MYER SL224 VS JVC x Drop FDX1

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

MYER SL224 and JVC x Drop FDX1 are in-ear monitors. MYER SL224 costs $270 while JVC x Drop FDX1 costs $250. MYER SL224 is $20 more expensive. MYER SL224 holds a decisive 1.2-point edge in reviewer scores (7.5 vs 6.3). MYER SL224 has significantly better bass with a 3.7-point edge, MYER SL224 has significantly better mids with a 2.5-point edge, MYER SL224 has significantly better treble with a 2.9-point edge, MYER SL224 has significantly better dynamics with a 3.2-point edge, MYER SL224 has significantly better details with a 2.6-point edge and MYER SL224 has significantly better imaging with a 2.4-point edge.

Insights

Metric MYER SL224 JVC x Drop FDX1
Bass 8.2 4.5
Mids 7.5 5
Treble 7.4 4.5
Details 8.1 5.5
Soundstage 8.1 6.3
Imaging 7.9 5.5
Dynamics 8.2 5
Tonality 8 5.6
Technicalities 7.5 5.8
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough JVC x Drop FDX1 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

MYER SL224 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Gizaudio Axel
Jays Audio Web Search
Jaytiss Kois Archive

Average Reviewer Score:

7.5

Strongly Favorable


JVC x Drop FDX1 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz
Precogvision
Crin
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

MYER SL224 (more reviews)

MYER SL224 reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-09-24
Jaytiss 8.6 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Nice set, very clean and correctly energetic.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: S-
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your MYER SL224 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $230

Buy MYER SL224 on HiFiGO

MYER SL224 reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Rating: S- | Value: ⭐⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮 | Comfort: 8 excellent mid treble focused set can be shouty to some
Youtube Video Summary

The MYER SL224 is a stylish tribrid (2DD + 2BA + 4 microplanars) coming in around $270, shipped with a decent 4-core cable featuring 3.5 / 4.4 / USB-C interchangeable plugs, a zipper case, and three ear-tip sets (regular silicone, SpinFit-style silicone, foam). Build is eye-catching thanks to a real mother-of-pearl faceplate; the shell is on the larger side with a universal-custom shape that sits comfortably for long sessions, though smaller ears should test fit first. Cable behavior is mostly cooperative (functional chin slider, slight memory), and overall accessories feel thoughtful for the price.

Tonally, SL224 targets a clean, clinical presentation: sub-bass carries the weight while mid-bass stays nearer to neutral, which can read a touch lean unless paired with a warmer source (tube or similar) to add body. The midrange tracks neutral until the upper-mid / lower-treble rise, boosting female vocal harmonics and air; some may find this area forward, yet it avoids the usual micro-planar harshness. Treble is well-extended and energetic, if not the smoothest—there’s a hint of disconnect around the pinna gain—but this nit shows mainly against sets two to three times the price. Technical chops are a highlight: resolution rivals class standouts (think AFUL P7 territory), imaging is tidy, stage is fairly wide, and it earns a strong nod for competitive gaming.

Against peers, CK2V hits harder down low but dips mid-bass and feels less even up top; AFUL P7 is more balanced yet less flattering to female vocals and trickier in treble; “Dusk” (DSP) delivers better bass and a warmer tilt; “Brain Dance” is flashier but far sharper; Moondrop Meteor tracks a similar tonality with smoother highs and a mid-centric lean—an easy upgrade path if this signature clicks. Recommendation is clear: pick SL224 for a mid/treble-focused set with standout detail and clarity; skip it if sensitive to upper-mid energy or chasing a warm, bass-rich tuning. For value, this feels underrated and distinct in a meta-heavy market, earning a solid three-star recommendation.


Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

MYER SL224 reviewed by Jays Audio

2025-07-10
Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Same tuning as the EPZ P50 but fancier with a little more sub-bass, and slightly more detailed in the treble but barely noticeable. This is "technically" better, but P50 would be the better value since you can get it for around $160 on sale.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

MYER SL224 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

2025-07-31
Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
Good for vocal lovers. Not ideal if you want a strong bass boost. Natural vocals, clear mids, and smooth, detailed treble. Clean and balanced sound with a nice touch of air and sparkle. Bass is polite and reserved. Can feel a bit incohesive at times.
Youtube Video Summary

Packaging overdelivers: a modular cable with 3.5/4.4/USB-C and an included dongle that gets loud enough, seven pairs of silicone tips plus foam, and a small zip case (nice but tight). The shell looks premium with a depth-effect faceplate and a metal nozzle (≈6.1 mm lip); fit is snug though potentially big for smaller ears. Build and accessories feel thoughtful at the price, with only a slightly rubbery cable texture to nitpick.

Tuning is a smooth, vocal-focused, meta-inspired balance: refined mids, a friendly yet detailed top end, and a clean, controlled low end. Bass quality is textured and separated but intentionally polite—not for hip-hop/EDM impact chasers. The midrange brings clear, natural tone without shout; both male and female vocals sit forward. The treble is the star: highly resolving, airy, and surprisingly non-fatiguing for the four micro-planars, avoiding metallic glare while adding tasteful sparkle.

Technically, separation and resolution impress, with a mild cohesiveness quirk where the treble detail outshines bass/mids. Versus peers: CK2V is more V-shaped and brighter-hot; SL224 sounds more natural. Moondrop Meteor offers smoother treble and mid timbre, but SL224’s bass quality and value punch back. Dunu Brain Dance is technically stronger; SL224 wins on tonality. SoftEars Studio 4 remains more lifelike/cohesive; SL224 brings more air and fun. AFUL Performer 7 is the better all-rounder; SL224 is for lighter-bass, vocal clarity. Kiwi Ears Astral is airier/more micro-detailed; SL224 plays it safer up top with more forward vocals. Recommendation: vocal lovers and treble-sensitive listeners wanting detail without sting. Not for bassheads or warm-tilted tastes. Final verdict: a confident 4/5 and the most compelling Myer release so far.


Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

MYER SL224 reviewed by Web Search

2025-10-07
uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech

The MYER SLIIVO SL224 is an eight-driver hybrid built around 2DD+2BA+4 micro-planar units with a 36 Ω impedance and 108 dB sensitivity, positioned at an MSRP around $269.99 (often on sale near $230). This configuration, including 10 mm and 6 mm dynamic drivers, suggests an intent toward a clean, extended response rather than a bass-dominant tuning. Specs & pricing: 2DD+2BA+4 micro-planar, 10 mm + 6 mm DD, swappable 3.5/4.4/Type-C cable, sale price ~$229.49, regular $269.99.

Subjective reports converge on a balanced/neutral tonality with energetic yet controlled low end from the dual-DD array, lively mids, and an airy but not piercing treble. Mobileaudiophile characterizes bass as fast and powerful with engaging mids and treble, yielding a coherent, never-boring balance; this aligns with the SL224’s technical focus rather than coloration. Tonality & balance references: balanced tuning, lively mids, airy treble; bass praised for speed and control.

Technical impressions emphasize dynamics, detail retrieval, and cleanliness, with community notes calling out tight, quick mid-bass and respectable separation; limitations include occasional midrange forwardness that can mask other bands on some tracks and a stage that reads more precise than expansive. These traits point to strong value in the ~$230 bracket for listeners prioritizing clarity and midrange presence over sheer sub-bass weight. Community impressions & caveats: tight mid-bass, good dynamics; mids can get a bit forward depending on material.


Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A

JVC x Drop FDX1 (more reviews)

JVC x Drop FDX1 reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8.5* * score rescaled + normalized

JVC x Drop FDX1 reviewed by Crin

Crin 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Highly technical sound with a clean, well-tuned neutral signature.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

JVC x Drop FDX1 reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 5.2 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B- Tech
Good tonal balance and technicalities, but decay is truncated which results in etched timbre. Dynamics are also dull.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: B Imaging: B

JVC x Drop FDX1 reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 4.6 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C Tech
Metalic timbre with fast decay. A little more enphasis around 4.5k than I would like, but overall pleasent tuning. Very technical, just lacking some dynamics and treble refinement.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

MYER SL224 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

JVC x Drop FDX1 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

MYER SL224 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.6

Gaming Grade

A

JVC x Drop FDX1 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.7

Gaming Grade

B-

MYER SL224 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Technical performance is solid, offering clear separation and consistent detail retrieval. There's enough space for instruments to breathe.
Bass A+
Bass performance is excellent, combining depth with rock-solid control. Basslines feel tactile and enveloping.
Mids A
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics A+
It captures both explosive hits and delicate shifts with lifelike realism. Micro-dynamics shimmer through the mix.
Soundstage A+
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.
Details A+
Inner textures glow vividly yet never feel etched or artificial. It borders on studio-monitor transparency.
Imaging A
Each element locks into a steady coordinate even as the mix grows dense. Imaging holds even during busy segments.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

JVC x Drop FDX1 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Bass C
Bass stays subdued, content to hover in the background. It keeps things tidy, yet unremarkable.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Details B-
Plenty of nuance surfaces, just not the last layer of shimmer. It balances clarity with an easygoing tone.
Imaging B-
Stereo cues lock in more reliably, even if depth mapping remains approximate. Panning transitions smoothly across the stage.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

MYER SL224 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

JVC x Drop FDX1 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer