qdc White Tiger VS 64 Audio U4s

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

qdc White Tiger and 64 Audio U4s use 6BA+2EST and 1DD+3BA driver setups respectively. qdc White Tiger costs $1,500 while 64 Audio U4s costs $1,100. qdc White Tiger is $400 more expensive. 64 Audio U4s holds a clear 0.9-point edge in reviewer scores (7.2 vs 8.1). 64 Audio U4s has significantly better bass with a 1-point edge, qdc White Tiger has better mids with a 0.7-point edge, qdc White Tiger has better treble with a 0.7-point edge, qdc White Tiger has significantly better soundstage with a 2.5-point edge, qdc White Tiger has slightly better details with a 0.3-point edge and qdc White Tiger has better imaging with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric qdc White Tiger 64 Audio U4s
Bass 7 8
Mids 8.5 7.8
Treble 7.5 6.8
Details 7.5 7.3
Soundstage 8.5 6
Imaging 8 7.5
Dynamics 7.2 7.7
Gaming capabilities 6.6 6.1

qdc White Tiger Aggregated Review Score

qdc White Tiger Average Reviewer Scores

Crin
Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable


64 Audio U4s Aggregated Review Score

64 Audio U4s Average Reviewer Scores

Smirk Audio Jaytiss Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

8.1

Very Positive


qdc White Tiger User Review Score

qdc White Tiger Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio U4s User Review Score

64 Audio U4s Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

qdc White Tiger Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

64 Audio U4s Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

qdc White Tiger Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids S-
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Soundstage S-
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Details A
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A+
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision. Creates a palpable sense of physical placement with perfect positional stability.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio U4s Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B+
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

qdc White Tiger Reviews

qdc White Tiger reviewed by:

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

qdc White Tiger reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Midrange focused, niche tuning that does not sacrifice too much on clarity and ease of listening Subbass roll off, has the softest presentation within the entire upper 25%

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: A- Mids: S- Treble: A Soundstage: S- Details: A Imaging: A+

64 Audio U4s Reviews

64 Audio U4s reviewed by:

Smirk Audio 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
A tastefully colored U12t with a more intimate soundstage, a cutback in technicalities, and more bass realism.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

- Smirk Audio
Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: A Imaging: A+

64 Audio U4s reviewed by:

Super* Review 9* * score normalized

64 Audio U4s reviewed by:

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It's a solid set, with great build quality, but sonically isn't the specialist that I want it to be.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: A+ Treble: B Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B

64 Audio U4s reviewed by:

Precogvision 7.7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Fantastic colored tonality with options, and the unique technical qualities to back it up. M12/M15 modules recommended.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

qdc White Tiger User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio U4s User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer