Hifiman RE600 V2 VS FATfreq x HBB Deuce

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Hifiman RE600 V2 and FATfreq x HBB Deuce use 1DD and 2DD driver setups respectively. Hifiman RE600 V2 costs $200 while FATfreq x HBB Deuce costs $239. FATfreq x HBB Deuce is $39 more expensive. FATfreq x HBB Deuce holds a decisive 4.9-point edge in reviewer scores (2.2 vs 7.1). FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better mids with a 4-point edge and FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge.

Insights

Metric Hifiman RE600 V2 FATfreq x HBB Deuce
Bass 2 2
Mids 3 7
Treble 2 6
Details 2 2
Soundstage 7 7
Imaging 2 2
Dynamics 7 7
Gaming capabilities 2.1 6.6

Hifiman RE600 V2 Aggregated Review Score

Hifiman RE600 V2 Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz

Average Reviewer Score:

2.2

Very Negative


FATfreq x HBB Deuce Aggregated Review Score

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio Jaytiss
Z-Reviews
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.1

Generally Favorable


Hifiman RE600 V2 User Review Score

Hifiman RE600 V2 Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Review Score

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Hifiman RE600 V2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.1

Gaming Grade

E+

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

Hifiman RE600 V2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass E+
Noticeably thin bass presence. Lacks body and texture, leaving low frequencies feeling hollow and underdeveloped.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Details E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

Hifiman RE600 V2 Reviews

Hifiman RE600 V2 reviewed by:

Nymz 2.2 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E+ Tech
Good tuning but time has catched up. Seems slight less resolving than other competitors. Good stage and imaging, bottlenecked by depth. Good vocals.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: E+ Mids: D Treble: E+ Details: E+ Imaging: E+

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Reviews

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Z-Reviews 7 * score normalized

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Super* Review 8.5* * score normalized
This is not my usual sound signature which I like. But it's a lot of fun in a unique way. One-trick pony.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
B+ Tech
The defacto basshead rec before the more expensive stuff. Super fun sub-bass, textured, heavy, prolonged decay for more reverb in the bass, well-balanced as well, smooth and scales great. Tech is not its strong point, and DON'T buy from FatFreq directly!!!

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Jaytiss 6.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
Hits Hard, and is super fun. Suprisingly great mids.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A-

Hifiman RE600 V2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer