Samsung Buds2 Pro and FATfreq x HBB Deuce are 2DD in-ear monitors. Samsung Buds2 Pro costs $230 while FATfreq x HBB Deuce costs $239. FATfreq x HBB Deuce is $9 more expensive. FATfreq x HBB Deuce holds a decisive 3.1-point edge in reviewer scores (4 vs 7.1). FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge.
Insights
Metric | Samsung Buds2 Pro | FATfreq x HBB Deuce |
---|---|---|
Bass | 5 | 7.1 |
Mids | 4 | 6 |
Treble | 5 | 5 |
Details | 3 | 7.1 |
Soundstage | 4 | 6 |
Imaging | 3 | 7.1 |
Dynamics | 4 | 6 |
Gaming capabilities | 3.7 | 6.1 |
Samsung Buds2 Pro Aggregated Review Score
Samsung Buds2 Pro Average Reviewer Scores
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Aggregated Review Score
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Average Reviewer Scores
Samsung Buds2 Pro Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $230
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $239
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Samsung Buds2 Pro User Review Score
Samsung Buds2 Pro Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Review Score
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Samsung Buds2 Pro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.7Gaming Grade
D+FATfreq x HBB Deuce Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.1Gaming Grade
BSamsung Buds2 Pro Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Samsung Buds2 Pro Reviews
Samsung Buds2 Pro reviewed by: Nymz
My current EDC. Good bass and treble, especially for a TWS, but ever-so-slightly hot in the upper-mid range à la Harman. Sounds slightly better with ANC off.
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Reviews
FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by: Z-Reviews
FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by: Super* Review
This is not my usual sound signature which I like. But it's a lot of fun in a unique way. One-trick pony.Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by: Jays Audio
The defacto basshead rec before the more expensive stuff. Super fun sub-bass, textured, heavy, prolonged decay for more reverb in the bass, well-balanced as well, smooth and scales great. Tech is not its strong point, and DON'T buy from FatFreq directly!!! Jays Audio Youtube Channel
FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by: Jaytiss
Hits Hard, and is super fun. Suprisingly great mids. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Samsung Buds2 Pro User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFATfreq x HBB Deuce User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review