Juzear Clear VS TANGZU X SeeAudio

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Juzear Clear and TANGZU X SeeAudio are in-ear monitors. Juzear Clear costs $50 while TANGZU X SeeAudio costs $50. Juzear Clear holds a decisive 3.9-point edge in reviewer scores (6.4 vs 2.5). Juzear Clear has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Juzear Clear has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge, Juzear Clear has significantly better dynamics with a 4-point edge and Juzear Clear has significantly better soundstage with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Metric Juzear Clear TANGZU X SeeAudio
Mids 5 4
Treble 4 1
Soundstage 6 4
Dynamics 5 1
Tonality 4.8 2.5
Technicalities 4 1
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear Clear and TANGZU X SeeAudio reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Juzear Clear Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Head-Fi.org
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive


TANGZU X SeeAudio Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

2.5

Very Negative


Reviews Comparison

TANGZU X SeeAudio reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 2.5 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
E- Tech
Very Bland. A bit warm, but not terible.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: C-

Juzear Clear (more reviews)

Juzear Clear reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7 * score rescaled + normalized

Juzear Clear reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.3 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the JUZEAR CLEAR at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Juzear Clear User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

TANGZU X SeeAudio User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Juzear Clear Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

TANGZU X SeeAudio Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.5

Gaming Grade

E

Juzear Clear Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

TANGZU X SeeAudio Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • Balance is severely off, producing a harsh, unpleasant listen regardless of genre. Long sessions quickly become exhausting.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • The presentation is claustrophobic and blurred, leaving simple arrangements sounding chaotic and lifeless. The presentation feels more like background noise than music.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable yet unrefined, revealing grain and occasional harshness. It sounds a bit grainy on detailed recordings.
Treble E-
Expect severely attenuated treble that leaves textures subdued. Everything sounds veiled and muted.
Dynamics E-
It cannot muster meaningful volume gradation, making tracks feel static. It drains life from energetic music.
Soundstage C-
Stereo spread is acceptable, yet the image resembles a stage set without depth behind the curtain. Depth feels more like a gentle slope.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Juzear Clear User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

TANGZU X SeeAudio User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer