Heartfield CU8 VS Binary Dynaquattro
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Heartfield CU8 and Binary Dynaquattro use 4BA and 4DD driver setups respectively. Heartfield CU8 costs $279 while Binary Dynaquattro costs $260. Heartfield CU8 is $19 more expensive. Binary Dynaquattro holds a clear 0.7-point edge in reviewer scores (6.7 vs 7.4). Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Heartfield CU8 | Binary Dynaquattro |
|---|---|---|
| Mids | 5 | 6 |
| Treble | 6 | 6 |
| Soundstage | 6 | 7 |
| Dynamics | 7 | 8 |
| Gaming capabilities | 6.7 | 6.9 |
Heartfield CU8 Aggregated Review Score
Heartfield CU8 Average Reviewer Scores
Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score
Binary Dynaquattro Average Reviewer Scores
Heartfield CU8 Details
Driver Configuration: 4BA
Tuning Type: harman
Price (Msrp): $279
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Binary Dynaquattro Details
Driver Configuration: 4DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $260
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Heartfield CU8 User Review Score
Heartfield CU8 Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score
Binary Dynaquattro Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Heartfield CU8 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.7Gaming Grade
B+Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.9Gaming Grade
B+Heartfield CU8 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Binary Dynaquattro Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A-- Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Heartfield CU8 Reviews
Heartfield CU8 reviewed by: Jays Audio
2025-07-16
6
Reviewer Score
Warmer Harman 2019 with less shouty vocals. Bassy all-rounder with decent tech. Build and plate design is very pretty... but price is a bit high and not that competitive - wait for sale unless you really dig the look. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Heartfield CU8 reviewed by: Jaytiss
2025-07-10
7
Reviewer Score
It's fine, but is fine worth your purchase? Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Heartfield CU8 reviewed by: IEMRanking AI
2025-08-30
7.1
Reviewer Score
The Heartfield CU8 delivers a neutral sound that closely follows the Harman target curve, providing a balanced and accurate listening experience suitable for both critical monitoring and musical enjoyment. Its bass response is tight and textured, with a slight mid-bass bump that adds a touch of warmth without bleeding into the mids, while the treble remains smooth and free of sibilance.
Build quality is a standout, featuring a hand-finished brass chamber that feels premium but contributes to a heavier design, which might affect fit for some users during extended wear. The included cable is thin relative to the IEM's weight, though the deep recessed 2-pin connectors ensure a secure connection.
Overall, the CU8 excels with a natural timbre and cohesive presentation, making it a strong choice for those seeking an analytical yet engaging signature across genres, though its weight and sparse accessories are minor drawbacks. The PUR vibration control system effectively enhances dynamics, allowing its four balanced armatures to perform with the impact of more complex driver setups.
Binary Dynaquattro Reviews
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Z-Reviews
7.2
* score normalized
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
Natural vocals, good treble extension, bass is tight and more resolving vs 61t and Davinci. Overall very well balanced and clean. There are some small peaks at 8-10k and 15-20K which can be an issue on some songs, and there is masking around 4-8k region, but overall, solid all-rounder. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Jaytiss
7.8
Reviewer Score
It has great tuning, but lack serverly in some areas. Very fun. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel
7.5
Reviewer Score
Shines when driven properly. Excellent bass, vocal-forward tuning, and natural timbre. Hard to drive, could use more treble extension.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
Heartfield CU8 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewBinary Dynaquattro User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review