Periodic Audio Ti VS EPZ P50

Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Periodic Audio Ti Aggregated Review Score

Periodic Audio Ti Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

1.2

Negative

EPZ P50 Aggregated Review Score

EPZ P50 Average Reviewer Scores

Gizaudio Axel
Jays Audio Jaytiss Tim Tuned
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7

Generally Favorable

Periodic Audio Ti User Review Score

Periodic Audio Ti Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EPZ P50 User Review Score

EPZ P50 Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

9.5

Overwhelmingly Positive

Periodic Audio Ti Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.2

Gaming Grade

E-

EPZ P50 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.3

Gaming Grade

A-

Periodic Audio Ti Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass E+
Noticeably thin bass presence. Lacks body and texture, leaving low frequencies feeling hollow and underdeveloped.
Mids E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble E-
Treble is extremely rolled off and veiled. High frequencies are barely perceptible with significant loss of detail.
Dynamics E-
Extremely poor dynamic expression. Lacks any sense of impact or volume gradation, making music feel one-dimensional.
Details E-
Extremely poor resolution. Fine details are completely lost, leaving only a vague impression of the music's structure.
Imaging E-
Extremely vague imaging with no localization. All elements seem to originate from a single undefined point in space.
Gaming E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

EPZ P50 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Competent tonal approach with minor technical flaws. Noticeable but not distracting quirks. Decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Above average technicalities. Handles separation and detail adequately in simpler tracks, but complex passages remain challenging. Soundstage is modestly sized with acceptable imaging.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids S-
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A+
Superb treble: effortless extension with crystal clarity. Perfect balance of sparkle and smoothness with exceptional detail.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations.

Periodic Audio Ti Reviews

Periodic Audio Ti reviewed by:

Precogvision 1.2 Reviewer Score
E Tuning
E- Tech
Wait, this is the intended sound? My unit isn't just broken? Yiiikes.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: E+ Mids: E+ Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Details: E- Imaging: E-

EPZ P50 Reviews

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Clean balanced tuning done right. A better tuned MEGA5EST & MOONDROP Meteor with fuller low-end, and more treble extension, same tech, but more dynamic - also half the price. A Mega5EST with better vocals and dynamics but less smooth and airy. Low-end will be weak to some people and on certain tracks. Not the most unique sound since it's clean/neutral/balanced.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio
Using this affiliate link for ordering your EPZ P50 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $260

Buy EPZ P50 on Aliexpress

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Gizaudio Axel 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
For me this has some oddities. It would be higher if those weren't there.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: A+

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Pros: Beautifully done tuning all around. Cons: Nitpick: Bass dynamic could be better.

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: A+

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Bass can be a little bit on the distracting side if you are looking for a neutral sound signature. Contrasty meta-tuning.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review

Periodic Audio Ti User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!

EPZ P50 User Reviews

yorxx 2025-07-11 16:52:45
9.5

Killabuck.

Pros
No roughness, Natural timbre, Balanced signature, good note density, Very good consistency, comfortable to use, Good cable, Technically amazing, good accessories, good tips, good transparency, good brightness, tactile bass, not much warmth, nice voices.
Cons
None.

Footer