Linhi Bright 2 VS Tangzu Wan Er

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Linhi Bright 2 and Tangzu Wan Er are in-ear monitors. Linhi Bright 2 costs $16 while Tangzu Wan Er costs $20. Tangzu Wan Er is $4 more expensive. Tangzu Wan Er holds a decisive 2.8-point edge in reviewer scores (2.2 vs 5). Tangzu Wan Er has significantly better bass with a 5-point edge, Tangzu Wan Er has significantly better mids with a 4.8-point edge, Tangzu Wan Er has significantly better treble with a 3.5-point edge, Tangzu Wan Er has significantly better soundstage with a 2-point edge, Tangzu Wan Er has significantly better details with a 2-point edge and Tangzu Wan Er has significantly better imaging with a 3.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Linhi Bright 2 Tangzu Wan Er
Bass 1 6
Mids 2 6.8
Treble 2 5.5
Details 3 5
Soundstage 3 5
Imaging 2 5.5
Gaming capabilities 2.4 5.4

Linhi Bright 2 Aggregated Review Score

Linhi Bright 2 Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

2.2

Very Negative


Tangzu Wan Er Aggregated Review Score

Tangzu Wan Er Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio
Tim Tuned Shuwa-T
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5

Mixed to Negative


Linhi Bright 2 User Review Score

Linhi Bright 2 Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tangzu Wan Er User Review Score

Tangzu Wan Er Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Linhi Bright 2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.4

Gaming Grade

E+

Tangzu Wan Er Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.4

Gaming Grade

C+

Linhi Bright 2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

D-
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass E-
Bass is extremely weak and barely noticeable. Fails to provide any meaningful foundation to the music.
Mids E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Soundstage D
Modest soundstage that feels confined. Some left/right separation but completely lacks depth and height dimensions.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Tangzu Wan Er Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Linhi Bright 2 Reviews

Linhi Bright 2 reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 2.2 Reviewer Score
E Tuning
D- Tech
Comment: Only available via Chinese shopping platforms. ??? Where do I start

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: E- Mids: E+ Treble: E+ Soundstage: D Details: D Imaging: E+

Tangzu Wan Er Reviews

Tangzu Wan Er reviewed by:

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Basically the modded Zero with slight more bass. Most vocal forward out of the $20 sets.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

Tangzu Wan Er reviewed by:

Super* Review 6* * score normalized

Tangzu Wan Er reviewed by:

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Can't believe this is $20.... Details is only okay

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A-

Tangzu Wan Er reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Comment: It's literally $20, recommended to buy when starting out or as a beater set. Probably the most balanced sounding at its price Average tech like its other counterparts, bass is less controlled

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: C+ Mids: B- Treble: C- Soundstage: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: B-

Linhi Bright 2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Wan Er User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer