sounding version of the Fourte with slight cutbacks in staging and sheer resolution.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Buy 64 Audio Tia Trio on audio46

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your 64 Audio Tia Trio or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,800

Buy 64 Audio Tia Trio on audio46

Flipears Aurora reviewed by Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B- Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

64 Audio Tia Trio (more reviews)

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 10* * score rescaled + normalized
YouTube video thumbnail
Youtube Video Summary

The tia Trio comes across as a hybrid with personality: rich, thick, and warm, with slightly forward treble that adds air without tipping into the harsher edge heard on the U18t. Vocals are pulled back, yet the presentation feels cohesive and surprisingly natural given its unconventional response. What really stands out is the depth and head-stage—a wraparound sense of space that feels more immersive than most peers, making guitar strums and ambient cues pop in a way that’s immediately engaging.

Despite the 1DD + 2BA configuration, bass isn’t a simple upgrade over the U12t’s BA low end; it carries a touch more body and plosive weight but can feel a bit slower and less refined. Still, detail retrieval punches well above the driver count, and the overall tuning—while relaxed in the mids—stays clean and exciting. With the usual 64 Audio caveats (no apex swapping here and a mediocre stock cable), the tia Trio earns a five-star verdict for its intoxicating stage and atmosphere, even if it’s not the safest all-rounder at its $2,300 price.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 9 Reviewer Score
Phenomenal bass texture and quality. Mids are good if not great - I don't have much to nitpick about them - good note weight and excellent clarity. Treble is very sparkly and airy though some may find it a bit too much - I think the extra spice actually helps with instruments like violins. Imaging isn't quite as precise as U12T but stage is just as large if not more so. Timbre is not exactly natural but it is very good and definitely not offensive at all. My subjective favorite IEM to date. This is without a doubt a colored listen but it is so satisfying. Makes U12T sound almost sterile. That said both are good counterpoints to each other.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 8.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Best bass texture ever. Gorgeous treble extension, stage and imaging. Coherency and timbre a bit off. Upper mids/lower treble could be better. As amazing as it is, I couldn't fully connect with it (musically). Price is the biggest con.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: S+ Mids: A- Treble: A- Details: A+ Imaging: S

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
YouTube video thumbnail
Rich bass and out-of-head imaging.
Youtube Video Summary

The tia Trio mirrors 64 Audio’s flagship DNA at a lower price point ($2,299) with the same compact, lightweight aluminum build, generous tip selection, and a comfortable shell that suits smaller ears. Sonically it carries a present but well-judged bass shelf, adding a touch of warmth by settling around ~180Hz rather than the usual sub-bass focus. Crucially, the midrange corrects the Forte’s biggest flaw: upper mids aren’t hollowed out here. There’s a mild 1.5–3k dip (about 1–2dB), yet vocals and instruments remain properly contoured and far more natural and engaging without requiring EQ.

Up top, the Trio shows recognizable treble landmarks—an emphasis near 5k that can sound a bit shouty and another at 8k adding slight sizzle—tempered by the healthier mids, so the presentation is lively without becoming harsh. Treble extension is excellent, with “air” above 10k running a tad hot depending on taste. On technicalities, detail retrieval and image clarity track surprisingly close to both the Forte and Legend Evo; the soundstage is expansive for an IEM (strong depth and layering) though not as outsized as Forte, and imaging is accurate for music but not surgical enough for competitive FPS. Taken as a whole—and especially without EQ—the tia Trio feels like the more complete listen: a high-end IEM that preserves the fun while fixing the midrange, trading only a slice of stage grandeur for a much more balanced, recommendable experience.

Bass: S+ Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: S Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Flipears Aurora (more reviews)

Flipears Aurora reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 8.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Bass hits with real subwoofer qualities, generally balanced sounding with no real faults Extremely difficult to obtain

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: S Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S-

64 Audio Tia Trio User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7.9

Strongly Favorable

Flipears Aurora User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Tia Trio Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.4

Gaming Grade

B

Flipears Aurora Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

64 Audio Tia Trio Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • It sounds refined and controlled, keeping instruments neatly separated with immersive staging. Busy arrangements remain neatly organized.
Bass S+
The bass is breathtaking, pairing thunderous impact with absolute precision. Every rumble is rendered with realism.
Mids A-
The mids sound lush and articulate, capturing emotion effortlessly. Strings and keys shimmer with realism.
Treble A-
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics S
This is reference-grade dynamic performance with breathtaking realism. It mirrors live-music intensity perfectly.
Details A+
No subtlety is too small; the presentation exposes it all with composure. Complex tracks remain crystal clear.
Imaging S-
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision that creates a palpable sense of placement. It creates a near-holographic placement.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Flipears Aurora Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Bass S
You get a reference-grade low end that feels powerful, deep, and effortlessly clean. The low-end foundation sounds studio-grade.
Mids A+
The midrange sounds refined and revealing, balancing clarity with emotional weight. Timbre accuracy rivals studio monitors.
Treble A+
It delivers superb treble brilliance that stays pure even in complex passages. It adds excitement while staying pure.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging that lets instruments float naturally around you. It paints a holographic bubble around you.
Details S-
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers while maintaining natural timbre. It uncovers hidden layers with ease.
Imaging S-
Instruments feel carved into space with unwavering positional stability. Instruments occupy palpable coordinates.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio Tia Trio User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
W wpzdm
7.9

U12t with more techs. Its short nozzles require pushing tips as far down as possible so nozzles insert deeply into ear canals, achieving the famed bass texture; but then, female vocals become a bit harsh.

Pros
Bass energy. Treble extension.
Cons
Both bass and treble kinda "plastic" and not very refined, tho not as so as s12; may be due to the too thick/large image.

Flipears Aurora User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer