QX-over VS CCA Phoenix

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

QX-over and CCA Phoenix are in-ear monitors. QX-over costs $30 while CCA Phoenix costs $29. QX-over is $1 more expensive. CCA Phoenix holds a decisive 5.3-point edge in reviewer scores (1.3 vs 6.6). CCA Phoenix has significantly better mids with a 4-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better treble with a 5-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better dynamics with a 4-point edge and CCA Phoenix has significantly better soundstage with a 4.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric QX-over CCA Phoenix
Mids 1 5
Treble 1 6
Soundstage 2 6.5
Dynamics 1 5
Tonality 1.3 5.6
Technicalities 1 6
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough QX-over and CCA Phoenix reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

QX-over Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

1.3

Abysmal

CCA Phoenix Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6.6

Cautiously Favorable

Reviews Comparison

QX-over reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 1.3 Reviewer Score
E- Tuning
E- Tech
Gets better with the right settings, but not enough.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: E- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: E+

CCA Phoenix reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-10-11
Jaytiss 6.6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B Tech
It's a nice easy set, fun and enjoyable.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B+
YouTube video thumbnail

QX-over User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

CCA Phoenix User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

QX-over Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.1

Gaming Grade

E-

CCA Phoenix Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

QX-over Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E-
  • Expect a discordant presentation where frequency clashes ruin any chance of relaxed listening. It struggles to render a cohesive musical picture.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Instrument separation collapses instantly, burying nuances and leaving everything in a gray blur. Layered arrangements collapse into a messy haze.
Mids E-
Expect vocals to feel buried, with midrange detail swallowed by haze. You'll keep raising the volume to compensate.
Treble E-
Upper frequencies retreat, causing detail and brilliance to disappear. You may think your source is covered.
Dynamics E-
Dynamic expression is extremely poor, draining impact from every hit. Notes lack the startle or decay they need.
Soundstage E+
Limited spatial presentation with minimal width, leaving instruments clumped together without depth. Stage width barely extends past the ears.
Gaming E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

CCA Phoenix Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B+
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

QX-over User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

CCA Phoenix User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer