Sennheiser IE600 VS Softears Volume S

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Sennheiser IE600 and Softears Volume S use 1DD and 2DD+2BA driver setups respectively. Sennheiser IE600 costs $700 while Softears Volume S costs $320. Sennheiser IE600 is $380 more expensive. Softears Volume S holds a slight 0.3-point edge in reviewer scores (7.5 vs 7.7). Softears Volume S carries a user score of 8.2. Softears Volume S has better bass with a 0.7-point edge, Softears Volume S has significantly better mids with a 1.1-point edge, Softears Volume S has better treble with a 0.9-point edge and Sennheiser IE600 has slightly better details with a 0.4-point edge.

Insights

Metric Sennheiser IE600 Softears Volume S
Bass 7.3 8
Mids 6.5 7.6
Treble 6.4 7.3
Details 7 6.7
Soundstage 7.3 7.4
Imaging 6.5 6.5
Dynamics 6.5 6.4
Tonality 6.9 7.8
Technicalities 7.3 7.4

Sennheiser IE600 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.5

Generally Favorable


Softears Volume S Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.7

Strongly Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

$700 buys a compact, 3D-printed metal single-DD that looks mature and fits like a glove. The IE 600 arrives with two cables (3.5mm and 4.4mm) that are thin and comfy but a bit microphonic thanks to stiff, moldable ear hooks. Connectivity is MMCX, yet Sennheiser’s slightly non-standard recess limits third-party cable options. Isolation is a touch below average, but the tiny shells seat past the tragus, stay secure, and even work as a sleeping IEM. The real facepalm is the stock tips—especially the silicone set with collapsing walls. Foam tips are usable (and subtly affect treble), but the easiest fix is Final E-type tips, which keep the incisiveness while curbing sibilance better than Moondrop Spring Tips.

Tonally, think tasteful V-shape: a sub-bass-weighted low end with just enough mid-bass wallop for body, natural and appropriately forward mids, and spicy, well-extended treble. The draw is the technical ride—top-to-bottom texture, punch, and an almost visceral snap. Bass is a standout: deep, delineated rumble that doesn’t smear the mids yet feels physical on everything from EDM to Fleetwood Mac. Treble gives cymbals real weight and timbre (a spot where many sets thin out), while stage is bigger than average with solid imaging—cohesive rather than gimmicky holography. Compared side-by-side, it’s bolder and more contrasty than a warm-neutral Zen Pro, and far more physical than the airy, sterile-leaning Moondrop S8, yet it keeps vocals clean and convincing.

Quibbles exist—awful stock tips, a touch of treble bite depending on fit, and that picky MMCX—but the core experience is special. With a quick tip swap, IE 600 delivers endgame-within-reach performance: exhilarating bass quality, incisive treble, natural mids, comfort for hours, and virtually no deal-breaking caveats. At $700 it’s not cheap, but it competes fearlessly with far pricier IEMs and feels like a set to buy once and be done.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Sennheiser IE600 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $699

Buy Sennheiser IE600 on HiFiGO

Softears Volume S reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8.5* * score rescaled + normalized
Fantastic IEM for the price. Super sharp and standout bass physicality. Tonality is more universal than the Dusk. It's well defined but not super wide or spacious
Youtube Video Summary

The Softears Volume S at $320 sets a new tonal benchmark for IEMs in its price range. It arrives in solid packaging featuring a zippered carry case (a bit large but functional), protective earpiece pockets that might feel overkill for some, and two excellent sets of ear tips – including Softears' own highly-regarded Ultra Clear tips. Build quality is generally fantastic, highlighted by a resin shell, a comfortable paracord-style cable with a low-profile, user-swappable termination system, and recessed 2-pin connectors. While the aesthetics might feel a bit old-school to some, the fit is comfortable and stable due to its semi-custom shape and longer nozzle, making it secure enough for sleeping. A small screwdriver-adjustable tuning switch offers a secondary, brighter Harmon-like sound signature, though the default tuning is preferred.

The default sound signature is a warm-tilted neutral, delivering exceptional natural timbre and tasteful bass boost. This bass stands out for its exceptional physicality – punchy and impactful without being overbearing – alongside articulate sub-bass that’s easy to follow. Combined with well-defined transients, particularly in the upper-midrange, it creates a satisfyingly rich and dense presentation. While spatial effects and imaging are competent but not standout, the overall tonality and bass quality are remarkably refined. Comparisons show it offers a better tonal balance and bass control than the bassier Dunu DaVinci, significantly more body and richness than the brighter, thinner Moondrop Blessing 3, and trades blows with the Moondrop Dusk – the Volume S providing superior density and mid-bass presence versus the Dusk's more open, spacious presentation.

Ultimately, the Softears Volume S earns a full five-star rating. It might not be the absolute most technically dazzling IEM, but its fantastic tonal balance, unique bass physicality, and overall refinement make it a compelling choice. For $320, it delivers a sound signature that feels just right – rich, satisfying, and universally appealing – challenging more expensive offerings and establishing itself as a top contender in its class.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears Volume S or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $290

Buy Softears Volume S on HiFiGO

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 7.5 Reviewer Score
Engaging sound signature with authoritative bass and very good treble. Mids are no slouch either. Can be spicy for some, but for what it's worth, I have no issues with the treble. Pretty impressive, not just for single DDs but for any driver config.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Softears Volume S reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8 Reviewer Score
Natural, rich sounding. Substantial low end that doesn't muddy up the mix and a bass shelf that isn't completely isolated to the subbass (when an IEM has a lot of subbass but no midbass, this can makes it sound like it has a hole in the frequency response). Bass hits are very physical and yet not overpowering. Natural sounding mids and natural sounding timbre across the board. Treble that does not fatigue. All this for less than $400. It likely won't knock your proverbial socks off with techs but it also doesn't lack detail. Excellent dynamics. Transient attack is crisp. Imaging and stage is good. This IEM is one I can listen to for hours on end without getting tired of it - it skews towards warm and relaxing but not boring. The only thing that this might lack compared to other comparable IEMs is perhaps some upper treble extension which might help to add a bit more air and sparkle - but doing so could possibly ruin the laid-back and approachable character that sets this IEM apart and keeps me from wanting to grab any other IEM.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Tons of detail and amazing clarity. Stage is smaller than most IEMs at/below its price tag but very well defined details and imaging within that space. Bass is detailed, but amount is not as much as graph would suggest. Treble gets sharp and fatiguing at longer-listening/higher volumes. Stage can feel cramped.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Softears Volume S reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A Tech
Amazing vocals under $500 with the stock switch/clear tips or tangzu sancai regular (no impedance boost) with amazing vocal scaling. Recommended for higher volume listening like ballads, slower indie/bands. Better than Studio 4 vocal wise, but Studio 4 is the better all-rounder. Volume S is more mid/vocal centric than Studio 4, and more immersive and "musical". Other switch configuration offers more clarity and detail at the cost of scaling with uppermids/treble boost (cleaner harman 2019/better at mid-volume). Stock switch tuning can also be neutral and relaxing if you don't crank it up, and overall Volume S has good variety and differentiates itself with the different tunings. Also, well implemented BAs. Passive Radiator effect is questionable.
Youtube Video Summary

The Softears Volume S emerges as a standout vocal specialist under $500, often described as a "mini studio 4“ due to similar frequency graphs. However, it trades some treble detail for superior scaling and a heightened focus on the mid-range, particularly vocals, while adding a touch more mid-bass oomph. This treble reduction allows the music to breathe, creating a more immersive and musical experience that pulls the listener deeper into the sound compared to the Studio 4, without sacrificing a sense of space or leaving the bass and treble feeling inadequate. Though not bass-heavy or treble-head oriented, the low-end provides enough thump and the highs enough air to avoid sounding lean or dark, resulting in a presentation that's slightly less technical and balanced than the Studio 4 but excels in vocal delivery and engagement.

A key feature is the tuning switch which boosts upper mids and treble while lowering the bass, effectively transforming the sound into a cleaner, more technical version of Harman 2019, even surpassing the Studio 4 in detail retrieval in this mode. However, this boosted configuration can sound shouty, lean, and overly clinical for many preferences, lacking the thickness of the stock tuning and scaling less effectively at higher volumes. The stock tuning, preferred for its vocal prowess, truly comes alive with increased volume. The included clear tips are recommended for a slight treble lift and comfort, and the bundled USBC adapter adds a subtle amount of sub-bass rumble, though the low-end remains clean and controlled, reminiscent of leaner sets like the Pilgrim, not providing heavy slam.

While the Studio 4 remains a solid, well-balanced all-rounder, especially on sale around $350, and alternatives like the EM10 (more detailed), Supermix 4 (better value), the Volume S carves its niche with exceptional vocal performance at higher volumes using the stock tuning. Its main drawbacks involve the confusing switch design (requiring opposite positions on each earpiece for the same tuning with no clear indicators) and the pricing debate; using non-branded drivers suggests a more appropriate price point would be $200-$250 rather than $300. Despite these quirks and marketing claims about the passive radiator's role (its actual impact being debatable), the Volume S delivers a great sounding, flexible IEM offering distinct sonic profiles based on volume level and switch position.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S Tech
Very well rouned fun subbass focus sound Treble might be too much
Youtube Video Summary

Sennheiser IE600 hits with a confidently V-shaped signature: powerful yet tidy bass that thumps with dynamic-driver slam, a flat, clean lower midrange, and lively upper mids that make vocals and instruments pop. Timbre is notably natural—free from plasticky glare—and the treble pushes plenty of sparkle and micro-nuance without tipping into sibilance or fatigue for most listeners. The result is an energetic yet slightly analytical listen, where details jump out, separation stays intact, and the stage opens up with convincing width and a sense of air. Imaging shows near-pinpoint placement with real depth, contributing to a presentation that feels both exciting and controlled.

In A/Bs, IE600 trades blows with mid-fi favorites: versus Moondrop Variations, the Sennheiser is the more resolving and a touch more natural in timbre (Variations projects a wider stage and leans cleaner/U-shaped). Against DUNU SA6, SA6 offers the safer, more reference-leaning tuning, but IE600 pulls ahead on detail, note definition, and stage size. Compared with Thieaudio Oracle, Oracle stays truer-neutral, yet IE600 flexes stronger technical performance—the kind usually reserved for pricier sets, rivaling classics like Clairvoyance and Monarch Mk1. The catch is treble quantity: those sensitive to extra top-end bite may find it a bit much. Everyone else gets a compact, feather-light shell with outstanding comfort, a richly textured low end, vivid mids, and class-leading detail under $1,000—an easy recommendation if an energetic treble tilt fits the taste.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel

Softears Volume S reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
Bass surprisingly addicting and tactile midrange could be more natural
Youtube Video Summary

The Softears Volume S delivers a distinctly colored sound signature with significant boosts in two key areas: the bass and the upper mid-range. Its bass profile is uniquely elevated up to around 300Hz, resulting in a physical, heavy, yet well-defined low end that impresses with substantial note weight and attack, appealing even to bass enthusiasts. Vocals cut through clearly due to the upper mid-range boost, but this tuning comes with a trade-off: a noticeable sense of hollowness and a narrower soundstage that can feel congested on certain tracks, creating a love-hate relationship with its presentation.

The treble offers a safe, natural, and polite character, providing adequate detail without excessive brightness or roll-off, though it may lack sparkle for some listeners. Technically, the Volume S performs at a level comparable to the Moondrop Blessing 3, excelling particularly in the incisive attack and substantial weight behind each note. When compared to competitors, the Volume S edges out the Tea Pro in bass quality, separation, and natural timbre, though the Tea Pro offers a wider stage. Against the Blessing 3, the Volume S trades openness and cleanliness for a more fun, bass-forward and impactful experience. It also presents a more balanced signature than the brighter, more treble-focused Kiwi Ears Astral.

Ultimately earning an A-minus rating, the Volume S is highly recommended for those seeking exceptional bass quality and a fun, colored tuning. However, it might not suit listeners prioritizing a wide soundstage, a neutral signature, or a bright, sparkly treble with forward micro-details; these listeners are advised to audition first.

Bass: S Mids: A- Treble: A+

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
Fun, V-shaped tuning. Fantastic bass (both quality and quantity), great V-shaped tuning, excellent detail, and precise imaging. Treble is too much, could use more vocal focus.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Softears Volume S reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A Tech
A benchmark for tonality and timbre. Studio 4 with DD bass, great bass texture, tonal accuracy, forward vocals, and natural timbre. High impedance mode sounds bright.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Lots of upper trebble.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: A-

Softears Volume S reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Great midrange at the price, hard to beat.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8 * score rescaled + normalized
15 community members have rated the Sennheiser IE600 at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Softears Volume S reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.9 * score rescaled + normalized
17 community members have rated the SOFTEARS VOLUME S at an average of 4.6/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Sennheiser IE600 (more reviews)

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Crin

Crin 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Well-tuned mids, powerful yet controlled sub-bass, with highly extended (and somewhat spicy) treble.
Youtube Video Summary

Sennheiser’s IE600 reads like a course correction for a storied brand whose IEMs long suffered a 2–5 kHz dip and blunted energy. Here the midrange is finally set straight—no weird upper-mid recession, just natural, well-placed mids with proper presence. The single dynamic driver is tuned with uncommon discipline: a sub-bass-focused shelf that brings power and tactility without bleed, staying tight and controlled where past models went mushy.

The twist is the treble: an emphasis around 9–10 kHz that can split listeners. For some, that edge will read as sibilant; for others, it’s the rare, airy sparkle that makes cymbals and transients feel alive—call it the “blue cheese” effect. Technical chops are no afterthought either; resolution sits shoulder-to-shoulder with the IE900, trading blows with heavy hitters like Softears Turii, Dunu Luna, and JVC HA-FW10000, while avoiding their tuning quirks.

Measured against its field, the IE600 delivers A+ tone, A+ technical performance, and at $700 earns serious value credentials—enough to make the pricier IE900 feel hard to justify. In the wake of the Sonova acquisition, this feels like redemption: a market-breaking Sennheiser IEM that gets the fundamentals right, then adds just enough treble audacity to be special.


Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 7.1 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A Tech
Comment: Stock eartips are a disgrace. Superb clarity with good tuning and bass response Treble is on the energetic side

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A- Mids: B- Treble: A- Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 6.6 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
Well-extended on both ends of the spectrum and adds back in the upper-midrange the IE900 lacked.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: A- Details: B Imaging: C+

Sennheiser IE600 reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 6.5 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
The most technical DD I've heard. Tuning is not perfect for my library - V-Shape. Get's a rec for those that really enjoy a well done V DD. Could use more stage size and bass impact. Fit is not the best, but good comfort for me.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: A- Mids: B Treble: B Details: A- Imaging: A-

Softears Volume S (more reviews)

Softears Volume S reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
A wonderful sounding IEM. A more neutral version of the Meta tuning. Works with absoltuely everything and sounds great. Cable is microphonic, but comes with a great carry case and premium eartips.
Youtube Video Summary

Softears Volume S follows the 2022 Volume and steps into a fiercely competitive ~$320 bracket with a seriously premium kit: a gorgeous leather case, modular screw-on terminations, both standard and Ultra Clear eartips, IM booties, and tiny screwdrivers for the on-board potentiometer. The stealthy black resin shells with exposed carbon-fiber faceplates feel solid and fit well thanks to slim nozzles; just note there’s no nozzle mesh. The big caveat is the cloth-sheathed stock cable—ergonomically nice but with heavy microphonics. Two tunings are selectable: low-impedance (≈10Ω) and high-impedance (≈31Ω). The low-impedance mode is the keeper; it’s easy to drive yet sensitive to source output impedance, so a dongle under 1Ω is recommended to avoid unintentionally shifting the tonality.

In low-impedance mode the signature is neutral-natural, a flatter, more mid-centric take on “new-meta.” Bass offers quality over quantity: textured, punchy, and responsive without tipping into basshead territory. The mids are the star—clean, warm-tinged lower mids give male vocals body while female vocals sit forward without shout, keeping timbre natural. Treble is smooth, airy, and non-fatiguing, avoiding metallic glare while preserving sparkle. Technical performance is confidently above average for the price: imaging & stage feel wide and well-layered, with good separation and resolution that rewards attentive listening without forcing it.

Positionally, think “Kato upgrade”: smoother treble, better bass texture, and a refinement that many will prefer. Versus spicier rivals like DaVinci, Project Meta, Dusk DSP, or Mega 5 EST, the Volume S sounds more controlled and “correct,” trading some slam and upper-air fireworks for coherence and timbre. It won’t thrill bass lovers, treble heads, or detail chasers seeking a spotlighted presentation; everyone else gets a superb all-rounder that feels benchmark-worthy—the HD600/650 vibe for IEMs. Verdict: you should buy this if a do-it-all, neutral-natural tuning is the goal; just mind your source impedance and consider swapping the cable to kill the microphonics.


Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Softears Volume S reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 7.5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Great allrounder
Youtube Video Summary

The Softears Volume S delivers a fantastic hybrid sound in its low impedance mode, characterized as a warm neutral tuning with a lush note weight, good bass punch without bloat, and a slight upper-midrange emphasis that makes vocals pop. This signature translates exceptionally well across both music listening and competitive gaming, offering great separation, layering, and phenomenal imaging for precise positional awareness. While engaging and non-fatiguing, gunfire and intense effects in games like Apex Legends can sometimes feel on the verge of shouty or slightly occlusive during chaotic, high-level scenarios, lacking that last bit of air and resolution in the upper mids.

Gaming performance shines across multiple titles. The Volume S provides outstanding depth perception and accurate imaging for Apex Legends slides and light footsteps, excels in Valorant with its separation and verticality, handles the chaos of Call of Duty exceptionally well, and proves to be a top recommendation for Fragpunk due to its loud, precise, and easily trackable footsteps. The smaller resin chassis offers great comfort and ergonomics, especially for those struggling with fit, though it doesn't feel quite as premium as some metal competitors in its price range.

Significant drawbacks include the utterly dismissed high impedance mode tuning, deemed "absolute garbage" and a headache for gaming, and the fragile tuning mechanism itself, prone to easy damage. The included shoelace-style cable is functional with a removable termination but not a favorite, and the unboxing experience, while decent with a pleather case, extra termination, and two sets of silicone tips, is fairly typical for the price. Ultimately, the Softears Volume S stands as a killer all-around IEM when locked into its excellent low impedance mode, highly recommended for its crossover appeal despite the useless tuning switch and build quibbles.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

Softears Volume S reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 7.3 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
A Tuning
B+ Tech
Lower-mid-centric hybrid with uncommon mid-bass emphasis and lush vocals; relaxed upper treble and smaller stage prevent it from being the $300 class leader. Thick, natural mids with convincing vocal weight and well-executed sub- and mid-bass emphasis. Relaxed upper treble narrows stage and reduces perceived resolution, and the bass can become fatiguing at higher volumes; impedance switch offers limited benefit.
Youtube Video Summary

Softears Vol S leans into a mid-bass emphasis that is uncommon among recent hybrids, pairing boosted sub- and mid-bass with full-bodied, lower-mid vocals. The result is a naturally thick, lush midrange that favors genres needing body over sparkle, and the relaxed treble beyond ear-gain lets volume changes scale bass and treble together. At higher listening levels the set can hit hard and verge on bass fatigue, but within moderate levels it fills a clear gap left by leaner U-shaped tunings.

Trade-offs are plain: the upper-treble sits back, so stage is smaller and overall resolution is lower versus airier peers; some upper-end information gets masked by the bass weight. The impedance switch adds a bit of brightness but also trims the pleasing volume scaling, bringing limited benefit. Not a $300 class leader, yet a well-tuned alternative for listeners who prioritize natural, weighty mids over maximum air and sparkle.

Bass: A- Mids: A Treble: B+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B+ Details: B+

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

Softears Volume S reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.2 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

The Softears Volume S offers a dramatic transformation through its impedance switch, requiring a tiny screwdriver to toggle between low (9.8 ohm) and high (31.2 ohm) modes. The low impedance mode is described as painfully clinical, bland, and annoyingly sterile across all tested amplifiers. It’s reminiscent of the disliked original Volume model, lacking any enjoyable tuning despite EQ attempts. This mode only suits listeners craving absolute neutrality, offering little musical engagement.

Switching to the high impedance mode completely revolutionizes the experience. It becomes relaxed, unoffensive, and remarkably smooth, with notes possessing a lingering, church-like resonance that adds emotional depth. This mode presents music with a spacious, uplifting quality and a subtle chest-felt pressure during resonant passages. However, it demands quality amplification to shine and benefits from tip-rolling; the included sticky liquid silicone tips enhance the signature, though alternatives like Azla SednaEarfit can tweak the response. Comfort and build are excellent, though the fabric cable exhibits some microphonics.

Priced around $300, the Volume S earns a cautious recommendation primarily for its stellar high-impedance performance. It requires tinkering with tips and sources to reach its potential and faces stiff competition in its price bracket. While not an outright class leader, it’s a significant upgrade over the original Volume. The package includes a luxurious case, multiple tips, and a branded USB-C adapter, reflecting Softears' typical attention to detail. Just keep it locked in high-impedance mode.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Softears Volume S reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 6.7 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A Mids: B+ Treble: B+ Dynamics: A- Details: B+ Imaging: B+

Sennheiser IE600 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Softears Volume S User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 2 user reviews

8.2

Very Positive

Sennheiser IE600 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.7

Gaming Grade

B+

Softears Volume S Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.3

Gaming Grade

A+

Sennheiser IE600 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • It manages detail and layering well enough, even if the stage feels only moderately sized. You get a clear sense of left and right, if not depth.
Bass A-
Bass is strong and well-defined, delivering slam with admirable control. Electronic drops hit with authority.
Mids B+
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble B
Treble is articulate and clean, adding excitement without harshness. It adds sparkle without harshness.
Dynamics B+
The performance feels robust, with satisfying punch and natural transitions. Nuances are easy to follow.
Soundstage A-
All dimensions bloom together, producing an expansive venue that feels carefully rendered. You can map the ensemble easily.
Details A-
Textural subtleties glow, giving each recording a beautifully illuminated character. It exposes mix decisions with precision.
Imaging B+
Depth cues step forward, giving performances a dimensional presence. Front-to-back cues become more immersive.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Softears Volume S Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • A competent technical showing keeps separation intact while delivering modest staging. It feels tidy even when recordings stack layers.
Bass A+
It serves up confident rumble and texture while keeping the spectrum balanced. You can enjoy bass-heavy music without fatigue.
Mids A
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics B
The performance feels robust, with satisfying punch and natural transitions. Nuances are easy to follow.
Soundstage A-
You hear both the breadth and the altitude of the mix, anchored by accurate positional cues. Immersion improves across genres.
Details B+
Recordings feel well sorted, with supporting details snapping to attention. Small articulations remain intact.
Imaging B+
Depth cues step forward, giving performances a dimensional presence. Front-to-back cues become more immersive.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Good value for serious gaming performance.

Sennheiser IE600 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Softears Volume S User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Syren avatar Syren
9.2

A well-rounded, coherent IEM that shines in low-impedance tuning with excellent midrange clarity.

Tuning: S Tech: S- Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: S Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S-
Pros
Balanced, natural midrange with solid bass and rich accessories.
Cons
High-impedance mode feels unnecessary and shells may be bulky for small ears.
M Makavelian
7.2

RSV with more bass quantity and better quality, at less than half the price.

Tuning: A- Tech: A- Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A-
Pros
Very nicely balanced sound signature for all-rounder duties, with tonality and technical performance that punches above its price. More even sub - mid bass profile which results in a more cohesive, better textured bass vs harman/meta tuned sets.
Cons
Pinna gain isn't an ideal fit for my HRTF, hearing slightly too much upper-mid emphasis after extended listening and comparisons. Upper treble is lacking air vs more expensive sets, most evident in cymbal hits coming across dulled, not unlike the RSV

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer