Lime Ears Maris VS Shure KSE1500

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Lime Ears Maris and Shure KSE1500 are in-ear monitors. Lime Ears Maris costs $2,700 while Shure KSE1500 costs $3,000. Shure KSE1500 is $300 more expensive. Lime Ears Maris holds a decisive 2.8-point edge in reviewer scores (8.7 vs 5.9). Lime Ears Maris has significantly better bass with a 4.3-point edge, Lime Ears Maris has significantly better mids with a 4.3-point edge, Lime Ears Maris has significantly better treble with a 4.6-point edge, Lime Ears Maris has significantly better dynamics with a 1.6-point edge, Shure KSE1500 has better details with a 0.6-point edge and Lime Ears Maris has significantly better imaging with a 3.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Lime Ears Maris Shure KSE1500
Bass 9.3 5
Mids 8.3 4
Treble 8.6 4
Details 9.4 10
Soundstage 9.3 5.9
Imaging 9.5 6
Dynamics 7.6 6
Tonality 8.6 4.3
Technicalities 9.2 7.3
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Lime Ears Maris and Shure KSE1500 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Lime Ears Maris Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.7

Excellent


Shure KSE1500 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.9

Mixed


Reviews Comparison

Lime Ears Maris (more reviews)

Lime Ears Maris reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 9.4 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
S Tuning
S Tech
Full, weighty tuning with deep sub-bass and dimensional mids; EST treble adds clarity without fatigue. Stage depth and layering stand out, and it scales with higher volumes. Exceptional spatial layering with deep, textured bass, dimensional mids, and smooth yet resolving EST treble. Very expensive and prefers higher listening levels; the fuller low end may not suit lean or bright signatures.
Youtube Video Summary

Lime Ears Maris takes a fuller, weightier direction than Terra, with a stronger low-end shelf, relaxed upper mids, a gentle 5 kHz dip, and extended air via ESTs. The 12-driver quad architecture (dual dynamics, six BAs, two ESTs, two bone-conduction) is used to create a highly natural and non-fatiguing balance where clarity sits slightly forward yet never turns sharp. The theme is unmistakable: depth, body, and a sense of scale that suits higher listening levels.

What stands out is the front-to-back layering: bass feels enclosure-like with real sub-bass reach, while the mids carry dimension and texture rather than a flat plane. The set behaves like a playlist killer, handling hip-hop and EDM as confidently as acoustic material, delivering impact without losing composure. Bone-conduction and dual DD tricks add a visceral undertow that typical graphs do not fully explain.

Technical performance is elite: resolution and microdetail arrive with a refined BA timbre, and the soundstage maps distinct zones in height and depth with precise imaging. Treble sits perfectly judged over the weighty foundation, using EST sparkle for air rather than glare. At around 2,800 USD, the execution of driver roles and end-to-end tuning coherence justifies summit-fi expectations.

Bass: S Mids: S Treble: S Dynamics: S Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

Lime Ears Maris reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Great all arounder, fantastic drivers and inoffensive.
Youtube Video Summary

Lime Ears Maris is a flagship 12-driver quad-brid with branded components, combining multiple BAs for lows/mids, dual Sonion ESTs for air, and a dual Sonion bone conductor for full-range weight. At $2,700 (“Ensemble”), it brings a thin-walled but comfortably large shell, flat 2-pin sockets, and an excellent leather puck case; build and fit feel deliberately premium, with only a minor faceplate edge that can snag. Overall presentation and ergonomics signal a top-tier, tour-worthy piece.

Sonically it’s a fun, impactful tuning: bass hits hard with tactile BC rumble, treble/air are pristine, and resolution is high with an open, spacious stage. The upper-mids are slightly restrained (a touch of ~4 kHz dip) which softens attack—less “incisive” than the graph might suggest—but the set remains clean, coherent, and easy to listen to for treble-sensitive listeners. Think “inoffensive but exceptional”: refined energy up top, big physical slam down low, and clarity that holds together complex mixes.

Context against peers: Terra is exciting but the 5–6 kHz energy can fatigue; Incognita tracks a preferred curve better as a one-and-done at a lower price. Annihilator offers more bite in upper-mids/treble, yet Maris will suit those sensitive to that region; versus Grand Maestro, Maris wins on comfort and bass quality. Compared with Europa, Cadenza 12, Omnium, and Visioner’s 10, trade-offs shift—some deliver sharper treble “spark” or smaller shells—but the Maris’s bone-conducted bass, comfort, and safe-refined balance make it a strong recommend to demo at a show before choosing.

Mids: A- Treble: A+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: S

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Lime Ears Maris reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 8.2 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S+ Tech
Rating: S- | Value: ⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮🎮 | Comfort: 8 fun. detailed. wide. inoffensive. the price

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Shure KSE1500 (more reviews)

Shure KSE1500 reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 5.9 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
A- Tech
Top-tier detail and speed, just be aware that it's very bright.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: B Details: S+ Imaging: B

Lime Ears Maris User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Shure KSE1500 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Lime Ears Maris Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.5

Gaming Grade

A

Shure KSE1500 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.9

Gaming Grade

C

Lime Ears Maris Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • A masterfully balanced signature renders music effortlessly realistic and emotionally engaging. Nuanced mixes benefit from its balance.

Average Technical Grade

S
  • Expect an effortlessly clean presentation that keeps complex mixes perfectly organized. There is zero sense of congestion even at high volume.
Bass S
You get a reference-grade low end that feels powerful, deep, and effortlessly clean. The low-end foundation sounds studio-grade.
Mids A+
It offers a luxurious, resolving midrange that captures micro-detail beautifully. Every vocal inflection is captured.
Treble S-
Expect a radiant top end that paints every sparkle with precision. Harmonics soar without turning edgy.
Dynamics A
It delivers crisp, authoritative dynamics that keep music thrilling. Subtle level shifts are clearly conveyed.
Soundstage S
Reference-class soundstage delivering a perfectly spherical presentation with seemingly infinite space. Spatial cues extend seemingly without limit.
Details S
Every recording is presented with forensic clarity that still sounds organic. It reveals the recording environment perfectly.
Imaging S
Every performer appears sculpted in air, never wavering from their precise coordinate. It remains rock solid no matter the track.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Shure KSE1500 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • A competent technical showing keeps separation intact while delivering modest staging. It feels tidy even when recordings stack layers.
Bass C+
Low-end delivery feels competent yet unremarkable, keeping a safe profile. Low-end bloom is kept in check.
Mids C-
The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.
Treble C-
Treble is adequate overall, though its texture can feel coarse. Longer sessions may expose grain.
Dynamics B
Expect energetic dynamics that bring music to life without harshness. It injects enthusiasm into fast music.
Details S+
Every recording is presented with forensic clarity that still sounds organic. It reveals the recording environment perfectly.
Imaging B
Instrument boundaries feel well carved, avoiding smear or drift. Instrument outlines feel well-defined.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Lime Ears Maris User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Shure KSE1500 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer