Nicehck Rockies VS AFUL Dawn-X

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Nicehck Rockies and AFUL Dawn-X use 1DD+2BA+2EST and 1DD+8BA+4EST+1BC driver setups respectively. Nicehck Rockies costs $499 while AFUL Dawn-X costs $1,299. AFUL Dawn-X is $800 more expensive. AFUL Dawn-X holds a clear 0.7-point edge in reviewer scores (8 vs 8.7). Nicehck Rockies carries a user score of 9. AFUL Dawn-X has better treble with a 0.8-point edge, AFUL Dawn-X has slightly better soundstage with a 0.4-point edge, AFUL Dawn-X has slightly better details with a 0.4-point edge and Nicehck Rockies has slightly better imaging with a 0.3-point edge.

Insights

Metric Nicehck Rockies AFUL Dawn-X
Bass 8.4 8.5
Mids 8.7 8.5
Treble 8.1 8.9
Details 8.1 8.5
Soundstage 8.1 8.5
Imaging 8.3 8
Dynamics 7.6 7.5
Tonality 8.5 8.8
Technicalities 8.5 9.2

Nicehck Rockies Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8

Strongly Favorable


AFUL Dawn-X Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.7

Excellent


Reviews Comparison

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 9.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Trebble so nice. Feels faultless and amazing.
Youtube Video Summary

NiceHCK Rockies lands in the ~$500 bracket with a 1DD+2BA+2EST setup and a surprisingly premium package. The hollow resin shell feels solid, with a metal nozzle, slightly recessed 2-pin, good isolation, and comfy fit. The swappable-termination cable is thick, pliant, and lays flat—no chin slider out of the box, but easy to add—and the excellent case and tip kit push the accessories into “above class” territory.

Tonally, Rockies goes for tight, controlled bass and a natural midrange, capped by upper-treble that’s sparkly yet refined—detailed without getting shouty or brittle. The graph reads largely flat with a tasteful treble lift, translating to a clean, clear presentation that stays engaging rather than fatiguing. It comes across as an “instant classic” tuning: lively, airy, but still grounded.

Compared with brand siblings (DB2 too upper-midsy; F1 Pro/NX8 fine but not special), Rockies feels like the step up. Versus peers, it splits the difference: more air and delicacy than RSV MK2 (which is bassier/darker), less sizzle than sets that chase treble for effect, and broadly similar endgame vibes to “good” units of Mega5-EST—variance there being the rub. Net: a high-value pick at its price, worthy of a Gold Star—not a universal “benchmark,” but a sweet, natural, clear listen that many will prefer, especially with the standout accessories.

Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S-

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Nicehck Rockies or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $499

Buy Nicehck Rockies on NiceHCK

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 9.6 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
This has a really natural midrange, best BC iem I've heard by far.
Youtube Video Summary

Large, sculpted shells with a bulbous rear (housing the bone conductor) make the Aful Dawn-X a substantial fit—comfortable for some, but risky for small ears. The stock cable feels quality but is 4.4 mm-only, and the case/accessories are tidy; importantly, the nozzle grips tips securely (unlike some past AFUL sets). Overall build is handsome and premium, with fit being the main variable.

Sonically, the tuning favors sub-bass over mid-bass, pairs rich mids with smooth, natural treble that avoids harsh spikes yet has mild 4–6 kHz energy, and presents a cohesive, almost speaker-like soundstage. It wakes up with a bit of volume/power, prioritizing clarity, micro-detail and air over outright slam; the bone conductor subtly supports the midrange more than the lows. At $1,300 it’s competitive for listeners chasing technical refinement and a natural tonality, while value seekers or mid-bass lovers may prefer cheaper AFUL options or sets with more punch.

Mids: S Treble: S Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your AFUL Dawn-X or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,299

Buy AFUL Dawn-X on HiFiGO

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8.5 Reviewer Score
My favorite take on the JM1 meta so far. Bass tuning is well done with adequate weight and punch - it's not standout but it will do the job. Silky smoooooth and rich mids with very good clarity. Treble that leans slightly bright but is never sharp. Very good transient response, especially with things like plucking sounds and the like. Renders strings very well. Some people might find the treble a bit forward but I don't personally find this to be an issue, except on certain tracks. It's an IEM that is hard to fault and one that will handle anything you throw at it well. Very suitable as a one-and-done IEM.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 9 Reviewer Score
Slightly warm tilted neutral. Very well balanced with a tasteful bass boost. Bass is surprisingly very weighty and textured with quick decay so bass notes don't linger and overstay their welcome. Lush sounding with very good vocals. Typical AFUL pinna gain region which, as expected, results in very pleasant female vocals that aren't in your face and aren't shouty. Treble is very well extended with a good amount of shimmer and air but at the same time it never gets sibilant. In fact, I'd say treble is silky smooth. Imaging is crisp and realistic with fantastic instrument separation. The stage is enveloping, with good depth and width but it's not excessively large - overall it sounds very natural, with distinctly noticeable layering. Very good technicalities. This is the peak of the AFUL house sound and to date the most natural sounding flagship IEM I've heard. Where a lot of $1k+ IEMs rely on gimmicky tuning to make them sound more impressive, which comes at the cost of sacrificing timbre - the Dawn X sounds natural throughout the frequency response. Build quality is great - the stabilized wood shells are nice. Unfortunately the overall look of the IEM is contentious - the red color doesn't pop much and the AFUL branding on the earpieces is objectively a detractor - if they put Dawn-X on the earpieces, I suspect AFUL would see a huge lift in sales. Nonetheless, these are the best sounding IEMs I've tried to date.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S- Tech
Balanced, clean, airy, with a slight treble emphasis, good EST implementation, great overall package and accesories at the price. Similar to TOP PRO but with ESTs and not as vocal centric. Easy rec if you want something balanced and airy.
Youtube Video Summary

The NiceHCK Rockies have a balanced tuning with standout treble extension from its ESTs. Vocals are tamer with a cut in the upper mids, trading sparkle-forward presence for a smoother, airier presentation; staging feels more open because bass and vocals sit slightly back, while cymbal decay lingers with a pleasing airiness. Technical performance is very good for the price—punching above many $500–$600 peers—and the unboxing/accessories package adds to the overall value.

Low end is grounded and tidy rather than slammy; texture and separation are solid, but this isn’t for bassheads or those wanting vocal-forward excitement (sets like Top Pro or Volare cover that better). The Rockies excel with rock/metal/indie/classical where the extra air, layering, and controlled upper energy shine; they scale best at mid volumes, and tip rolling should avoid options that over-boost or dull the treble—the stock tips already hit a sweet spot. Net: a confident recommendation at ~$500–$600 for listeners prioritizing treble quality, detail, and spaciousness, with the main trade-off being a more restrained bass and laid-back vocal emphasis.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S- Tech
Smooth treble, natural timbre, good sub-bass focused set, but transients can be a bit soft, and vocals are pulled back lacking final extension - non-fatiguing but not very engaging and "dynamic". A bassier 5+2 with smoother/more natural treble. Reminds me of the Luna but less mid-bass/vocals, more sub, and a little smoother. Bassy all-rounder like MK4 bass switch but with pulled back vocals, and less versatile since no switch option.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized
The NiceHCK Rockies is a $500 tribrid (1DD+2BA+2EST) tuned almost identically to the Mega 5 EST but with slightly less bass and a touch more lower treble, yielding tighter bass and clearer separation at the cost of a drier, slightly brittle tone; build is solid, though the stiff, slider-less cable and average fit detract. Overall it’s good, but the warmer Mega 5 EST is preferred, and the Rockies lands at 3/5.
Youtube Video Summary

NiceHCK Rockies lands as a $500 tribrid (1DD+2BA+2EST) that mirrors the Mega5-EST’s tuning with subtle tweaks. The unboxing is generous—three styles of tips (including AET07-style and tacky “medical” silicone), a large puck case, and a swappable 3.5/4.4 screw-lock plug. Build feels premium with a real pietersite stone faceplate; fit is comfortable but shell geometry is generic, so stability depends on tips. The stock cable looks nice but is stiff and, notably, has no chin slider.

Sonically, Rockies follows a tilted diffuse-field / “new meta” balance with slightly less bass and a touch more lower-treble than Mega5-EST—on the order of ~1 dB each way. That shift tightens the low end and improves separation/imaging, making the set feel more technical; however, it also trims warmth and depth, leaving the presentation a bit dry/brittle at times. Bass quality is clean and controlled rather than showy; treble reads clear without obvious harshness on the 711 rig readout, though it can edge lean.

Against peers, Mega5-EST stays the easier, warmer listen with slightly “thuddier” bass, while DUNU’s Brain Dance is the pick for maximum excitement and staging (more clinical up top). Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk (analog use) offers stronger imaging and notably satisfying bass execution at a lower price. Rockies ends up a very good, balanced all-rounder that some will prefer over Mega5-EST for its tidier bass and clarity, but the trade for brightness and dryness is real—final verdict: 3/5.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 7* * score rescaled + normalized
Super Review says AFUL’s Dawn-X is the brand’s best execution of its house sound yet—a $1,300 flagship tribrid with 14 drivers (DD + 8 BA + 4 EST + bone conduction) that fits comfortably and consistently. The tuning is warm and bass-weighted but tight and fast, with precise, slightly assertive treble; staging isn’t very wide but has good front-to-back depth and strong clarity. Versus peers like FiiO FX17, 64 Audio U4s, Dunu Glacier, and Monarch MK4, it favors control and bass quality over maximum width or excitement; he calls it very good but evolutionary and rates it 3/5 stars.
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL’s house sound shows up here in its most polished form: Dawn-X is a tribrid (1DD + 8BA + 4EST + bone conduction) flagship at $1,300 that prioritizes consistent fit and execution over flash. Build is understated with stabilized-wood faceplates, above-average isolation, and a medium/medium-large shell that fits better—and more consistently—than the Cantor. The accessory loadout is solid (four silicone tip sets, large but well-made case), though the stock cable does not have swappable terminations (choose 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm).

Tonally, it’s a balanced, warmer-leaning take on AFUL’s signature: a dense, controlled bass that borders on decadent yet stays quick and clean, slightly relaxed mids, and a precise, mildly forward lower-treble that keeps definition high without tipping into harshness for most listeners. Stage favors front-to-back depth over width; transients are clean and a touch clinical, giving strong separation without sounding smeary. The result is a mature, confident presentation that reads refined rather than showy.

Against peers: versus Cantor, Dawn-X is warmer, smoother, and far more consistent thanks to fit; Cantor can sound brighter and a bit wider. Compared with FiiO FX17, Dawn-X has tighter bass and crisper treble, where FX17 feels looser and fuller. The 64 Audio U4s plays softer and wider; Dawn-X is more precise/clinical. DUNU Glacier hits harder and more V-shaped with smoother treble but less natural acoustic timbre; Dawn-X sounds truer on instruments. Versus ThieAudio Monarch MK4, MK4 is more neutral, vocal-forward with greater width, while Dawn-X offers denser low-end and a calmer demeanor—and a friendlier fit for many ears. Verdict: 3/5 stars—not the flashiest in its bracket, but arguably AFUL’s best execution yet of its signature sound.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7 * score rescaled + normalized
4 community members have rated the NiceHCK Rockies at an average of 3.8/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Strongly Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 9 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the AFUL DAWN-X at an average of 5.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Masterpiece.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech

The NiceHCK Rockies is a five-driver tribrid using 1DD + 2 Knowles BA + 2 Sonion EST in a resin shell with Pietersite stone faceplates. Specs list a detachable 0.78 mm 2-pin cable with swappable 3.5/4.4 mm plug, 9.8 Ω impedance and 121 dB/Vrms sensitivity, indicating easy driveability from portable sources.

Early third-party coverage characterizes the tuning as neutral with a sub-bass lift and smooth, controlled treble, with 5128 measurements available via Crinacle’s public database and a review on Hangout’s channel. These impressions emphasize strong imaging and detail without obvious harshness when recordings are clean.

At an MSRP of $499 (with a short launch price of $469), value hinges on preference for an energetic, U/neutral-with-bass presentation; listeners sensitive to upper energy may find mids a touch lean on certain material, as some impressions note. In short, Rockies trades a warm mid focus for sub-bass reach, treble resolution, and a stable stage that suits modern pop, electronic, and large-scale orchestral.


Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A Dynamics: A Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: A

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech

The AFUL Dawn-X is a 14-driver quadbrid IEM—1DD+8BA+4EST+1BC—wired together via a six-way electronic + physical crossover and AFUL’s 3D Micro-Resonance acoustic paths; the stabilized-wood shells and included 6N copper cable reinforce its flagship positioning. Specs are published at 15 Ω and 101 dB sensitivity, with an official MSRP of $1,299.99.

Early listening reports describe a balanced-to-U-shaped tuning with textured sub-bass, forward yet clean vocals, and airy treble extension; some note abundant micro-detail that can make the stage feel more intimate on certain tracks. AFUL also claims a “Wideband Electrostatic” implementation letting EST drivers contribute from ~5 kHz upward, which aligns with impressions of crisp but smooth top-end energy.

Objectively, the Dawn-X targets high technical performance—resolution, imaging precision, and treble refinement—more than aggressive coloration, which suits critical listening but may read as slightly cool on some material. Given the price bracket, value hinges on a buyer needing its specific mix of detail retrieval and composure versus similarly ambitious hybrids from rivals at or below the same MSRP.


Bass: S- Mids: A+ Treble: S- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: A+

Nicehck Rockies (more reviews)

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Fox Told Me So

Fox Told Me So 8.6 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S- Tech
NiceHCK Rockies is a tribrid (1DD + 2BA + 2EST) that rides the “golden formula” with a twist: output impedance matters—a lot. Driven from low-impedance sources, it delivers its intended tuning; from laptops or interfaces with higher Z-out, bass balloons uncontrollably. All after all, its' impedance curve isn’t flat, with higher impedance in the low frequencies. This means that if your source has a high output impedance, the bass will draw more power than other frequencies.

Tonally, Rockies follows JM1’s safe neutral-ish slope but with leaner mids and brighter treble. Bass is punchy, quick, and well-controlled; mids a touch dark but cleanly separated; and treble opens into airy, effortless EST sparkle with no sharp edges. Stage has decent depth over width, resolution solid for the price, immersive enough without grandeur.

Verdict: not flawless (could use more sub-bass reach, meatier bass, thicker mids, and wider stage), but well-executed overall. A satisfying, balanced tribrid that showcases EST treble gracefully without breaking the bank.

Fox Told Me So original ranking

Fox Told Me So Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: S- Treble: S- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S

Nicehck Rockies reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
The Mega5EST but a slight bit more technical and bright

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: S Mids: S Treble: A+

AFUL Dawn-X (more reviews)

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 9 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X goes straight for spectacle: a $1,300 tribrid behemoth with 14 drivers per side—one dynamic, eight BAs, four electrostats, and a bone conductor—that turns familiar tracks into a surreal remix. The presentation is described as “Poltergeist in an IEM,” with spatial effects that feel like a live DSP engine: four imaginary DJs slicing and reassembling the mix on the fly. Every song becomes an event—an Unreal-Engine-in-a-cave vibe—yet it stays coherent enough to be addictive rather than broken, delivering a wildly unique listen that nothing else in the collection replicates.

Forget reading the squiggle: measurements look “normal,” but the sound is anything but. The stage is huge, imaging is hyper-layered, and transient effects pop out and retract with uncanny tactility—great for ASMR, movies, and games where holographic placement sells the illusion. Despite the driver count, it’s not hard to drive; volume needs are moderate, nowhere near planar-pain territory. This is the “break-glass-when-bored” set—the one to pull out after years in the hobby when everything else feels samey and a jolt of abnormal brilliance is required.

Build and accessories match the price: gargantuan shells with stabilized wooden faceplates, a premium cable, a neat leather strap, and a buffet of individually boxed tips, though termination is a simple 3.5 or 4.4 choice. Ergonomics demand some ear real estate, but the payoff is a sound signature that’s gloriously weird and deeply entertaining. Recommendation: not a first or only IEM—save it for collectors who already have “normal” covered and want a statement piece that rewires how music feels.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S+ Tech
Balanced all-rounder with fun bass, lifelike mids, very smooth and refined treble, highly resolving and immersive, with great soundstage and precise imaging. Textured, punchy bass, natural mids, ethereal female vocals, smooth, airy, and non-fatiguing treble, top-tier resolution.
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a premium, resin-shelled flagship with a striking red-wood faceplate, a soft 4.4 mm cable, a protective zipper case, and multiple silicone tips. The shells run large but are well-contoured and vented, offering excellent comfort for extended sessions; those with smaller ears should demo first. Build and accessories are solid overall, with only some cable memory above the chin slider worth noting.

Tuning follows a mild V-shape: a moderate, textured bass lift; natural mids with lifelike vocal timbre; and a smooth, extended treble that brings air and detail without harshness. Kicks have weight and EDM carries rumble, yet vocals remain clear; male voices retain grit without thickness, while female vocals sound airy and sweet. Treble presents shimmer and clarity in a non-fatiguing way—ideal for long listens, though not for fans of aggressively boosted highs or outright bass-head needs.

Technical performance is a highlight: resolution, separation, imaging, and stage depth rank among the best at the price, creating immersive layering and precise placement even on busy tracks. Versus AFUL Caner, Dawn-X offers stronger, tighter bass, smoother treble, better comfort, and more refined layering; compared to FiiO’s FX17 and BGVP Solomon, it sounds cleaner, more naturally voiced, and less fatiguing. Against Elleian Apostle, the Apostle hits harder down low, while Dawn-X feels more balanced and immersive. Recommended for those who want a fun-yet-natural, all-rounder flagship with effortless treble and textured mids—less so for meta-leaning bright V tunings or very small ears. Final verdict: 4.5/5, a top contender at its price.


Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 9 Reviewer Score
S+ Tuning
S+ Tech
Rating: S+ | Value: ⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮🎮 | Comfort: 6 natural midrange. ethereal treble. totl techs. rip small ears
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a 12-driver quad-brid flagship (1 DD, 8 BA, 4 EST, 1 bone conduction) priced at $1,300. The unboxing mirrors AFUL’s higher-end sets: big leather case, cable clip, four ear-tip sets, cleaning brush, plus a soft but slightly memory-prone cable available in 3.5 or 4.4—and given the set’s power hunger, 4.4 makes sense. Design skews conservative: a red stabilized-wood faceplate paired with a plain black shell that doesn’t showcase the intricate internals. The shell is also very large (think Monarch-sized), creating comfort issues; small ears will struggle. Tip sensitivity is high, and stock tips provide the most balanced result.

Tonally this is classic AFUL house sound: a mild V with a slightly warm, musical tilt that remains balanced overall. Bass hits with punch, texture, and sub-bass rumble without bloat—ample enough for bass fans yet controlled. The midrange is a standout: natural, lush vocals with male voices gaining a touch from the warmth and female vocals kept more neutral, preserving timbral authenticity and emotional nuance. Treble is rich, smooth, and well-extended; the ESTs are tuned tastefully—no harsh glare—adding just the right air and sparkle. The bone-conduction driver focuses on mids and stays subtle in practice.

Technically, Dawn-X competes with top peers: high resolution, excellent separation, and rare cohesion for a multi-driver design. Imaging and layering feel strikingly realistic, while stage favors depth over width (wider sets like Fatfreq Quantum still outspread it). As a recommendation, it suits listeners seeking a slightly warm, highly detailed, all-rounder; it’s not ideal for small ears, lean-bass preferences, or those wanting brighter upper-mids/treble. Despite strong diminishing returns above mid-fi prices, Dawn-X punches above its tag and earns a rare two-star recommendation from Kois Archive—a flagship that feels genuinely special if the fit works.


Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Nicehck Rockies User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 2 user reviews

9

Outstanding

AFUL Dawn-X User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Nicehck Rockies Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.2

Gaming Grade

A+

AFUL Dawn-X Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.1

Gaming Grade

A+

Nicehck Rockies Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • A masterfully balanced signature renders music effortlessly realistic and emotionally engaging. Nuanced mixes benefit from its balance.

Average Technical Grade

S-
  • A very capable technical display delivers articulate layers and poised imaging. It portrays reverbs and echoes with confidence.
Bass A+
It delivers flagship-worthy bass, rich in both rumble and nuance. Reference tracks showcase its grip.
Mids S-
Expect an immersive mid band where every vocal inflection and texture shines. Complex arrangements stay perfectly composed.
Treble A+
Treble reaches superb heights, offering effortless extension and crystal clarity. Every cymbal crash resolves into fine mist.
Dynamics A
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage A+
It crafts a floating sphere of sound where directional cues shimmer with precision. Layering remains stable even when pushed.
Details A+
The tiniest inflections pop into view as if spotlit within the mix. Low-level details feel magnified yet natural.
Imaging A+
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Good value for serious gaming performance.

AFUL Dawn-X Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Tonal balance reaches a highly refined state, sounding seamless from lows to highs. Everything locks together with satisfying coherence.

Average Technical Grade

S
  • Expect an effortlessly clean presentation that keeps complex mixes perfectly organized. There is zero sense of congestion even at high volume.
Bass S-
Expect a gripping low-end presence that marries clarity with visceral impact. Dynamic swings land with thrilling force.
Mids S-
The midrange sounds refined and revealing, balancing clarity with emotional weight. Timbre accuracy rivals studio monitors.
Treble S-
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics A
The system snaps into action with precision, highlighting every swell. Recordings feel energetic and alive.
Soundstage S-
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Details S-
No subtlety is too small; the presentation exposes it all with composure. Complex tracks remain crystal clear.
Imaging A+
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Premium pricing warrants consideration of gaming-first alternatives for lower cost

Nicehck Rockies User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
W WTW3
9.5

A lively rendition of the diffuse field tuning that tilts slightly upward for additional clarity. Tastefully bass-boosted DD, clear and clean BA mids with slightly recessed vocals, and standout EST treble presence make an engaging JM-1 all-rounder.

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: S Mids: S Treble: S+ Dynamics: S- Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S
Pros
Lively, unique take on neutral with bass boost. Excellent detail.
Cons
An ever so slight increase in bass shelf could provide more dynamicism.
Z Zale
8.4

Lively tribrid with engaging low end and airy detail that still sounds cohesive. Strong technical performance for the price without losing musicality.

Tuning: A+ Tech: S- Bass: S- Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: S- Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S-
Pros
Punchy, fast bass with good texture and sub-bass reach. Smooth-leaning EST treble with high detail and precise imaging; comfortable fit and solid isolation.
Cons
V-shaped balance leaves mids a bit recessed. Treble can lean bright on poor recordings.

AFUL Dawn-X User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer