Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing VS CCA Phoenix

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing and CCA Phoenix are in-ear monitors. Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing costs $30 while CCA Phoenix costs $29. Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing is $1 more expensive. CCA Phoenix holds a clear 0.9-point edge in reviewer scores (5.7 vs 6.6). CCA Phoenix has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and CCA Phoenix has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing CCA Phoenix
Mids 5 5
Treble 3 6
Soundstage 6 6.5
Dynamics 4 5
Tonality 5 5.6
Technicalities 3 6
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing and CCA Phoenix reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

5.7

Mixed

CCA Phoenix Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6.6

Cautiously Favorable

Reviews Comparison

Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
D Tech
It's a more analytical Abyss, Great fitting like the Abyss.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: D Dynamics: C- Soundstage: B

CCA Phoenix reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-10-11
Jaytiss 6.6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B Tech
It's a nice easy set, fun and enjoyable.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B+
YouTube video thumbnail

Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing (more reviews)

Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.4 * score rescaled + normalized
14 community members have rated the Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing at an average of 4.1/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

CCA Phoenix User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.6

Gaming Grade

D+

CCA Phoenix Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Mids C+
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble D
Treble balance wavers, creating a mix of recessed detail and harsh flashes. Highs feel restless and unfocused.
Dynamics C-
It maintains a steady dynamic profile that neither offends nor inspires. Swells arrive but lack drama.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

CCA Phoenix Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B+
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

Kinera Celest Wyvern Qing User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

CCA Phoenix User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer