Samsung Buds Pro VS EPZ P50

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Samsung Buds Pro and EPZ P50 use 2DD and 1DD+2BA+2Planar driver setups respectively. Samsung Buds Pro costs $180 while EPZ P50 costs $189. EPZ P50 is $9 more expensive. EPZ P50 holds a decisive 3.5-point edge in reviewer scores (3.5 vs 7). EPZ P50 carries a user score of 9.5. EPZ P50 has significantly better bass with a 4-point edge, EPZ P50 has significantly better mids with a 4-point edge and EPZ P50 has significantly better treble with a 3.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Samsung Buds Pro EPZ P50
Bass 4 8
Mids 4 8
Treble 4 7.5
Details 3 7
Soundstage 3.5 7
Imaging 3 7
Dynamics 3.5 5
Gaming capabilities 3.3 7

Samsung Buds Pro Aggregated Review Score

Samsung Buds Pro Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Poor


EPZ P50 Aggregated Review Score

EPZ P50 Average Reviewer Scores

Gizaudio Axel
Jays Audio Tim Tuned Jaytiss
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7

Generally Favorable


Samsung Buds Pro User Review Score

Samsung Buds Pro Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EPZ P50 User Review Score

EPZ P50 Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

9.5

Exceptional

Samsung Buds Pro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.3

Gaming Grade

D

EPZ P50 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

Samsung Buds Pro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

EPZ P50 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations.

Samsung Buds Pro Reviews

Samsung Buds Pro reviewed by:

Nymz 3.5 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
D Tech
Great stock tuning, but slight warmer than I'd like. Techs are actually fine. ANC is good. Lack of custom EQ makes me cry.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: C- Details: D Imaging: D

EPZ P50 Reviews

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Bass can be a little bit on the distracting side if you are looking for a neutral sound signature. Contrasty meta-tuning.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your EPZ P50 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $260

Buy EPZ P50 on Aliexpress

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Clean balanced tuning done right. A better tuned MEGA5EST & MOONDROP Meteor with fuller low-end, and more treble extension, same tech, but more dynamic - also half the price. A Mega5EST with better vocals and dynamics but less smooth and airy. Low-end will be weak to some people and on certain tracks. Not the most unique sound since it's clean/neutral/balanced.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Beautifully done tuning all around Nitpick: Bass dynamic could be better

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: A+

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
For me this has some oddities. It would be higher if those weren't there.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Gizaudio Axel 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel

Samsung Buds Pro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

EPZ P50 User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
yorxx 2025-07-11 16:52:45
9.5

Killabuck.

Pros
No roughness, Natural timbre, Balanced signature, good note density, Very good consistency, comfortable to use, Good cable, Technically amazing, good accessories, good tips, good transparency, good brightness, tactile bass, not much warmth, nice voices.
Cons
None.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer