Hidition Viento VS 64 Audio U4S

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Hidition Viento and 64 Audio U4S use 4BA and 1DD+3BA driver setups respectively. Hidition Viento costs $950 while 64 Audio U4S costs $1,100. 64 Audio U4S is $150 more expensive. 64 Audio U4S holds a slight 0.3-point edge in reviewer scores (7.9 vs 8.1). 64 Audio U4S has significantly better bass with a 1.5-point edge, 64 Audio U4S has significantly better mids with a 1.2-point edge, 64 Audio U4S has slightly better treble with a 0.4-point edge, 64 Audio U4S has better dynamics with a 0.5-point edge, Hidition Viento has better soundstage with a 0.6-point edge and 64 Audio U4S has better imaging with a 0.9-point edge.

Insights

Metric Hidition Viento 64 Audio U4S
Bass 6.5 8
Mids 6.6 7.8
Treble 6.4 6.8
Details 7.1 7.3
Soundstage 6.6 6
Imaging 6.6 7.5
Dynamics 7.2 7.7
Tonality 8.5 7.4
Technicalities 7.6 7
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Hidition Viento reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Hidition Viento Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.9

Strongly Favorable


64 Audio U4S Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.1

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

Hidition Viento reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 6.6 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech
Reference-lean tuning with strong upper mids and mid-treble; superb microdynamics but average imaging and a finicky deep-fit nozzle. The CIEM version reportedly fixes some of these issues. Excellent microdynamic contrast that makes low-level nuances pop. Lean note weight with mid-treble ring and an uncomfortable long nozzle, plus average imaging versus its peers.
Youtube Video Summary

Hidition Viento B aims for a reference-lean balance: a leveled sub-bass shelf to around 200 Hz, a lean lower midrange, and very emphasized upper-mids with a notable mid-treble lift. On paper it graphs cleanly, but in practice the contrast thins out note weight and exposes a ringy decay on upper harmonics, pushing cymbals and sibilants forward more than natural.

Technicalities are mixed. Microdynamic contrast is the standout, with low-level inflections popping more readily than peers, yet imaging and stage size hover around average for the price. BA timbre remains audible, and the elongated nozzle that mimics a CIEM fit can be uncomfortable unless a deep insertion is possible; the CIEM version is said to mitigate several of these concerns.

Bass: B+ Mids: B+ Treble: B Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: B+

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 7.7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Fantastic colored tonality with options, and the unique technical qualities to back it up. M12/M15 modules recommended.
Youtube Video Summary

The 64 Audio U4s hits a compelling sweet spot: a 1DD+3BA hybrid around $1,100 that echoes the lush, bass-tilted character of the Nio while fixing key drawbacks. Packaging and accessories feel improved, with multiple tip options and the included M12 APEX module; APEX not only tailors bass but also relieves pressure for long sessions. Fit follows 64 Audio’s comfortable triangular shell; the vented DD asks for a slightly shallower insert than the all-BA models. Sonically, expect a sub-bass-oriented shelf and a treble profile that’s more lively and “zingy” than the Nio, with extra energy around the upper treble. The big caveat is 64 Audio’s muted 2–4 kHz region, which can set soprano vocals a step back on the stage.

Against the brand’s full-BA staples (think U12t/U6t), the U4s trades some pinpoint imaging and coherency for unmistakable DD slam and tactile “air pushing.” Extension at both ends is excellent, with upper-treble energy that makes micro-detail and reverb trails pop. It’s not the clean, conventional neutrality of something like a Monarch-style tuning; rather, it’s a deliberate, colored signature that delivers fun plus technical chops. Crucially, it fills a missing niche at its price and, in many respects, outperforms the pricier Nio, making the U4s a standout recommendation for listeners who want bass authority, sparkle, and engaging dynamics without going all-in on the flagship tier.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your 64 Audio U4S or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,122

Buy 64 Audio U4S on audio46

Hidition Viento (more reviews)

Hidition Viento reviewed by Yifang

Yifang 8.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech

Hidition Viento reviewed by Crin

Crin 8.5 Reviewer Score
S+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Best-in-class tuning and tonal balance with near-perfect coherency. Recommended as a custom-fit.
Youtube Video Summary

Hidition is framed as an OG IEM house (founded 2003), and the Viento is praised as the rare decade-old set that still sits in the top tier. Released in the height of the driver wars, it rejected driver-count inflation for a 4-driver, 4-way crossover architecture—each BA handling its own band: sub-bass, lower mids, upper mids, treble. The result is “efficiency” engineering that prioritizes clean division of labor over headcount, following the neutral lineage of the NT6 while modernizing with a subtle sub-bass lift.

The Viento’s two-switch system is highlighted as unusually precise: one switch for sub-bass, one for lower mids, yielding four distinct tunings—A (neutral), B (sub-bass boost), C (lower-mid warmth), and D (both). It’s noted that the custom shell outperforms the universal demo (which can sound a bit bright/shouty due to fit depth), making this one of the few customs actively recommended. In 2023 it sits at S- on the ranking list: versatile across configs, close to an IEF-neutral target, and—relative to today’s market—“cheap” at about $1,000 from Zeppelin & Co. Overall, the Viento is portrayed as lightning in a bottle: enduring tuning, elegant engineering, and real-world usability that keeps it in regular rotation years after release.


Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

64 Audio U4S (more reviews)

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

The 64 Audio U4s hits a compelling sweet spot: a 1DD+3BA hybrid around $1,100 that echoes the lush, bass-tilted character of the Nio while fixing key drawbacks. Packaging and accessories feel improved, with multiple tip options and the included M12 APEX module; APEX not only tailors bass but also relieves pressure for long sessions. Fit follows 64 Audio’s comfortable triangular shell; the vented DD asks for a slightly shallower insert than the all-BA models. Sonically, expect a sub-bass-oriented shelf and a treble profile that’s more lively and “zingy” than the Nio, with extra energy around the upper treble. The big caveat is 64 Audio’s muted 2–4 kHz region, which can set soprano vocals a step back on the stage.

Against the brand’s full-BA staples (think U12t/U6t), the U4s trades some pinpoint imaging and coherency for unmistakable DD slam and tactile “air pushing.” Extension at both ends is excellent, with upper-treble energy that makes micro-detail and reverb trails pop. It’s not the clean, conventional neutrality of something like a Monarch-style tuning; rather, it’s a deliberate, colored signature that delivers fun plus technical chops. Crucially, it fills a missing niche at its price and, in many respects, outperforms the pricier Nio, making the U4s a standout recommendation for listeners who want bass authority, sparkle, and engaging dynamics without going all-in on the flagship tier.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8.5 Reviewer Score
A step down in techs from U12T (possibly a half step down from U6T). But very well tuned and adds in a dynamic driver punch. Timbre is slightly improved compared to U12T due to the increase in midbass and upper mids energy. On the second hand market, 64Audio IEMs are among the best values in portable audio, the U4S is no exception.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
A tastefully colored U12t with a more intimate soundstage, a cutback in technicalities, and more bass realism.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: A Imaging: A+

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It's a solid set, with great build quality, but sonically isn't the specialist that I want it to be.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A+ Treble: B Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B

64 Audio U4S reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8 * score rescaled + normalized
4 community members have rated the 64 Audio U4s at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Hidition Viento User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio U4S User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Hidition Viento Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

64 Audio U4S Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

Hidition Viento Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Tonal balance reaches a highly refined state, sounding seamless from lows to highs. Everything locks together with satisfying coherence.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • The balance of resolution and space feels assured, keeping complex passages coherent. Layering is convincing on most studio mixes.
Bass B+
You get a lively bass response that balances energy with discipline. It balances punch with respectable control.
Mids B+
The region sounds composed and expressive, giving vocals a natural spotlight. It keeps vocals front and center nicely.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics A-
Expect excellent punch and micro-detail that render rhythmic shifts effortlessly. It keeps up with complex rhythmic swings.
Soundstage B+
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Details A-
Low-level information blossoms, presenting a rich tapestry of articulate sound. Analytical listeners will be delighted.
Imaging B+
Layered vocals and harmonies remain distinct and easy to track. Layered vocals remain easy to track.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio U4S Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • A smooth, agreeable balance keeps the presentation engaging without obvious flaws. Only sensitive ears will nitpick the bumps.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Technical chops are reliable, pairing tidy separation with a soundstage that stays conservative. Micro-detail is decent, though never spotlighted.
Bass A+
Expect a gripping low-end presence that marries clarity with visceral impact. Dynamic swings land with thrilling force.
Mids A
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble B+
Expect crisp, well-balanced treble that keeps shimmer intact. You hear reverbs decay naturally.
Dynamics A
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Details A-
Resolution feels both high and relaxed, capturing nuance with ease. There's zero smearing even at high volume.
Imaging A
Depth mapping feels natural and accurate, supporting convincing immersion. Depth mapping feels precise and natural.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Hidition Viento User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio U4S User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer