MYER SL224 VS Crinear Daybreak

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

MYER SL224 and Crinear Daybreak use 2DD+2BA+4Micro-Planar and 1DD+2BA+2mPT driver setups respectively. MYER SL224 costs $270 while Crinear Daybreak costs $170. MYER SL224 is $100 more expensive. MYER SL224 holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.4 vs 7.3). Crinear Daybreak carries a user score of 7.4. MYER SL224 has better bass with a 0.6-point edge, MYER SL224 has significantly better treble with a 1.2-point edge, MYER SL224 has better dynamics with a 0.9-point edge and MYER SL224 has significantly better soundstage with a 1.3-point edge.

Insights

Metric MYER SL224 Crinear Daybreak
Bass 8.2 7.6
Mids 7.5 7.6
Treble 7.4 6.2
Details 8.1 8
Soundstage 8.1 6.9
Imaging 7.9 7.8
Dynamics 8.2 7.3
Tonality 7.7 7.5
Technicalities 7.1 6.8
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough MYER SL224 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

MYER SL224 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Gizaudio Axel
Jays Audio Web Search
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Crinear Daybreak Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Jaytiss Fox Told Me So Jays Audio Web Search
Super* Review Audionotions

Average Reviewer Score:

7.3

Generally Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-07-31
Jaytiss 7.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Lacks silky treble, but it's fine. But fine isn't good enough.
Youtube Video Summary

The CrinEar Daybreak features a metal nozzle and metal faceplate with comfortable contours, though the fit is noted as a bit dainty and small. Isolation is practically non-existent, and the fit isn't particularly secure. The included cable looks nice and photographs well, featuring interchangeable terminations for versatility, but its chin slider moves too easily and isn't recommended for those needing a functional one. The case is deemed aesthetically pleasing and feels good, though not especially premium, magnetically shutting with adequate space.

Sonically, the Daybreak leans boring and somewhat sterile or dry. It offers nice bass and a lot of upper mids, which are done decently with a standard 3K peak. However, the combination of this upper-mid focus and an incisive peak around 8K contributes to a perceived harshness and sharpness, lacking in overall detail retrieval. Graph comparisons reveal its signature has significantly more upper mids and often more bass than competitors like the Moondrop Dusk or TruthEar Nova, resulting in a less engaging listen. Sets like the Defiant, Chopin, and Performer 7 are cited as more engaging alternatives at similar or lower prices, with the Defiant specifically recommended over the Daybreak. Even the Punch Audio martillo and Moondrop Meteor, sharing driver configurations, are considered more fun or better tuned.

Ultimately, the Daybreak is a solid A-minus IEM, well-packaged and a commendable first effort for the brand, but it's not hypeworthy or a benchmark. It lacks imagination and falls short against numerous compelling alternatives around its price point, such as the Performer 7, ZOS Defiant, Chopin, or discounted planar options like the Aether. While a good value, especially if found on sale via Linsoul or the used market, its piercing upper mids and failure to truly excel make it hard to fully recommend over the competition.

Mids: A- Treble: C+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Crinear Daybreak or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $169.99

Buy Crinear Daybreak on Linsoul

MYER SL224 reviewed by Jays Audio

2025-07-10
Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Same tuning as the EPZ P50 but fancier with a little more sub-bass, and slightly more detailed in the treble but barely noticeable. This is "technically" better, but P50 would be the better value since you can get it for around $160 on sale.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Jays Audio

2025-07-16
Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Here we go again. Very similar tuning as P50 and SL224. Less vocal centric vs P50s, but more bassy and all-rounded. Slightly slightly less technical than SL224.
Youtube Video Summary

The CrinEar Daybreak offers a balanced, clean, and non-fatiguing sound signature, functioning effectively as an all-rounder. Every frequency region is solid, delivering a smooth presentation without harshness or overwhelming warmth. The bass provides a slight sub-bass rumble and integrates cleanly into the mids, avoiding bleed, though it lacks significant impact, slam, or deep texture. Similarly, the mid-range and vocals are well-separated and forward enough, free from congestion or odd timbre, but don't specialize. The treble has enough extension and air, avoiding darkness or excessive sharpness, but misses out on micro-detail, sparkle, and expansive staging. It’s a decent, inoffensive performer across the board, described aptly as a "very good vanilla ice cream cone".

Technically, the Daybreak is competitive but not class-leading. Sets like the Meta, Ziigaat Crescent, Kiwi Ears Astral, Simgot EM6L, or TruthEar Nova offer slightly better detail retrieval, imaging, and resolution. Its main challenge comes from remarkably similar competitors, particularly the EPZ P50 and SLIIVO SL224, which share nearly identical tuning, driver configurations, and technical performance around the same $160-$180 price point. The P50 leans slightly more vocal-centric, while the SL224 offers marginally better bass texture and treble detail (though costing more). If you already own either, the Daybreak becomes largely redundant. Against alternatives like the bassier, more dynamic Ziigaat Odyssey ($200), the Daybreak feels safer but less engaging at higher volumes. Compared to Harman-tuned sets like the Supermix 4, Chopin, or Nova, the Daybreak boasts fuller tonality and less fatigue but gives up some layering and detail.

Ultimately, the Daybreak is a competent, well-packaged all-rounder at $170, delivering a balanced and inoffensive listen suitable for any genre library. However, it fails to stand out uniquely in a crowded field. Its sound signature is replicated almost exactly by the existing P50 and SL224. While it earns a half recommendation as a solid option for those seeking a non-fatiguing all-rounder who *don't* own those twins, it's unlikely to become a favorite due to its lack of distinctive character. Value is decent, but alternatives offer more specialization or technical prowess for similar or lower cost.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

MYER SL224 reviewed by Web Search

2025-10-07
uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech

The MYER SLIIVO SL224 is an eight-driver hybrid built around 2DD+2BA+4 micro-planar units with a 36 Ω impedance and 108 dB sensitivity, positioned at an MSRP around $269.99 (often on sale near $230). This configuration, including 10 mm and 6 mm dynamic drivers, suggests an intent toward a clean, extended response rather than a bass-dominant tuning. Specs & pricing: 2DD+2BA+4 micro-planar, 10 mm + 6 mm DD, swappable 3.5/4.4/Type-C cable, sale price ~$229.49, regular $269.99.

Subjective reports converge on a balanced/neutral tonality with energetic yet controlled low end from the dual-DD array, lively mids, and an airy but not piercing treble. Mobileaudiophile characterizes bass as fast and powerful with engaging mids and treble, yielding a coherent, never-boring balance; this aligns with the SL224’s technical focus rather than coloration. Tonality & balance references: balanced tuning, lively mids, airy treble; bass praised for speed and control.

Technical impressions emphasize dynamics, detail retrieval, and cleanliness, with community notes calling out tight, quick mid-bass and respectable separation; limitations include occasional midrange forwardness that can mask other bands on some tracks and a stage that reads more precise than expansive. These traits point to strong value in the ~$230 bracket for listeners prioritizing clarity and midrange presence over sheer sub-bass weight. Community impressions & caveats: tight mid-bass, good dynamics; mids can get a bit forward depending on material.


Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Web Search

2025-07-25
uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech

The CrinEar Daybreak is a tri-brid IEM built around a 5-driver array—1DD + 2BA + 2 micro-planar tweeters—with a moderate 20 Ω load and 105 dB/mW sensitivity, making it easy to drive from portable sources. MSRP sits at $169.99, placing it squarely in the competitive mid-budget segment. These core specs are confirmed on the official product page and retail listings.

Tonally, Daybreak trends toward neutral with a mild sub-bass lift and restrained warmth, but listener experience can swing with tip choice. Multiple independent impressions note a touch of upper-mid / lower-treble energy (ear-gain region) on stock narrow-bore tips, which relaxes with wide-bore options; overall midrange balance and resolution are strong for the price. These observations are echoed in in-depth evaluations and measurements from Headphones.com’s reviews.

Build is a resin shell with metal faceplate and a compact pseudo-custom profile; comfort is generally good, though the 6 mm nozzle and angle may not be ideal for every ear. Accessory quality is serviceable—SPC cable with interchangeable 3.5 mm / 4.4 mm terminations, a leatherette case, and basic tips—leaving room for aftermarket tip rolling to fine-tune treble behavior and staging. These physical details and inclusions are documented by the maker and retailers.


Bass: A Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A Soundstage: A- Details: A+ Imaging: A

MYER SL224 (more reviews)

MYER SL224 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

2025-07-31
Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
Good for vocal lovers. Not ideal if you want a strong bass boost. Natural vocals, clear mids, and smooth, detailed treble. Clean and balanced sound with a nice touch of air and sparkle. Bass is polite and reserved. Can feel a bit incohesive at times.
Youtube Video Summary

Packaging overdelivers: a modular cable with 3.5/4.4/USB-C and an included dongle that gets loud enough, seven pairs of silicone tips plus foam, and a small zip case (nice but tight). The shell looks premium with a depth-effect faceplate and a metal nozzle (≈6.1 mm lip); fit is snug though potentially big for smaller ears. Build and accessories feel thoughtful at the price, with only a slightly rubbery cable texture to nitpick.

Tuning is a smooth, vocal-focused, meta-inspired balance: refined mids, a friendly yet detailed top end, and a clean, controlled low end. Bass quality is textured and separated but intentionally polite—not for hip-hop/EDM impact chasers. The midrange brings clear, natural tone without shout; both male and female vocals sit forward. The treble is the star: highly resolving, airy, and surprisingly non-fatiguing for the four micro-planars, avoiding metallic glare while adding tasteful sparkle.

Technically, separation and resolution impress, with a mild cohesiveness quirk where the treble detail outshines bass/mids. Versus peers: CK2V is more V-shaped and brighter-hot; SL224 sounds more natural. Moondrop Meteor offers smoother treble and mid timbre, but SL224’s bass quality and value punch back. Dunu Brain Dance is technically stronger; SL224 wins on tonality. SoftEars Studio 4 remains more lifelike/cohesive; SL224 brings more air and fun. AFUL Performer 7 is the better all-rounder; SL224 is for lighter-bass, vocal clarity. Kiwi Ears Astral is airier/more micro-detailed; SL224 plays it safer up top with more forward vocals. Recommendation: vocal lovers and treble-sensitive listeners wanting detail without sting. Not for bassheads or warm-tilted tastes. Final verdict: a confident 4/5 and the most compelling Myer release so far.


Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak (more reviews)

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Super* Review

2025-07-25
Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Spot-on tonality. Everything sounds very natural and not contrasty. Vocal texturing is above average. Low-contrast sound signature. Bass is not that tight.
Youtube Video Summary

The CrinEar Daybreak lands at $170 as the second IEM from Crinacle, positioned as a more accessible follow-up to the limited-edition Meta. This tribrid features a single dynamic driver, two balanced armatures, and two micro planars handling the highs. The build includes compact, semi-custom dark smoky resin shells offering good stability and comfort, though the molding might be slightly aggressive for some. The included cable provides swappable terminations (3.5mm and 4.4mm) but is noted for being somewhat stiff and kink-prone. Accessories are solid for the price, including a leatherette case and multiple tip options, with the stock silicones recommended for optimal fit due to the slightly longer nozzle.

Sonically, the Daybreak delivers what the review calls the best tonal balance yet within the popular "new meta" tuning category. Its frequency response is described as exceptionally neutral and natural from the mid-bass upwards, creating a low-contrast, chill, and non-fatiguing listen with forward, textured vocals and non-existent sibilance. However, this comes with trade-offs: the bass lacks ultimate tightness and slam, and the treble exhibits a light, wispy quality (likened to cotton candy) that lacks some bite and definition. While technical performance like imaging is solid, it doesn't stand out as exceptional.

In direct comparisons with six competitors around $200 (including the Meta, Binary x Chopin, EPZ P50, Ziigaat Lush, Truthear Pure, and Kiwi Ears KE4), the Daybreak consistently ranked highest for tonality. It was praised as a modern benchmark for natural tuning at its price. However, it fell behind in bass physicality and treble incisiveness. Ultimately rated a strong four stars, the Daybreak is highlighted as an excellent choice for those prioritizing a refined, natural midrange and easy listening experience over sheer technical prowess or visceral impact, earning the label of a "modern-day Etymotic ER2XR" with far better comfort.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8 Reviewer Score
Slightly V-Shaped take on the JM-1 Meta. Some may find it a bit intense - especially in the upper treble, and perhaps the upper mids - it can sometimes border on being a tad shouty. Clean sounding throughout with great mids. Good contrasty sound. Mostly neutral sound signature. Thank you Crin, for making this non-limited vs. the Crinear Meta. I thoroughly enjoy this much more than the limited release. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Fox Told Me So

2025-09-26
Fox Told Me So 7.2 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
What could you expect from JM-1?
This is it.

Crinear Daybreak's tuning follows the New Meta family with two quirks: a dip at 400 Hz that slightly thins male vocals, and a dip around 8 kHz that smooths treble but softens cymbals/overtones. Otherwise it’s safe, balanced, and within preference bounds.

Bass has moderate body with audible rumble and quick decay, though slam could hit harder; Mids sit neutral, neither pushed nor recessed, keeping instruments evenly balanced; Treble rolls off smoothly—pleasant, but lacks the final lift that would open it up. Resolution is average for the price: clear layers but compressed depth, like a lasagna being pressed flat.

Within the $169 bracket, Daybreak is neutral, natural, and non-fatiguing—an easy daily driver.

Fox Told Me So original ranking

Fox Told Me So Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Z-Reviews

2025-08-23
Z-Reviews 6 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

The Crinacle Daybreak is a technically excellent IEM that offers exceptional clarity and detail retrieval without being fatiguing. Its five-driver configuration delivers a cohesive and precise sound signature that is clean, flat, and incredibly balanced. The bass is present and punchy but never exaggerated, making it a perfect tool for studying music and hearing every nuance in a recording.

However, this precision comes at the cost of fun. The tuning is described as a little dry and somewhat intimate, lacking the expansive soundstage and flavorful character that makes other IEMs more engaging for pure enjoyment. While the build is solid with an acceptable cable and nice connectors, its looks are admittedly boring. It’s a perfectly cooked meal that follows the recipe without any surprises.

Ultimately, the Daybreak is a highly respected and much-loved IEM that fills a specific niche for a clean, reference-like sound. It’s a business suit of an IEM, but it wouldn't be the first choice for someone looking for a more exciting, fun, or "f***ed up" sound signature to get them moving. It commands respect for its technical merits, even if it isn't to everyone's personal taste.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

MYER SL224 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Crinear Daybreak User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7.4

Generally Favorable

MYER SL224 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.3

Gaming Grade

A-

Crinear Daybreak Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

MYER SL224 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • A competent technical showing keeps separation intact while delivering modest staging. It feels tidy even when recordings stack layers.
Bass A+
Bass performance is excellent, combining depth with rock-solid control. Basslines feel tactile and enveloping.
Mids A
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics A+
It captures both explosive hits and delicate shifts with lifelike realism. Micro-dynamics shimmer through the mix.
Soundstage A+
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.
Details A+
Inner textures glow vividly yet never feel etched or artificial. It borders on studio-monitor transparency.
Imaging A
Each element locks into a steady coordinate even as the mix grows dense. Imaging holds even during busy segments.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Crinear Daybreak Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning lands in a pleasing sweet spot with mostly coherent frequency integration. Tonality stays consistent from track to track.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass A
Expect a commanding bass response that reaches deep without clouding the mix. There's both slam and nuance in equal measure.
Mids A
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble B
Treble is articulate and clean, adding excitement without harshness. It adds sparkle without harshness.
Dynamics A-
It delivers crisp, authoritative dynamics that keep music thrilling. Subtle level shifts are clearly conveyed.
Soundstage B+
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Details A+
Complex productions unravel completely, letting you examine every thread. Textures are rendered with exquisite finesse.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging delivers precise, stable placement with instruments occupying tangible points in space. It locks each element into a steady position.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations.

MYER SL224 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Crinear Daybreak User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Strix
7.4

A well-toned, easy-listening IEM that excels at midrange clarity even if it doesn’t dazzle technically.

Tuning: A+ Tech: A- Bass: B+ Mids: S- Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A- Imaging: A-
Pros
Balanced and non-fatiguing tuning with smooth, natural mids.
Cons
Bass lacks slam and treble can feel veiled or lacking crisp sparkle.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer