Kotori Audio Dauntless VS Oriveti Dynabird

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Kotori Audio Dauntless and Oriveti Dynabird are in-ear monitors. Kotori Audio Dauntless costs $93 while Oriveti Dynabird costs $99. Oriveti Dynabird is $6 more expensive. Oriveti Dynabird holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (4.7 vs 6). Oriveti Dynabird has significantly better mids with a 1.5-point edge, Kotori Audio Dauntless has significantly better treble with a 1.5-point edge and Oriveti Dynabird has significantly better soundstage with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Metric Kotori Audio Dauntless Oriveti Dynabird
Bass 3.5 3.5
Mids 3.5 5
Treble 4.5 3
Details 6 6
Soundstage 5 7
Imaging 5.5 5.5
Dynamics 5 5
Gaming capabilities 5 5.1

Kotori Audio Dauntless Aggregated Review Score

Kotori Audio Dauntless Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable


Oriveti Dynabird Aggregated Review Score

Oriveti Dynabird Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio Jaytiss
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6

Mixed to Positive


Kotori Audio Dauntless User Review Score

Kotori Audio Dauntless Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Oriveti Dynabird User Review Score

Oriveti Dynabird Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Kotori Audio Dauntless Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Oriveti Dynabird Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

Kotori Audio Dauntless Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass D+
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids D+
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble C
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Oriveti Dynabird Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Kotori Audio Dauntless Reviews

Kotori Audio Dauntless reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 4.7 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
B- Tech
Comment: Bright-sounding. Somewhat spherical 3-D soundstage Strange midrange, shouty female vocals

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: D+ Mids: D+ Treble: C Soundstage: C+ Details: B Imaging: B-

Oriveti Dynabird Reviews

Oriveti Dynabird reviewed by:

Z-Reviews 7.5 * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Oriveti Dynabird or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $94.99

Buy Oriveti Dynabird on Hifigo

Oriveti Dynabird reviewed by:

Jays Audio 5.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech
Vocal focused and clean, but 2K gain can be too much plus the uppermids/treble. Good tech.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

Oriveti Dynabird reviewed by:

Jaytiss 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
D Tech
A fun V -Shape.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: C+ Treble: D Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Kotori Audio Dauntless User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Oriveti Dynabird User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer