Juzear Clear VS EarAcoustics Audio STA-K

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Juzear Clear and EarAcoustics Audio STA-K are in-ear monitors. Juzear Clear costs $50 while EarAcoustics Audio STA-K costs $50. Juzear Clear holds a decisive 1.1-point edge in reviewer scores (6.4 vs 5.3). Juzear Clear has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, EarAcoustics Audio STA-K has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and Juzear Clear has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Juzear Clear EarAcoustics Audio STA-K
Mids 5 3
Treble 4 5
Soundstage 6 5
Dynamics 5 5
Tonality 4.8 4.3
Technicalities 4 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear Clear and EarAcoustics Audio STA-K reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Juzear Clear Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Head-Fi.org
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive


EarAcoustics Audio STA-K Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.3

Mixed to Negative


Reviews Comparison

EarAcoustics Audio STA-K reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-07-25
Jaytiss 5.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C+ Tech
Shouty, Muddy but competent.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: D Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C+

Juzear Clear (more reviews)

Juzear Clear reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7 * score rescaled + normalized

Juzear Clear reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.3 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the JUZEAR CLEAR at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Juzear Clear User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EarAcoustics Audio STA-K User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Juzear Clear Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

EarAcoustics Audio STA-K Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

Juzear Clear Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

EarAcoustics Audio STA-K Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Mids D
Tonal balance in the mids is erratic, with certain notes leaping out unnaturally. Certain notes leap out while others vanish.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Juzear Clear User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

EarAcoustics Audio STA-K User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer