Raycon E25 VS Simgot EW300

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Raycon E25 and Simgot EW300 are in-ear monitors. Raycon E25 costs $80 while Simgot EW300 costs $69. Raycon E25 is $11 more expensive. Simgot EW300 holds a decisive 4-point edge in reviewer scores (2.5 vs 6.5).

Insights

Metric Raycon E25 Simgot EW300
Tonality 2.5 7.4
Technicalities 3.5 6.9
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Raycon E25 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Raycon E25 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

2.5

Very Negative


Simgot EW300 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.5

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

Raycon E25 (more reviews)

Raycon E25 reviewed by Crin

Crin 2.5 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
D+ Tech
It's a lot of bass. A ridiculous amount of bass. Bloated, muddy and piercing all at the same time.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Simgot EW300 (more reviews)

Simgot EW300 reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 6.4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
Rating: B | Value: ⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮 | Comfort: 9 good bass and solid overall mid and treble is not the best

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Simgot EW300 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $79.99

Buy Simgot EW300 on Linsoul

Simgot EW300 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
A smoother and more refined version of the EW200 with better layering and resolution bump. Pink nozzle is warmer and better for rock/hiphop/metal. Very good piezo implementation.
Youtube Video Summary

The Simgot EW300 positions itself as a standout under $80, acting as a direct upgrade to the EW200 with more refined tuning and an uptick in layering/resolution. With the red 3.5 mm nozzle, the presentation is a dynamic, all-rounder tilt: upper-mids/treble are smoother and less peaky yet remain well-extended, vocals “pop” naturally, and separation feels tidier. In comparisons, the EA500 LM carries higher raw detail and a brighter, more exciting edge, but EW300’s calmer balance makes for longer, less fatiguing sessions and genuinely trades blows on preference.

Swapping to the pink nozzle shifts the EW300 into a warmer, bassier, and more laid-back profile with added thickness down low and a tamed 1–3 kHz region that helps vocal comfort and cuts fatigue. It suits rock, hip-hop, and metal while maintaining clean midrange boundaries, improved instrument separation, and a generally relaxing tone. Against similarly priced planars, the analog EW300 sounds less “sizzly” in timbre while holding its own on separation; owners of the original EA500 shouldn’t expect a huge jump here—the bigger step up remains the LM for sheer resolution.

The DSP version skews more vocal-focused and “clean balanced,” sacrificing some analog punch for smoothness and control. A deliberate 5–10 kHz softening plus a 13 kHz accent keeps consonants gentler and overall non-fatiguing, though some may find end-notes a touch too polite; the pink DSP profile further tames vocals while still giving satisfying cymbal crash. Practicalities are strong: the integrated DAC path shows a low noise floor with no odd artifacts on volume changes, and latency is a non-issue; for gaming, the analog 3.5 mm still images slightly better. Net: pick analog for slam and energy, or DSP for a smooth, vocal-centric clarity—either way, the EW300 offers real flexibility and polish at its price.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Simgot EW300 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 5.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B- Tech

Simgot EW300 reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Youtube Video Summary

Simgot EW300 makes a strong case as a sub-$80 tribrid benchmark, bringing a more natural timbre, better layering, and a small bump in resolution over EW200. With the red 3.5 mm nozzles, tuning is a lively all-rounder: punchy low end, smoother upper-mids/treble with fewer peaks, and vocals that pop without glare—essentially a more refined, less shouty evolution of EW200. Swap to the pink nozzles and the signature shifts warmer and bassier, taming 1–3 kHz for thicker body and reduced fatigue—great for rock, hip-hop, and metal—while keeping separation clean and the midrange free of bleed.

The DSP version pivots toward a clean, vocal-focused balance: extended yet smooth, effortless vocals, and low fatigue. A deliberate 5–10 kHz dip plus an airy upper push trades some bite for longer listening comfort; the pink DSP nozzle dials vocals even calmer while keeping cymbal crashes satisfying. Implementation quality stands out: a dedicated DAC section yields a low noise floor with no volume-change artifacts, and latency stays in check. For gaming and microdetail, the analog 3.5 mm edges ahead with slightly better imaging and resolution.

Against peers, EW300 trades blows with the EA500 LM—LM chases raw resolution with a brighter, more exciting tilt, whereas EW300 sounds smoother and easier for long sessions (OG EA500 owners won’t see a big upgrade, though layering/separation are a touch better). Versus other sub-$100 sets and entry-level planars, EW300’s timbre is less sizzly yet remains technically competent, and the two-nozzle system effectively gives two tunings in one. Taken together—analog punch, DSP polish, and genuine tuning flexibility—EW300 positions itself as a new value benchmark in its price class.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

Simgot EW300 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.9 * score rescaled + normalized
40 community members have rated the Simgot EW300 at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Simgot EW300 reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech

The Simgot EW300 offers a compelling tribrid driver configuration combining a 10mm dynamic driver, 6mm planar magnetic driver, and piezoelectric ceramic driver in a durable all-metal shell. Fit can be divisive due to the shorter nozzles, requiring tip experimentation for optimal seal, but the included detachable tuning nozzles (silver and gold) enable noticeable sound adjustments. The default silver nozzle delivers a balanced profile with punchy, well-controlled bass, a natural midrange favoring vocals, and treble that avoids excessive harshness despite occasional timbral quirks from the planar driver.

Swapping to the gold nozzle boosts bass warmth and smooths treble, aligning closer to a Harman-inspired tuning, which enhances positional audio clarity for gaming. Technical performance is solid for the price, with good detail retrieval and soundstage width, though complex tracks can expose minor congestion in layering. The occasional timbral unevenness in upper frequencies and sparse accessories are trade-offs, but the EW300’s cohesive tuning versatility across genres and activities makes it an exceptional value in its class.


Raycon E25 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Simgot EW300 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Raycon E25 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.2

Gaming Grade

D

Simgot EW300 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

Raycon E25 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • Expect a discordant presentation where frequency clashes ruin any chance of relaxed listening. It struggles to render a cohesive musical picture.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Textural information blurs together, making the stage feel pinched and gray. Instrument edges blur together frequently.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Simgot EW300 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • A smooth, agreeable balance keeps the presentation engaging without obvious flaws. Only sensitive ears will nitpick the bumps.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

Raycon E25 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Simgot EW300 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer