Moondrop Crescent VS QX-over

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Moondrop Crescent and QX-over are in-ear monitors. Moondrop Crescent costs $30 while QX-over costs $30. Moondrop Crescent holds a decisive 5-point edge in reviewer scores (6.3 vs 1.3).

Insights

Metric Moondrop Crescent QX-over
Mids 6.3 1
Treble 6.3 1
Soundstage 6.3 2
Dynamics 6.3 1
Tonality 7 1.3
Technicalities 5.8 1
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Moondrop Crescent and QX-over reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Moondrop Crescent Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive


QX-over Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

1.3

Abysmal


Reviews Comparison

Moondrop Crescent (more reviews)

Moondrop Crescent reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized

Moondrop Crescent reviewed by Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
C+ Tech
Well-executed V-ish signature that's neither harsh nor bloated.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Moondrop Crescent reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech

The Moondrop Crescent features a distinctive brass housing that gives it premium heft but also makes it notably heavy, potentially affecting comfort during extended wear. Its non-detachable cable and basic accessories—including subpar stock eartips that often require replacement—highlight cost-cutting compromises. Isolation is mediocre due to vented designs, though build quality otherwise feels robust for the price.

Sonically, the Crescent adheres closely to the Harman target response, delivering a balanced signature with a slight bass boost that avoids bloat while maintaining textured lows. Its midrange leans transparent but can thin male vocals, and treble extends cleanly without harshness, though upper-mids occasionally verge on shouty. Technical performance impresses for its tier, with strong imaging and a wide soundstage, though detail retrieval lags behind pricier hybrids.

Discontinued and increasingly hard to find, the Crescent remains a value standout for its natural timbre and cohesive tuning, outperforming many peers under $50. Its need for aftermarket tips and amplification to maximize potential are notable drawbacks, but it retains cult appeal for its musicality.


QX-over (more reviews)

QX-over reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 1.3 Reviewer Score
E- Tuning
E- Tech
Gets better with the right settings, but not enough.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: E- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: E+

Moondrop Crescent User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

QX-over User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Moondrop Crescent Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

QX-over Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.1

Gaming Grade

E-

Moondrop Crescent Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • The tonal character feels settled and versatile, with just a few gentle bumps. You can listen for hours without fatigue.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

QX-over Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E-
  • Expect a discordant presentation where frequency clashes ruin any chance of relaxed listening. It struggles to render a cohesive musical picture.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Instrument separation collapses instantly, burying nuances and leaving everything in a gray blur. Layered arrangements collapse into a messy haze.
Mids E-
Expect vocals to feel buried, with midrange detail swallowed by haze. You'll keep raising the volume to compensate.
Treble E-
Upper frequencies retreat, causing detail and brilliance to disappear. You may think your source is covered.
Dynamics E-
Dynamic expression is extremely poor, draining impact from every hit. Notes lack the startle or decay they need.
Soundstage E+
Limited spatial presentation with minimal width, leaving instruments clumped together without depth. Stage width barely extends past the ears.
Gaming E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Moondrop Crescent User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

QX-over User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer